- Joined
- Jan 2, 2009
- Messages
- 17,927
- Reaction score
- 10,823
- Location
- Washington State
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Say all you want to, that doesn't make you correct.Like I said: you are wrong.
Your moon has set; you need to accept that.Say all you want to, that doesn't make you correct.
Now, if you were to demonstrate in an intelligent manner that not having cameras on during the press conferences meets any reasonable definition of censorship, I'd be happy to consider it.
Clever.Your moon has set; you need to accept that.
Another FNC host not happy with the President. He tweeted:
Fox News’ John Roberts Exits Off-Camera Press Briefing Early, Throwing Shade | Deadline
You have described your own argument; it fails.Clever.
I knew you couldn't support your argument, simply because it's not supportable.
First they take the cameras...Fill in the rest.
It results in lower viewer numbers for listening/watching the actual white house communication. Fewer people checking what the White House is saying, and hearing journalists ask the White House questions the White House tries to avoid, and avoid being seen answering.
As though you have to have this explained to you.
Radio/audio is a thing of the past, replaced by video, primarily because people pay more attention to it, and most of our entire news/media network is now built around video.
Next thing you know Trump will be pushing us towards coal for energy independence, jobs, and environmental awareness.
Why don't you fill it in for us. Just more hand ringing and teeth gnashing. The exact information
is being provided whether on camera or just audio.
This is due to the action of the "Lil" Dictator in the Oval office. For the last 20 years we've had camera's during the daily White House briefing--and we've had some pretty tough White House Press Secretaries that could take the heat.
If Trump couldn't handle the heat in the White House, he shouldn't have run for the hottest seat in the WORLD.
A neuroscientist explains: Trump has a mental disorder that makes him a dangerous world leader
So why hide from the cameras? Makes no sense.
Who is hiding? The exact info is being presented. Camera or no camera.
It frightens me that 40% of our country approves of what is happening at the White House, as does, it seems, more than 50% of Congress. Don't people understand the importance of the press in ensuring a strong democracy? You can not speak truth to power without a vibrant press.
Frankly, I am suffering from some degree of delusion as a I believed the American system of government was a bit more "bullet proof" in that it would be quick to identify and erratic internal threats. I continue, however, with the hope that with a little time, another 10-15% will come to their senses and do the right thing.... Right now, however, it seems our nation's leaders are a feeble crew, with no sense about right and wrong. Weak people without a moral compass are dangerous.
Sorry for taking your specific comment and responding with a global statement of frustration (and fear)...
No offense, but you saying it fails isn't very compelling or accurate.You have described your own argument; it fails.
Apparently you have to redefine words, create new interpretations of the Constitution, and pretend that cameras during press briefings is a sacred thing. So, lots of imagination, outrage and a healthy dose of Trump hatred.How do off-camera briefings denigrate the importance or power of the press?
That is all that is necessary in response to your argument.No offense, but you saying it fails isn't very compelling or accurate.
Not to intelligent, rational people.That is all that is necessary in response to your argument.
Of course it is sufficient for intelligent, rational people, Moon. I am sorry you don't get it.Not to intelligent, rational people.
Reality bites eh?
I'm done with your unintelligible "NUH UH" babble. Get back to me when you can start making sense and stop being such a partisan puppet.Of course it is sufficient for intelligent, rational people, Moon. I am sorry you don't get it.
You post an opinion, then expect me to rebut it with facts. No, that's not how it works.I'm done with your unintelligible "NUH UH" babble. Get back to me when you can start making sense and stop being such a partisan puppet.
kthxbai
Sorry you are wrong about the press briefings and cameras!
Flashback: Clinton White House said on-camera briefings weren't 'necessary'
Flashback: Clinton White House said on-camera briefings weren't 'necessary'
Just weeks into the new administration, the former President Bill Clinton's administration decided to turn off the cameras for most of George Stephanopolous' press briefings, just as the Trump administration has.
White House press secretary Dee Dee Myers explained in a March 1993 C-SPAN interview that the White House went with live, on-camera briefings to the press for a few weeks. But she said they stopped because the live briefings weren't "really necessary."
"I think that that was something that we did in the first week or two, I can't remember exactly when we stopped it," Myers said.
This is the first time in over 20 years that camera's haven't been allowed in to the daily press briefings. There is a reason for that. A dicator will always eliminate the media first. The Free Press in this country is what keeps this country FREE.
A neuroscientist explains: Trump has a mental disorder that makes him a dangerous world leader
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...0c1087f7583_story.html?utm_term=.03b78c0b6cb2
There has never been a President stupid enough to make enemies out of the 3 most powerful agencies in this country. The media, our intelligence agencies, and the DOJ.
The more he calls the media FAKE, the more they will write & report. The more he insults our intelligence agencies, by claiming that Russia is just a "ruse" the more he implicates himself into a coverup and the deeper they will dig. The more he insults and or threatens the DOJ with firing's, the more information they will leak.
Now you know why the Jeff Sessions story was leaked just last week.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...77740635e83_story.html?utm_term=.07911e5a42cb
They're going to take him down.
Pull your finders out of your ear...No if it was reality we would be able to hear you spout that with a falsetto and a lisp.
Yes, a post dealing with reality was right on cue. Go figure, huh?Right on cue.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?