According to Trump's own logic, does a shutdown indicate that he is weak?

[Gimmesometruth]

The poster alleged that President Trump had cut all Health and nutrition services.

For this year? Was that the point made?

I would find that difficult to be true if in 2025 his administration would be paying more.

Yeah, I don't think that was the argument. You gotta quote?

 

[Gimmesometruth]

coat of Greece

that could get slippery, be careful.

 

[StillServing]

Corporations get money from the taxpayers and they themselves pay taxes. This makes them taxpayers. The idea of any taxpayer money being given to Trump of his children, associates, etc ... is offensive. If he wants a ball room, he can damn well pay for it himself.

So, I as a taxpayer sold my last house to another taxpayer so I could buy a bigger house drone another taxpayer. Does this mean taxpayers paid for my house? It’s the same logic.

 

[StillServing]

that could get slippery, be careful.

Ha! Coast of Greece with fat thumbs!

 

[StillServing]

For this year? Was that the point made?

Yeah, I don't think that was the argument. You gotta quote?

I’m going to respectfully ask you to go back through the thread on this one. The last time I responded to you concerning a response I made to another poster you responded that I was being disingenuous.

 

[Gimmesometruth]

Ha!

ha, you still can't find the poster arguing that cuts in the bill are for this year.

Not that I expected you to accept that you are sealioning, but using the "muh screen size" is rather pathetic. Demanding links and then mischaracterizing argument made is all greasy weak sauce.

 

[ColdHardTruth]

So, I as a taxpayer sold my last house to another taxpayer so I could buy a bigger house drone another taxpayer. Does this mean taxpayers paid for my house? It’s the same logic.

It's not the same logic.

Trump is a grifter who has never done anything for anybody but himself. He isn't going to build a $200 million dollar ball room and then just leave.

ANY money other than his own personal funds spent on the ballroom is COMPLETELY INAPPROPRIATE.

When the next democrat gets into the white house the rose garden will be rebuilt, and Trump and Malaria will be billed for it.

 

[Gimmesometruth]

I’m going to respectfully ask you to go back through the thread on this one.

No, my sealioning friend, you don't get to make false claims and then demand I find quotes.

The last time I responded to you concerning a response I made to another poster you responded that I was being disingenuous.

arf-arf-clap-clap

 

[StillServing]

No, my sealioning friend, you don't get to make false claims and then demand I find quotes.

Trump cut all of those services.

Seems to me if we will be paying more in healthcare and nutrition services this year (provided the clean CR is voted on), it’s had to defend that Present Trump has “cut all of those services.”

arf-arf-clap-clap

As I am sailing out of Mykonos in a suite I’m realizing that I have no need to engage in this level of conversation. I wish you well.

 

[StillServing]

It's not the same logic.

Care to explain how it is not?

 

[Gimmesometruth]

it’s had to defend that Present Trump has “cut all of those services.”

you were both speaking of the legislation passed. You are taking one thing said and conflating it with some specific comment you made.

Just stop.

 

[StillServing]

IWhen the next democrat gets into the white house the rose garden will be rebuilt, and Trump and Malaria will be billed for it.

So, should Secretary Clinton need to be billed for the renovations she made to certain rooms in the White House during her time as First Lady as much of those funds came from donations and not herself or President Clinton. I don’t think she should, but your the one making the argument.

 

[StillServing]

ANY money other than his own personal funds spent on the ballroom is COMPLETELY INAPPROPRIATE.

So we have an evolution. First the issue is taxpayers paying for renovations. Then it was corporations. Now it is anyone other than President Trump’s personal funds.

Since JFK, which President has donated al of their presidential salary?

 

[StillServing]

Katie Johnson, identified in lawsuits as “Jane Doe,” alleged in civil filings that she was repeatedly raped by Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein in Jeffrey Epstein’s New York City apartment in 1994 when she was about 13 years old; the suit was originally filed in 2016 and later dropped.

Actually no. Katie Johnson was the first pseudonym used before termed Jane Doe. The complaint, alllegedly made 22 years after its was to have happened included no evidence and the complaint was not even a sworn statement. Mysteriously, the suit was dropped days before the election.

 

[ColdHardTruth]

Actually no. Katie Johnson was the first pseudonym used before termed Jane Doe. The complaint, alllegedly made 22 years after its was to have happened included no evidence and the complaint was not even a sworn statement. Mysteriously, the suit was dropped days before the election.

Katie Johnson and her lawyer were both threatened with death.

 

[StillServing]

Katie Johnson and her lawyer were both threatened with death.

And what evidence or sworn statement supports any of this?

 

[ColdHardTruth]

And what evidence or sworn statement supports any of this?

So many of you have left comments or reached out directly about Katie Johnson, the Jane Doe who accused President Trump of raping her at Jeffrey Epstein’s Upper East Side townhouse in 1994, when she was just 13 years old. She later dropped the lawsuit on November 4, 2016, just days before the election. Her lawyer said she had received threats.

Katie Johnson’s lawyer: ‘There’s No Doubt in My Mind She Told the Truth’

He spent days questioning her, hired investigators, and filed the suit. Nearly a decade later, he’s breaking his silence about what he saw.

www.tarapalmeri.com

https://x.com/Nancy__Dillon

“Jane Doe has received numerous threats today as have all the Trump accusers that I’ve represented,” attorney Lisa Bloom said before a throng of reporters. “She is living in fear, she has decided that she is too afraid to show her face. She has been here all day, ready to do it, but unfortunately she is in terrible fear. So we’re going to have to reschedule.”

Donald Trump Rape Accuser Cancels News Conference Over 'Numerous Threats'

"She has decided she is too afraid to show her face," lawyer Lisa Bloom says of woman who claims she was 13 years old at time of alleged incident

www.thewrap.com

ALL of those Dumpytits raped were threatened.

Defending Dumpletits is a bad look. You should stop.

 

[GIJane]

Yet you felt obligated to post in a poll thread.

You don't even have the balls to show your true side. Don't criticize others.

 

[StillServing]

So many of you have left comments or reached out directly about Katie Johnson, the Jane Doe who accused President Trump of raping her at Jeffrey Epstein’s Upper East Side townhouse in 1994, when she was just 13 years old. She later dropped the lawsuit on November 4, 2016, just days before the election. Her lawyer said she had received threats.

Katie Johnson’s lawyer: ‘There’s No Doubt in My Mind She Told the Truth’

He spent days questioning her, hired investigators, and filed the suit. Nearly a decade later, he’s breaking his silence about what he saw.

www.tarapalmeri.com

View attachment 67593379

https://x.com/Nancy__Dillon

“Jane Doe has received numerous threats today as have all the Trump accusers that I’ve represented,” attorney Lisa Bloom said before a throng of reporters. “She is living in fear, she has decided that she is too afraid to show her face. She has been here all day, ready to do it, but unfortunately she is in terrible fear. So we’re going to have to reschedule.”

Donald Trump Rape Accuser Cancels News Conference Over 'Numerous Threats'

"She has decided she is too afraid to show her face," lawyer Lisa Bloom says of woman who claims she was 13 years old at time of alleged incident

www.thewrap.com

ALL of those Dumpytits raped were threatened.

Defending Dumpletits is a bad look. You should stop.

I’m not actually defending anyone. It’s just a matter that when there are no facts, there wasn’t even a sworn statement, that it is irresponsible to assume the guilt of anyone. If there are verifiable facts, then sure we can debate. He said, she said (especially when no one actually even knows who the she is) simply isn’t enough.

 

[ColdHardTruth]

I’m not actually defending anyone. It’s just a matter that when there are no facts, there wasn’t even a sworn statement, that it is irresponsible to assume the guilt of anyone. If there are verifiable facts, then sure we can debate. He said, she said (especially when no one actually even knows who the she is) simply isn’t enough.

Yes, there was.

Katie Johnson was under oath at her deposition. That counts as a sworn statement.

Her life was threatened, as was the life of his daughter, and this likely happened at the request of dumpytits.

He is well known for this and has done it many times.

 

[StillServing]

Yes, there was.

Katie Johnson was under oath at her deposition. That counts as a sworn statement.

Her life was threatened, as was the life of his daughter, and this likely happened at the request of dumpytits.

He is well known for this and has done it many times.

But that’s why I have no interest in entertaining this accusation. There was NO disposition. There is no signed sworn statement.

 

[ColdHardTruth]

But that’s why I have no interest in entertaining this accusation. There was NO disposition. There is no signed sworn statement.

Yes, there was.

She was placed under oath at her deposition. That is sworn testimony.

Trump is a well-known sexual predator. Ask any of the 28 women he victimized.

Trump says the girls are lying. Trump is a known liar who NEVER tells the truth.

I believe the women.

I DO NOT believe Trump.

 

[StillServing]

Yes, there was.

She was placed under oath at her deposition. That is sworn testimony.

Trump is a well-known sexual predator. Ask any of the 28 women he victimized.

Trump says the girls are lying. Trump is a known liar who NEVER tells the truth.

I believe the women.

I DO NOT believe Trump.

In a civil case, a disposition can not occur until the service process has occurred, a rule 26(f) conference has been held, and a judge had set dates for depositions. None of these steps were done as the case was dismissed early.

There was no disposition.

 

[ColdHardTruth]

In a civil case, a disposition can not occur until the service process has occurred, a rule 26(f) conference has been held, and a judge had set dates for depositions. None of these steps were done as the case was dismissed early.

There was no disposition.

The case was valid and was dismissed because Johnson and her lawyer were both threatened with death.

You are making excuses for Trump. You need to stop doing that.

Trump is guilty.

 

[Gimmesometruth]

And what evidence or sworn statement supports any of this?

Such a weird flex to deny that Katie was receiving death threats. Is the idea that opponents of Donny do not get death threats, that various MAGA supporters do not make death threats, that most/all accusations are just made up to make Don look bad?