• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Former US firearms investigator illegally trafficked guns to Mexico, government document alleges

Moon

Why so serious?
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 2, 2009
Messages
20,995
Reaction score
13,258
Location
Washington State
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative

Former US firearms investigator illegally trafficked guns to Mexico, government document alleges
https://www.reuters.com/world/forme...y-trafficked-guns-mexico-govt-doc-2023-10-20/

Looks like one reason why the federal government won’t enforce its own gun control laws is their own people are violating them.
 
What good would a ban do when employees of the federal government are trafficking guns and parts illegally?
What's the saying about a government that doesn't obey it's own laws?

Not the only federal agency which isn't following the laws applicable to them.

The inspector general of the Department of Justice recently reported on the excesses of federal law enforcement. The section of his report on the FBI is enough to cause any fair person to realize that the FBI needs radical reforms or even dissolution.​

The above driven home with what we've seen of the FBI since the start of their Crossfire-Hurricane investigation, mainly driven by fabricated 'opposition research' demanded and paid for by the Hillery campaign; the FBI, and the DOJ, having been politicized and used as a political weapon.
 
Lying on form 4473 is rarely prosecuted and possession by a ‘prohibited person’ is usually left up to state/local prosecutorial discretion.
 
What good would a ban do when employees of the federal government are trafficking guns and parts illegally?

I dare say federal employees have been caught selling drugs
Do you want to legalize all drugs because of that ?
 
I dare say federal employees have been caught selling drugs
Do you want to legalize all drugs because of that ?
The way you’re hauling those goalposts around already, it must be leg day.
 
Reactions: lwf

Nonsense. Your link cites only 7 cases (resulting in conviction).


 
The way you’re hauling those goalposts around already, it must be leg day.

Like the way you're cherry picking in the way you compare apples to oranges as you go down the rabbit hole with your gas lighting and Sea-Lioning ?
 

I searched 4473 and showed the very first hit which contradicted your broad brush You replied with a 5-year-old study. Have a good one.
 
I searched 4473 and showed the very first hit which contradicted your broad brush You replied with a 5-year-old study. Have a good one.
How about a newer report?

 
I'm not playing a stupid statistical whack-a-mole game today. I posted a link that contradicted the @ttwtt78640 assertion.
Have a good one.
 
I'm not playing a stupid statistical whack-a-mole game today.
Because that's not a winning play for you.

I posted a link that contradicted the @ttwtt78640 assertion.
Have a good one.
You've provided a couple of anecdotes. That's not data. We typically see 70k+ denials on NICS checks. In 2010 the feds successfully prosecuted 10. Not 10,000. 10.

Anytime a gun control advocate wants to discount the statistics we know why.
 
I'm not playing a stupid statistical whack-a-mole game today. I posted a link that contradicted the @ttwtt78640 assertion.
Have a good one.

How did that link contradict something that is still true?
 
I searched 4473 and showed the very first hit which contradicted your broad brush You replied with a 5-year-old study. Have a good one.

There are many such links, yet few assert anything different. You found one example (about a single court) consisting of a whole 7 convictions to show that my assertion (that prosecution was rare) was “contradicted”.




 
You don't trust the ATF to tell the truth about themselves?
Bureaucracies aren't known for being truthful about themselves, they are more known for corruption and political favors.
Granted, some are worse and far worse than others.
 
I searched 4473 and showed the very first hit which contradicted your broad brush You replied with a 5-year-old study. Have a good one.
Need this 4473 form is not a background check. When you fill it out and purchase a firearm from a gun dealer that's the only time you need to fill it out. The dealer then calls someone at a federal agency and this someone at a federal agency books to see if you have any records in nics database. Only 20% of records actually get reported to the NICS database.

So it's fake. There isn't the law requiring police agencies to report whether they arrested somebody for violent offenses price is spent any time in jail or anything like that.

This isn't about screening you clearly because there's nothing to screen. You can fill out one of these friends and lie about your felony status and the chances are you won't get caught.

It is an effort for the ATF to collect information and store it so they can keep tabs on something there by federal law forbidden to keep tabs on.

I don't know how you can support this lawlessness. Oh but I forgot the ends justify the means.
 
But they’re portable cherries.
The one that always cracks me up at sea-lioning. That's not a problem that's asking for proof for evidence that's legitimate argument. Cherry picking moving a goal posts false dichotomy those are all fallacies but asking for evidence sea lioning that isn't
 
Mexico has been blessed by a proliferation of American guns imported to their country.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…