fourddream
Member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2006
- Messages
- 53
- Reaction score
- 0
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Very Liberal
They set the standard and a very low one it is, about 666mm from the ground grovelling to the whims of the raketeers in the white house.Ivan The Terrible said:fourddream,
Well I impressed. I usually have to fight with the humans here to get them to admit my God Hood. Let's deal with your post shall we?
If you indeed believe this why did you single out Fox?
fourddream said:They set the standard and a very low one it is, about 666mm from the ground grovelling to the whims of the raketeers in the white house.
A.
Deegan said:It's folks like you who give them free advertising everyday, you actually helped their ratings, they should send you some No Spin gear!:rofl
aps said:LOL I can't stand Rita Cosby's voice! It's funny, Angie Harmon's raspy voice--sexy. Rita Cosby's raspy voice--totally not sexy.
What could you two be thinking?I don't like her show. She gets to interview very interesting people but she asks them leading questions, which drives me nuts. A good interviewer will ask a question that will allow the person to provide a thoughtful response. Here is part of the transcript from Monday's show. She is interviewing a reporter about the case involving Imette St. Guillian.
Rita, will you let the damn reporter talk? Look at her. She's feeding the person answers. Did you think he was a suspect, or that he was trying to cover his trail, or wanted publicity. Just ask what her reaction was!
Sorry, vauge and americanwoman--she stinks. :thumbdown
hipsterdufus said:Rita sounds like she smoke 3 packs of camel no-filters a day.
Her show on MSNBC is terrible - pretty much all fluff pieces.
Pacridge said:IMO, all news is becoming more and more fluff.
Its nice to see you again...About Fox News I usually watch the O'Factor and when they have the weekly review with a bunch of collumnists and they criticise all other news organizations is one of my favorite shows!americanwoman said:I like her, too. She has that raspy voice that just kinda draws you in I guess.
Please fourdream MSNBC, and CNN both have access to Congress as well so what is your point? They are all the same in my book!fourddream said:They set the standard and a very low one it is, about 666mm from the ground grovelling to the whims of the raketeers in the white house.
A.
Pacridge said:Ever watch any Nancy Grace?
fourddream said:If A = 1, B = 2, C = 3 etc. then you can alot every letter a number.
Numbers to 9 stay themselves when finding the root. double numbers such as
J = 10, K = 11, L = 12 are added so J=1, K=2, L=3.
You can easily make a "basic numerology chart" by putting the single numbers 1 through 9 along the top and placing the alphabet under those numbers in rows of 9.
You will find that only 3 letters have a 6 root: the F, O, X.
or the 6th 15th and 24th letters of the alphabet, yes FOX = 666..
aps said:I love her! She is a tough momma.
fourddream said:FOX (666) ratings are in freefall.:lol: You can go here for article and links.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/3/1/111723/4980
The Real McCoy said:Then let's take the letters of your name, fourdream.
F = 6
O= 15
U=21
R=18
D=4
R=18
E=5
A=1
M=13
Now, when all added up, the sum equals 101
Now you're obviously a clever one (considering you know the truth behind 9/11) so it's clear that your alias is in code and that the correct name is "4dream."
4=4
D=4 } 4 + 4 + 18 = 26
R=18
E=5
A=1
and 5 + 1 = 6
M=13 } 1 x 3 = 3 (x 2 for the 2 separate digits in 13) = 6
AHA!
666!
THE MARK OF THE BEAST!
4DREAM IS THE ANTICHRIST! 4DREAM IS THE ANTICHRIST!!!!! AVERT YOUR EARS FROM HIS FALSE PROPHESIES OR FACE THE FIRES OF HELL!!!!! AHHHHH IT'S THE APOCALYPSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Pacridge said:Odd, maybe I should watch her again. I've only seen her a couple times. Both times she was asking questions then answering them herself before the person she was interviewing could even say anything. When she wasn't doing that was she was asking one leading question after another.
I respect your opinion greatly. When I have moment I'll try and catch her again.
aquapub said:ATTENTION ALL:
Please follow the ratings link here and learn what it is to lie with statistics.
In every time slot across the board, no matter how you slice it, this link proves that FOX is utterly annihilating its competition, often taking in more viewers than everyone else combined.
This "freefall" wording is an outright lie, and the author is apparently counting on people not actually checking the link. Not only does it vary from slot to slot whether or not FOX even declined at all, but in some categories and slots, it GAINED.
And the temporary fluctuations have zero affect on the still gargantuan leads FOX continues to haul in.
Even if the ratings DID show any kind of broad loss over one month (which they don't), it would be completely dishonest to represent it as a trend. Take a statistics class. One data point does not constitute a trend.
They are simply being utterly misrepresented here for political gain-as usual-by a party neurotically consumed with undermining the first news outlet in American history to break the liberal stranglehold and report the news along the same political leanings as mainstream America (demonstrably)-as opposed to condescendingly crusading to "fix" America's moderately conservative perspective.
Also, the anti-Bush blog this all derived from might not be such a smart source for anyone who wants to maintain a shred of credibility. :roll:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?