- Joined
- Jan 30, 2024
- Messages
- 11,441
- Reaction score
- 14,166
- Location
- Southern California
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Again, Taco already caved n deporting a huge number of illegals.
This has gotten the job done.
Link?
And that explains the frequent failure of these events.
Again, the purpose is to promote your view, to convince people to agree with you. Or at least to be mad about whatever you are. Not to be mad at you.
Very true. It is entertaining seeing him flail about though.You gotta remember this is someone who tells tall tales about shooting snakes on his wooden deck and not harming so much as a splinter...with a shotgun! Tries to use that as support for his opinions. He lost all credibility with me long ago.
MAGA terrorists are becoming more brazen.Mass protests against Trump under way across US but violence and threats thwart some rallies – live
Four San Francisco protesters hit by car in ‘possible intentional act’; ‘credible threat’ identified against Texas lawmakers attending ‘No Kings’ protestwww.theguardian.com
Seems like the peaceful opposition to Trump's Stalin moment is riling up the street level fascists.
nopeAnd that explains the frequent failure of these events.
Again, the purpose is to promote your view, to convince people to agree with you. Or at least to be mad about whatever you are. Not to be mad at you.
It's better to make people mad at what you are mad at. Not mad at the people protesting, when those protests turn into disruption, vandalism, etc.
Is "Taco" supposed to be some kind of a dig at the president? lol.Again, Taco already caved n deporting a huge number of illegals.
This has gotten the job done.
Very true. It is entertaining seeing him flail about though.
So he drove through a crowd and none are injured? Sounds to me like just drove on the street and people got out of the way.Also in Virginia
Man arrested for driving his SUV through 'No Kings' protest in Culpeper, none injured
Culpeper Police Department (CPD) arrested a man who drove his car into a crowd of protestors on Saturday, striking one of them, according to officials.Accordinwjla.com
You gotta remember this is someone who tells tall tales about shooting snakes on his wooden deck and not harming so much as a splinter...with a shotgun! He lost all credibility with me long ago.
Like i said.
"For example. "Iowa’s bill, SF 342, provides civil immunity to any driver who injures someone participating in a “protest, demonstration, riot, or unlawful assembly,” (key word OR) engaging in “disorderly conduct,” or blocking traffic so long as the driver is exercising “due care.” In Iowa disorderly conduct is defined very broadly and includes something as simple as obstructing a sidewalk, making this bill applicable to any protester on a public street or sidewalk that is deemed to be blocking it.
Is "Taco" supposed to be some kind of a dig at the president? lol.
The disruptive "protests" have had zero impact on his policy. That change is tied to agriculture and other business interests giving feedback to the administration.
Care to try again.Do you guys has a sad?
.....making this bill applicable to any protester on a public street or sidewalk that is deemed to be blocking it.And again if it’s a legal protest there is no immunity. And short if after already being shown to not have a clue what you are talking about I am not taking your claims of what constitutes disorderly conduct with proof.
So no comment in the Oklahoma bill either huh.
And most importantly none of these bills are just allowing people to run over protesters. Which was the original claim.
Poorly written law right. It contradicts itself.And you think someone running over a protestor on a sidewalk would be found to be exercising due care and not acting recklessly.
So he drove through a crowd and none are injured? Sounds to me like just drove on the street and people got out of the way.
Watching him try and weasel out of his previously ignorant posts is hilarious.And you think someone running over a protestor on a sidewalk would be found to be exercising due care and not acting recklessly.
Ignoring quotes is hilarious.Watching him try and weasel out of his previously ignorant posts is hilarious.
To bad he lacks the integrity to just snit he was talking out his ass but I know that isn’t going to happen.
No the law is written just fine. The problem is just you failed to read it and then posted some ignorant bs. And now are trying to weasel out of it.POorlyvwritten law right. It contradicys itself.
Beanbag or kinetic less-than-lethal 12 gauge slugs could work to pulverize a snake to death without severely damaging a wooden deck. But it would almost certainly dent or at least leave a Hell of a scuff mark on the decks.
A car driving on a sidewalk is not exercising due care. And any legal protest means no immunity......making this bill applicable to any protester on a public street or sidewalk that is deemed to be blocking it.
Not as hilarious as watching you continue to embarrass yourself.Ignoring quotes is hilarious.
You are being very selective.A car driving on a sidewalk is not exercising due care. And any legal protest means no immunity.
Sorry you were lied to and now you are desperately trying to cover up your ignorance. But it’s not working.
Poorly written law right. It contradicts itself.
A broom would work to remove a snake from a deck, and would make more sense than blasting it with a shotgun. And this is a semi-regular occurrence, according to the story.
You are the one ignoring direct quotes and hurling insults.Not as hilarious as watching you continue to embarrass yourself.
Still don’t want to talk about the Oklahoma law huh. Wonder why.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?