Former AG William Barr sits for deposition in House Oversight's Epstein probe

[NoMoreDems-Reps]

Former AG William Barr sits for deposition in House Oversight's Epstein probe

Barr is the first witness called in the Oversight Committee's investigation.

www.yahoo.com

So it's looking less likely that Trump was involved with epstein as many here are hoping !
The most enlightening statement was when Bill Bar said:
"
He said that he had never seen anything that would implicate President Trump in any of this, and that he believed, if there had been anything pertaining to President Trump, with respect to the Epstein list, that he felt like the Biden administration would have probably leaked it out.
"

Posting this so those who are still being played the fool by the media can see that they might be getting played, the fool !

 

[Lutherf]

How long before Preessley or Crockett or Tlaib come out and say something completely different? We're talking about a topic that the Democrats truly believe their supporters will embrace and they KNOW that they can say absolutely anything and those supporters, including the ones in the media, will promote any narrative they are handed.

The Democrat side of all this will most likely be along the lines of "Trump was never exonerated. Trump was never proved not to be there and that makes him a pedophile!". It's just the way the world has worked for the past decade.

 

[Bush Lawyer]

Former AG William Barr sits for deposition in House Oversight's Epstein probe

Barr is the first witness called in the Oversight Committee's investigation.

www.yahoo.com

So it's looking less likely that Trump was involved with epstein as many here are hoping !
The most enlightening statement was when Bill Bar said:
"
He said that he had never seen anything that would implicate President Trump in any of this, and that he believed, if there had been anything pertaining to President Trump, with respect to the Epstein list, that he felt like the Biden administration would have probably leaked it out.
"

Posting this so those who are still being played the fool by the media can see that they might be getting played, the fool !

If this guy Comer is going to give us his version of what Barr deposed to, then let's cut out the middle man and get direct access to all of what Barr deposed to.

Comer words have al the appearance of weasel, especially the emphasis on a 'list' of clients. And, this is not just about clearing or otherwise Humpty is it.? It should be about exposing anyone and everyone who has been involved, no matter who they are.

It would be most surprising that it was only Epstein and Maxwell who drank at the Epstein well of abundance, and it would be equally surprising if the friends of Epstein, those who socialised and partied with him, were unaware of that very same well.

 

[braindrain]

Former AG William Barr sits for deposition in House Oversight's Epstein probe

Barr is the first witness called in the Oversight Committee's investigation.

www.yahoo.com

So it's looking less likely that Trump was involved with epstein as many here are hoping !
The most enlightening statement was when Bill Bar said:
"
He said that he had never seen anything that would implicate President Trump in any of this, and that he believed, if there had been anything pertaining to President Trump, with respect to the Epstein list, that he felt like the Biden administration would have probably leaked it out.
"

Posting this so those who are still being played the fool by the media can see that they might be getting played, the fool !

That you think Trump at the very least didn’t know what was going on is hilarious.

 

[NoMoreDems-Reps]

That you think Trump at the very least didn’t know what was going on is hilarious.

I never said that !
Trump actually reported epstien to the authorities, after he found out what happened to workers that epstien lured away from Trump's employment.

What I pointed out was that even Barr ( who is a rank and file GOP'er) even stated that he did not see anything linking Trump, PLUS THE FACT that if there was anything on Trump biden would have leaked it !.......

 

[NoMoreDems-Reps]

If this guy Comer is going to give us his version of what Barr deposed to, then let's cut out the middle man and get direct access to all of what Barr deposed to.

Comer words have al the appearance of weasel, especially the emphasis on a 'list' of clients. And, this is not just about clearing or otherwise Humpty is it.? It should be about exposing anyone and everyone who has been involved, no matter who they are.

It would be most surprising that it was only Epstein and Maxwell who drank at the Epstein well of abundance, and it would be equally surprising if the friends of Epstein, those who socialised and partied with him, were unaware of that very same well.

ok............
Just realize that biden could have done every thing Trump is doing now, but 4 years ago ! ................
And even today the DEM's are trying to stop the release of this info!

So Trump still has the higher ground, even if it is not immaculate!....

I just wish all the left voters and liberal independent could see and understand this !

 

[Bush Lawyer]

ok............
Just realize that biden could have done every thing Trump is doing now, but 4 years ago ! ................
And even today the DEM's are trying to stop the release of this info!

So Trump still has the higher ground, even if it is not immaculate!....

I just wish all the left voters and liberal independent could see and understand this !

Reminder.

Epstein was first convicted prior to Humpty's first term. He was later arrested again for sex crimes during Humpty's first term and he was found hung in custody during Humpty's first term. Trump did nothing to widen the scope to get right to the entirety of what was happening.

Later, during the election campaign, he and others were strident about finding out and releasing the files etc, and now, you have the complete back flip and this window dressing Congress Committee white wash.

And, do you have a link to Humpty reporting Epstein to authorities about Epstein luring employees away from Mar-a-Lago, or anything for that matter?
To be frank with you, I already know that claim is absolutely incorrect, but, if you can prove wiuth a credible linki that Humpty did dob Epsetien in, I'll happily acknowlowledge and admit my mistake.

Can you tell me why you say his poisition is not immaculate?

 

[Slartibartfast]

Barr has been known to lie for Trump in the past. It would be better to release the unaltered source material to the public with names redacted to protect the victims.

 

[redbeer]

Former AG William Barr sits for deposition in House Oversight's Epstein probe

Barr is the first witness called in the Oversight Committee's investigation.

www.yahoo.com

So it's looking less likely that Trump was involved with epstein as many here are hoping !
The most enlightening statement was when Bill Bar said:
"
He said that he had never seen anything that would implicate President Trump in any of this, and that he believed, if there had been anything pertaining to President Trump, with respect to the Epstein list, that he felt like the Biden administration would have probably leaked it out.
"

Posting this so those who are still being played the fool by the media can see that they might be getting played, the fool !

Sooner or later all of their BS narratives go the way of the drain, proving it's all BS. Yet, they continue to believe the ones lying to them, lol. Halfwit's disguised as intelligent through virtue signaling and gaslighting.

 

[Fletch]

Barr has been known to lie for Trump in the past. It would be better to release the unaltered source material to the public with names redacted to protect the victims.

Of course you are not going to believe anything that Barr or Bondi have to say, but how about Garland? Will you believe him if he says the same thing?

 

[Slartibartfast]

Of course you are not going to believe anything that Barr or Bondi have to say, but how about Garland? Will you believe him if he says the same thing?

I would be more likely to believe Garland, yes. Garland was ethical to a fault in his time as AG and failed to prosecute people who needed prosecution in a timely manner as he was so caught up in his need to appear neutral over the fact of actual crimes that had occurred.

 

[Michael Cole]

Former AG William Barr sits for deposition in House Oversight's Epstein probe

Barr is the first witness called in the Oversight Committee's investigation.

www.yahoo.com

So it's looking less likely that Trump was involved with epstein as many here are hoping !
The most enlightening statement was when Bill Bar said:
"
He said that he had never seen anything that would implicate President Trump in any of this, and that he believed, if there had been anything pertaining to President Trump, with respect to the Epstein list, that he felt like the Biden administration would have probably leaked it out.
"

Posting this so those who are still being played the fool by the media can see that they might be getting played, the fool !

Comer said he expects files by the end of the week, so this seems redundant. Reminds me of the setup Barr performed pre-Mueller.

Chairman Comer: DOJ Complying with Epstein Records Subpoena - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability

United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability

oversight.house.gov

I don't trust Comer for one second, but I'll wait until the files are released.

 

[Fletch]

I would be more likely to believe Garland, yes. Garland was ethical to a fault in his time as AG and failed to prosecute people who needed prosecution in a timely manner as he was so caught up in his need to appear neutral over the fact of actual crimes that had occurred.

Good. I believe he is up next. If he says the same thing about Trump that Barr said will you believe him or not?

 

[Slartibartfast]

Good. I believe he is up next. If he says the same thing about Trump that Barr said will you believe him or not?

We will see. I will certainly take the matter with due consideration, but there is no point in prejudging this until I hear what Garland has to say and how he says it as Garland tends to have a lot of nuance.

 

[Fletch]

We will see. I will certainly take the matter with due consideration, but there is no point in prejudging this until I hear what Garland has to say and how he says it as Garland tends to have a lot of nuance.

Lol. So you will only believe him if he backs up your predetermined conclusion. Thats what I figured. I know this is a huge ask, but forget Trump for a moment, the question for Barr and Garland is why NO ONE was prosecuted for the Epstein matter.

 

[Slartibartfast]

Lol. So you will only believe him if he backs up your predetermined conclusion. Thats what I figured. I know this is a huge ask, but forget Trump for a moment, the question for Barr and Garland is why NO ONE was prosecuted for the Epstein matter.

How often do you divine the future? Because if you can somehow do this, I have some ideas on how we can do business together. Us mere mortals have to wait and see what people actually say before we assess what they say.

 

[NuffSaid]

Bill Barr is full of shit.

 

[j brown's body]

I never said that !
Trump actually reported epstien to the authorities, after he found out what happened to workers that epstien lured away from Trump's employment.

What I pointed out was that even Barr ( who is a rank and file GOP'er) even stated that he did not see anything linking Trump, PLUS THE FACT that if there was anything on Trump biden would have leaked it !..Anita's.

Link?

 

[j brown's body]

Barr ought to be investigated for Epstein dying on his watch.

 

[SavannahMann]

Former AG William Barr sits for deposition in House Oversight's Epstein probe

Barr is the first witness called in the Oversight Committee's investigation.

www.yahoo.com

So it's looking less likely that Trump was involved with epstein as many here are hoping !
The most enlightening statement was when Bill Bar said:
"
He said that he had never seen anything that would implicate President Trump in any of this, and that he believed, if there had been anything pertaining to President Trump, with respect to the Epstein list, that he felt like the Biden administration would have probably leaked it out.
"

Posting this so those who are still being played the fool by the media can see that they might be getting played, the fool !

Right.

Epstein, Maxwell accuser recounts Trump making late-night visit at financier’s office

A woman who has accused Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell of sexual assault is sharing an experience she had meeting President Donald Trump.

www.wdbj7.com

 

[bongsaway]

I never said that !
Trump actually reported epstien to the authorities, after he found out what happened to workers that epstien lured away from Trump's employment.

What I pointed out was that even Barr ( who is a rank and file GOP'er) even stated that he did not see anything linking Trump, PLUS THE FACT that if there was anything on Trump biden would have leaked it !.......

Barr is a proven liar. He did it with Mueller's report, telling the press, nothing to see here, move on. However that's not what the report said. If the Democrats take control of the house next election, people like barr will end up facing perjury charges.

 

[The AntiDonald]

Former AG William Barr sits for deposition in House Oversight's Epstein probe

Barr is the first witness called in the Oversight Committee's investigation.

www.yahoo.com

So it's looking less likely that Trump was involved with epstein as many here are hoping !
The most enlightening statement was when Bill Bar said:
"
He said that he had never seen anything that would implicate President Trump in any of this, and that he believed, if there had been anything pertaining to President Trump, with respect to the Epstein list, that he felt like the Biden administration would have probably leaked it out.
"

Posting this so those who are still being played the fool by the media can see that they might be getting played, the fool !

This is the moron who lied about the Mueller report in order to deceive the American people. He was questioned by a republican congress with the sole intent of protecting Trump. If you just believe Barr without question, then that confirms you are willing to protect Trump under any circumstances.

The people who need to testify are Acosta, the ex-prosecutor who handed Epstein the sweet deal and all the victims. Why aren't they calling them in? It's all smoke and mirrors and I doubt this will put an end to it. Not in my mind.

 

[TangoNoCash]

I doubt he’s going to confess to having Epstein killed.

 

[Rexedgar]

 

[The AntiDonald]

I doubt he’s going to confess to having Epstein killed.

Of course not. Anyone with half a brain cell could have predicted his testimony.