• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Florida's free kill law may be repealed (1 Viewer)

Safiel

DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 27, 2023
Messages
1,072
Reaction score
1,260
Gender
Male
Florida's free kill law prohibits anybody other than a spouse or child under 25 of a medical malpractice victim from suing.

The Florida Legislature is trying to repeal the law, but member's have added a poison pill in the form of economic damage caps in an attempt to derail the legislation.

Hopefully, the Legislature will be able to pass a clean repeal of the free kill law and allow the adult children of medical malpractice victims to gain justice for their deceased parents.

 
Florida's free kill law prohibits anybody other than a spouse or child under 25 of a medical malpractice victim from suing.

The Florida Legislature is trying to repeal the law, but member's have added a poison pill in the form of economic damage caps in an attempt to derail the legislation.

Hopefully, the Legislature will be able to pass a clean repeal of the free kill law and allow the adult children of medical malpractice victims to gain justice for their deceased parents.

This is like a no brainer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bum
Florida's free kill law prohibits anybody other than a spouse or child under 25 of a medical malpractice victim from suing.

The Florida Legislature is trying to repeal the law, but member's have added a poison pill in the form of economic damage caps in an attempt to derail the legislation.

Hopefully, the Legislature will be able to pass a clean repeal of the free kill law and allow the adult children of medical malpractice victims to gain justice for their deceased parents.

How does money given to adult children of parents who've suffered medical malpractice bring justice to anything? Does it bring the parent back to life? Let the judicial system deal with the malpractice and be done with it. I find it personally disgusting for adult family members to profit from a parent's tragic death.
 
How does money given to adult children of parents who've suffered medical malpractice bring justice to anything? Does it bring the parent back to life? Let the judicial system deal with the malpractice and be done with it. I find it personally disgusting for adult family members to profit from a parent's tragic death.
Family members often bear the brunt of the high medical costs. I mean they pay it because family so since the patient cant be compensated the next of kin.
 
How does money given to adult children of parents who've suffered medical malpractice bring justice to anything? Does it bring the parent back to life? Let the judicial system deal with the malpractice and be done with it. I find it personally disgusting for adult family members to profit from a parent's tragic death.

The judicial system almost NEVER deals with it or even addresses.

Unless the malpractice rises to over the top ridiculousness like this guy.


The doctor removed the liver instead of the spleen, killing the patient on the table.

Still "under investigation."

If all was right with the world, this guy would already be tried, convicted and doing 5 to 15 years for manslaughter.

In this case, since he has a wife, the free kill law does not apply.

Sometimes, the ONLY way to get rid of a moron doctor is to repeatedly hit them with large malpractice awards, until they become uninsurable and are forced to surrender their medical licenses.

Malpractice suits are a tool to force bad doctors out of practice and the free kill law unconscionably blunts this necessary tool.
 
The judicial system almost NEVER deals with it or even addresses.

Unless the malpractice rises to over the top ridiculousness like this guy.


The doctor removed the liver instead of the spleen, killing the patient on the table.

Still "under investigation."

If all was right with the world, this guy would already be tried, convicted and doing 5 to 15 years for manslaughter.

In this case, since he has a wife, the free kill law does not apply.

Sometimes, the ONLY way to get rid of a moron doctor is to repeatedly hit them with large malpractice awards, until they become uninsurable and are forced to surrender their medical licenses.

Malpractice suits are a tool to force bad doctors out of practice and the free kill law unconscionably blunts this necessary tool.
Seems like we might want to consider adjusting our systems so that bad doctors can't get away with malpractice that much.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom