Flight93wheres waldo, plane, something?

[creativedreams]

the exact shaped hole for the flight 93 crash is shown on USGS images to have been there before 9/11

no plane........nothing!.......:shrug:

 

[creativedreams]

:shrug:

 

[americanwoman]

After seeing the recent Buffalo plane crash pictures and all the stuff left over, even after exploding, it has made me wonder.....

 

[Thorgasm]

After seeing the recent Buffalo plane crash pictures and all the stuff left over, even after exploding, it has made me wonder.....

They didn't crash at the same velocity.

 

[lawshume]

I remember reporters complaining they were being unfairly
kept away from the 93 crash site.

The only people allowed near it were people that were
approved by those in charge - a very select group.

Would anyone expect a defection by any of those in
the select group? If so, why ?

Even Ted Olsen sticks with the approved story even though
his wife was supposedly killed in the Pentagon crash. He
doesn't seem to have any doubts about the media story.
He's no defector. He must know.

 

[creativedreams]

After seeing the recent Buffalo plane crash pictures and all the stuff left over, even after exploding, it has made me wonder.....

There are live news cast videos of the first rescue workers on the scene that said there was nothing there in terms of plain debris. I don't have time to find them right now but they are of credible scources with documented workers.

It's speculated by many respected people that they wanted a hero factor in 9/11. I'm not sure what to believe but everything about that day is disturbing in many incriminating aspects...

 

[Arch Enemy]

Some people deny the holocaust's evidence.

 

[creativedreams]

Some people deny the holocaust's evidence.

Slight difference here...no plane no debris no evidence.

No reporters were allowed within seeing distance of the scene

Just another amazing coincidence for 9/11.... flight 93 just happend to hit exactly where there already was an indent in the ground proven to be there before 9/11 by dated material from USGS...

 

[Arch Enemy]

Slight difference here...no plane no debris no evidence.

No reporters were allowed within seeing distance of the scene

Just another amazing coincidence for 9/11.... flight 93 just happend to hit exactly where there already was an indent in the ground proven to be there before 9/11 by dated material from USGS...

Honestly, I do not believe in the stories of Flight 93. I do not think there was an onboard, and i do not think it "crashed". To me, it makes more sense that it was blown out of the air.
I remember reading somewhere, back when I was obsessive about 9/11 that there were opportunities to blow up the 2nd jet that hit the WTC, however, nobody could really give the go-ahead to firing on it.

 

[creativedreams]

Honestly, I do not believe in the stories of Flight 93. I do not think there was an onboard, and i do not think it "crashed". To me, it makes more sense that it was blown out of the air.
I remember reading somewhere, back when I was obsessive about 9/11 that there were opportunities to blow up the 2nd jet that hit the WTC, however, nobody could really give the go-ahead to firing on it.

I recall the day things were taking place how it was stated on the radio that flight 93 was being trailed by scrambled jets and it was believed to be heading for the white house.

Minutes later on the radio there were witness reports of a flash or fireball with the plane and then later I had disbelief in the official story of the crash.

Now I have more questions than ever on every aspect? Who knows?