- Joined
- Mar 7, 2018
- Messages
- 62,625
- Reaction score
- 19,350
- Location
- Lower Mainland of BC
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
Evidence is not something Trump and his Cult do well. Mostly they just throw out accusations and troll over Twitter.
From United Press International
Federal judge orders Trump campaign to provide evidence of Pa. voter fraud
Aug. 13 (UPI) -- A federal judge in Pennsylvania on Thursday ordered the Trump campaign and the Republican party to produce evidence of vote-by-mail fraud in the state.
District Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan called on President Donald Trump's re-election campaign to produce evidence supporting his claims of voter fraud in the state by Friday after it sued to ban dropboxes for mail ballots at county elections offices, CNN reproted.
"The Court finds that instances of voter fraud are relevant to the claims and defenses in this case," Ranjan wrote.
The Democratic Party and the Sierra Club wrote to the court on Wednesday requesting information and documents detailing how the Republican Party and the Trump campaign determined the possibility of fraud, particularly related to the use of dropboxes, ballot collection and mail-in ballots.
Lawyers representing the Democrats wrote that the Trump campaign "should not be permitted to raise such spectacular fraud-related claims, particularly in this national climate."
COMMENT:-[/indent]
I don't suppose that a note from Mr. Trump that says
"I am the President of the United States of America and a stable genius who has a talent for these things.
My gut tells me that there is massive voter fraud in support of the Deep State conspiracy the existence of which is verified by the inherently reliable "QAnon".
So THERE!"
is going to be enough to convince that wacko, loony, crazy, left-wing, liberal, socialist, pinko, commie, activist, so-called "judge" who only wants to overturn the results of the 2016 election.
What do you think?
From United Press International
Federal judge orders Trump campaign to provide evidence of Pa. voter fraud
Aug. 13 (UPI) -- A federal judge in Pennsylvania on Thursday ordered the Trump campaign and the Republican party to produce evidence of vote-by-mail fraud in the state.
District Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan called on President Donald Trump's re-election campaign to produce evidence supporting his claims of voter fraud in the state by Friday after it sued to ban dropboxes for mail ballots at county elections offices, CNN reproted.
"The Court finds that instances of voter fraud are relevant to the claims and defenses in this case," Ranjan wrote.
The Democratic Party and the Sierra Club wrote to the court on Wednesday requesting information and documents detailing how the Republican Party and the Trump campaign determined the possibility of fraud, particularly related to the use of dropboxes, ballot collection and mail-in ballots.
Lawyers representing the Democrats wrote that the Trump campaign "should not be permitted to raise such spectacular fraud-related claims, particularly in this national climate."
COMMENT:-[/indent]
I don't suppose that a note from Mr. Trump that says
"I am the President of the United States of America and a stable genius who has a talent for these things.
My gut tells me that there is massive voter fraud in support of the Deep State conspiracy the existence of which is verified by the inherently reliable "QAnon".
So THERE!"
is going to be enough to convince that wacko, loony, crazy, left-wing, liberal, socialist, pinko, commie, activist, so-called "judge" who only wants to overturn the results of the 2016 election.
What do you think?
I dont have a problem with the judge asking that question but he should also be asking the other side what evidence they have that the votes are authentic. Both sides should be asked to prove their positions.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Is there a problem with providing a judge this absolute record so that he can review it?The so called 'other side' as you say, has a clean historical record of an absolute absence of voter fraud. What evidence do the accusers have beside their feverish desire to suppress the vote?
They are the ones bringing the case before the court, therefore they need to demonstrate that the case is worth hearing.I dont have a problem with the judge asking that question but he should also be asking the other side what evidence they have that the votes are authentic. Both sides should be asked to prove their positions.
I dont have a problem with the judge asking that question but he should also be asking the other side what evidence they have that the votes are authentic. Both sides should be asked to prove their positions.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
This wasn't spelled out, but they appear to be Amici curiae (friends of the court).Why is a federal judge reading requests from parties not part of the case, let alone issuing orders based on them?
They are the ones bringing the case before the court, therefore they need to demonstrate that the case is worth hearing.
I dont have a problem with the judge asking that question but he should also be asking the other side what evidence they have that the votes are authentic. Both sides should be asked to prove their positions.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
From United Press International
Federal judge orders Trump campaign to provide evidence of Pa. voter fraud
Aug. 13 (UPI) -- A federal judge in Pennsylvania on Thursday ordered the Trump campaign and the Republican party to produce evidence of vote-by-mail fraud in the state.
District Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan called on President Donald Trump's re-election campaign to produce evidence supporting his claims of voter fraud in the state by Friday after it sued to ban dropboxes for mail ballots at county elections offices, CNN reproted.
"The Court finds that instances of voter fraud are relevant to the claims and defenses in this case," Ranjan wrote.
The Democratic Party and the Sierra Club wrote to the court on Wednesday requesting information and documents detailing how the Republican Party and the Trump campaign determined the possibility of fraud, particularly related to the use of dropboxes, ballot collection and mail-in ballots.
Lawyers representing the Democrats wrote that the Trump campaign "should not be permitted to raise such spectacular fraud-related claims, particularly in this national climate."
COMMENT:-[/indent]
I don't suppose that a note from Mr. Trump that says
"I am the President of the United States of America and a stable genius who has a talent for these things.
My gut tells me that there is massive voter fraud in support of the Deep State conspiracy the existence of which is verified by the inherently reliable "QAnon".
So THERE!"
is going to be enough to convince that wacko, loony, crazy, left-wing, liberal, socialist, pinko, commie, activist, so-called "judge" who only wants to overturn the results of the 2016 election.
What do you think?
Trump: 'Well, I had the greatest and most magnificent win in Pennsylvania ever, how could it not be fraud?'
Uh, that doesn’t make any sense.
The Trump cabal is claiming fraud, and not providing any evidence to support their claim at all. Why should the “other side” be involved in it. It’s Trump’s claim, nobody else’s.
You guys are really running out of material.
Vote by mail has been going on for over a century and no evidence of fraud. There, that is proof enough.I dont have a problem with the judge asking that question but he should also be asking the other side what evidence they have that the votes are authentic. Both sides should be asked to prove their positions.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Evidence is not something Trump and his Cult do well. Mostly they just throw out accusations and troll over Twitter.
From United Press International
Federal judge orders Trump campaign to provide evidence of Pa. voter fraud
Aug. 13 (UPI) -- A federal judge in Pennsylvania on Thursday ordered the Trump campaign and the Republican party to produce evidence of vote-by-mail fraud in the state.
District Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan called on President Donald Trump's re-election campaign to produce evidence supporting his claims of voter fraud in the state by Friday after it sued to ban dropboxes for mail ballots at county elections offices, CNN reproted.
"The Court finds that instances of voter fraud are relevant to the claims and defenses in this case," Ranjan wrote.
The Democratic Party and the Sierra Club wrote to the court on Wednesday requesting information and documents detailing how the Republican Party and the Trump campaign determined the possibility of fraud, particularly related to the use of dropboxes, ballot collection and mail-in ballots.
Lawyers representing the Democrats wrote that the Trump campaign "should not be permitted to raise such spectacular fraud-related claims, particularly in this national climate."
COMMENT:-[/indent]
I don't suppose that a note from Mr. Trump that says
"I am the President of the United States of America and a stable genius who has a talent for these things.
My gut tells me that there is massive voter fraud in support of the Deep State conspiracy the existence of which is verified by the inherently reliable "QAnon".
So THERE!"
is going to be enough to convince that wacko, loony, crazy, left-wing, liberal, socialist, pinko, commie, activist, so-called "judge" who only wants to overturn the results of the 2016 election.
What do you think?
Trump had to disband his previous voter fraud commission or whatever it was called because no fraud was found.
I dont have a problem with the judge asking that question but he should also be asking the other side what evidence they have that the votes are authentic. Both sides should be asked to prove their positions.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
I dont have a problem with the judge asking that question but he should also be asking the other side what evidence they have that the votes are authentic. Both sides should be asked to prove their positions.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Ranjan? Hmm......not an American family name........reminiscent of Curiel.....:thinking:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?