• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fighting Erupts in Tripoli

Is Our tyrant better than their "tyrant" ?

"Uzbekistan's Stalinist strongman, Islam Karimov, brutally clamped down on a mass demonstration in Andijan against corruption and arbitrary detentions in May 2005, killing 500 and wounding 2,000, but Washington echoed the Uzbek government's claim that it was the handiwork of "Islamic terrorists".

Karimov, at the time of the tulip-revolution-inspired stirrings, had been the US's staunchest ally in the war on terrorism in central Asia, an insurance policy against democratisation pressures."


Democratisation, NGOs and "colour revolutions" | openDemocracy
 
Not to give into a lot of fabrications and truth-stretching some people are using, I just want to say that their seems to be this consensus that if everyone is saying something, then it must be true. However, many people argued that the Gulf of Tonkin incident occurred, when it was in reality false. Everyone said that Iraq had WMDs, we all know now that that was false. Many argued that the overthrow of the shah in Iran was due to the people, when it wasn't. In 1962, the US was planning to launch terrorist attacks on US soil as an excuse to blame Cuba (see here as well) and if that had occurred, everyone would have been blaming Cuba but that would not have been true.

My point being that we need to look at things from outside the box, just because everyone is saying something doesn't mean is true.
 
Just heard on NPR that some Italian journalists have been kidnapped. Yesterday I was watching coverage and saw journalists right in the middle of the fighting. I find it highly irresponsible for networks to put reporters at risk. They do the same during hurricanes. Putting reporters at risk is not better coverage.
 
So...Syria huh? And Bahrain? Saudi?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…