Did you see the word "was" in your question? It was.
Then why not a "yes or no" answer. Enough of your constant evasion. Does Islam sanction terror?
Was terror Catholic? or Protestant?
Yes - or - no?
I said it was. So yes.
Interesting. You actually believe that the terrorism in the UK and Ireland was because Christianity sanctioned terrorism and that The Bible espoused terrorism as a solution.
How can you support that?
Did not say that.
That has to be your position dude. If Catholicism and Protestantism were terrorism, then their religion and the Vatican were the support structure.
You are saying that, not me. The doctrine of Christianity does not sanction terror.
Nope: if terrorism and Christianity are inexplicably linked - as you assert, then Christianity espouses and supports terrorist activity.
Hey, it's your assertion. So the question is, how do you support such an assertion?
Nope: if terrorism and Christianity are inexplicably linked - as you assert, then Christianity espouses and supports terrorist activity.
Hey, it's your assertion. So the question is, how do you support such an assertion?
True to liberal political correctness the report makes no mention of Islam or how these terrorists got into France
It is not my assertion. Christianity was hijacked for nefarious purposes. Islam was not. If you cannot understand the difference we are finished.
Can you name a single terrorist attack - ever, in the history of the world - where Islamic extremism was the motivation and people never knew about it.
Good luck.
Yeah, it's really annoying how these news sources wont go speculating about what investigations will probably confirm, but would rather wait for official findings.
I don't buy ANYTHING the authorities say until they prove it.
So...they say they averted an attack. Fine...prove it in court and then I might believe them.
This is the same crap American authorities tried to pass off a few years ago and it turned out to be nonsense.
I am not saying they did not avert an attack. But until they prove it - I ain't believing it.
You are saying that, not me. The doctrine of Christianity does not sanction terror.
Then you need more bodies to believe it. You will get your wish.
Funny...the Crusades seem to evoke lots of terror. And it was sanctioned by the church.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusades
You need to accept, if you accept Islam, these things are going to happen and there is no reason to think they had any other intentions. What will it take for you to get that is all I was saying.I never said I wanted more bodies...don't put words in my mouth.
'Reading Comprehension' and you are not on a first name basis are you?
:roll:
Be careful, your IQ is showing.
We are done here.
Bu bye.
I think you may have to read back (maybe as far as #35 or even before) to see how this exchange came to be. And when, in that context, someone makes the pitiful attempt to lureSo, it is "correct" that Islam is a terrorist religion...
It shocks me that you think that way.
Arcan Cetin is a pretty good example. You'll of course now say that he wasn't an Islamic terrorist, and then my point is proven
Actually I would say he was a crazy wife beater. When a person's mind isn't right, they cannot execute a well thought out plan to harm our nation. Secondly, I won't say that Islamic terrorism was the motivation. Because the authorities said it wasn't.
Do you want round two? When did authorities lie about the motivation of a terrorist attack?
I think you may have to read back (maybe as far as #35 or even before) to see how this exchange came to be. And when, in that context, someone makes the pitiful attempt to lure
me or anybody else towards sharing into his or her simplistic world view, I don't bite. Especially not when that attempt consists of a question that already holds the foregone conclusion and offers, in hilarious attempt of being dictatorial, only two options.
It isn't much different from asking you (or me) when you (or I) stopped beating the wife.
That coldjoint doesn't get it does not surprise me. That you interpret my answer as being an affirmative does, however.
I'm just reading what's on the page and note that I was shocked by it. Perhaps you can clarify your position.
1) that I don't discuss the nature or fabric of Islam with the poster in question. Ever. On account of his blatant ignorance on the matter itself, its history, history in general and his single minded insistence on not only staying in his information bubble, but wanting to impose it onto everybody else.
2) that the whole issue cannot be answered with either yes or no, no matter how much he thinks that his so doing should have everybody else following suit.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?