- Joined
- Nov 12, 2013
- Messages
- 4,824
- Reaction score
- 6,352
- Location
- Atheist Utopia aka Reality
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
The purpose of this chapter is to express the state's interest in promoting men's health; ensure Texas men experience safe and healthy elective vasectomies, Viagra utilizations, colonoscopies procedures, and men's health experiences; ensure a doctor's right to invoke their personal, moralistic, or religious beliefs in refusing to perform an elective vasectomy or prescribe Viagra; and promote fully- abstinent sexual relations or occasional masturbatory emissions inside health care and medical facilities, as a means of the healthiest way to ensure men's health.
A man would face a $100 penalty for each emission made outside of a vagina or medical facility. Such an emission would be considered "an act against an unborn child, and failing to preserve the sanctity of life," according to the legislation.
LOLOLOL House Bill 4260 :lamo
Why should women be the only targets. 400 million wasted every time...think of all the children wasted....
Every time a woman has her period she should be fined too! Every egg is precious.
As long the dems don 't vote on it 49 times...
Is this....is this a joke?
This has to be a joke.
No more joke than having a women prodded before being allowed an abortion. Look it's ridiculous I know but so are the measures some conservatives take in regards to abortion methods. This is the response to idiotic conservative methods with abortions. Is it productive? No. However neither are most conservative anti abortion methods.
Is this....is this a joke?
This has to be a joke.
Is this....is this a joke?
This has to be a joke.
Reads like a story from the Onion. Surely that can't be right.
All she ended up doing here was making herself look ignorant of human biology. She seriously needs to open a biology book sometime. I understand she probably enjoys the troll argument "all sperm are sacred", but she should have considered that it's ignorant and makes no real point.
Is this....is this a joke?
This has to be a joke.
Is this....is this a joke?
This has to be a joke.
And how does forcing a woman to be prodded make sense?
She’s trying to do her job around a bunch of zealots and idiots like Republican Rep. Tony Tinderholt who proposed a bill that would charge both the abortion provider and the woman receiving an abortion with murder. You read that right. So to state Rep. Farrar, we support your fight against the saddest examples of the male gender.
Actually it's not. But what it is is making a mockery of the dip**** hard right legislators who are misogynists/religious pandering ****ers in our State of Texas, which seems to be the home of some of our nation's most cuckoo extremist hard righters.
Are pro-life women misogynists too?
In this case, most of the Texas legislators who are women are the most vocal about their beliefs and I assure you they are linked to the religious organizations who are filling up their election collection plates.
Is that a yes?
Troll legislation shouldn't be permitted.
Regardless, this **** here is retarded:
Sperm is a reproductive cell, not a growing human organism. Trying to compare sperm to the unborn is flat out retarded.
Never said it did. What I said is that she is comparing things that are not comparable and making herself look ignorant in the process. At nearly every step of the way she showed zero understanding of what she was talking about.
All she ended up doing here was making herself look ignorant of human biology. She seriously needs to open a biology book sometime. I understand she probably enjoys the troll argument "all sperm are sacred", but she should have considered that it's ignorant and makes no real point.
She looks no more ignorant than the folks on the right that made into a law a woman being prodded against her will when she chooses to have an abortion.
It is called reductio ad absurdium it is a logical device to show how stupid your opponents arguments are, by doing something equally absurd to point it out.
Then she might want to learn biology so can make an argument that is equally absurd.
They didn't show ignorance in biology with their move, while she did.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?