If that was true Paul would not have been successful in his reasoning with people...we would have no success today, in our preaching work, yet the numbers continue to grow...There is no logic or reasoning as the Bible is based on Faith, not intellectual reasoning. Why do you think many scientists are atheists?
You're assuming I like Paul. I do not. I subscribe to the Jefferson philosophy of Jesus being the only words worth teaching and hearing.If that was true Paul would not have been successful in his reasoning with people...we would have no success today, in our preaching work, yet the numbers continue to grow...
"They now traveled through Am·phipʹo·lis and Ap·ol·loʹni·a and came to Thes·sa·lo·niʹca,+ where there was a synagogue of the Jews. So according to Paul’s custom+ he went inside to them, and for three sabbaths he reasoned with them from the Scriptures, explaining and proving by references that it was necessary for the Christ to suffer+ and to rise from the dead,+ saying: “This is the Christ, this Jesus whom I am proclaiming to you.” As a result, some of them became believers and associated themselves with Paul and Silas,+ and so did a great multitude of the Greeks who worshipped God, along with quite a few of the principal women." Acts 17:1-4
Well then, no one reasoned better than Jesus Christ...You're assuming I like Paul. I do not. I subscribe to the Jefferson philosophy of Jesus being the only words worth teaching and hearing.
In Genesis, a number of curses were described with the Fall of Man. None of them involved a sudden need to defecate, or the addition of organ systems and orifices to the body. Adam and Eve both ate of the fruit trees, and, one might presume, therefore had a need to defecate.
But before the Fall, they knew nothing of Good or Evil. They lived in bliss, without suffering. Without tripping over during a dance move and getting a snootful of something they didn't know to dig a latrine to deal with. (How often did it rain in the Garden anyway? Did they have rainy days?)
The AI dealt with this by saying that the poop didn't stink. No bacteria, no corruption. It cited Saint Thomas Aquinas but, because they're trying to start pushing people onto a pro tier, they only linked to bloggers like this guy.
To my mind that raises other questions. I mean, if Adam and Eve were really pooping peach jam with a pleasant odor and texture, were they sitting around eating each other's excrement? They wouldn't have been ashamed to, after all.
Now I could go further afield with doctrine... "Behold, the man has become like one of us, to know good and evil." Does that really mean that Adam and Eve became aware when an action was bad, so that beforehand Adam could have bashed Eve in the head with a stick and not felt anything about it? Or does it mean that they became capable of doing the wrong thing, and therefore "knowing" (participating in) both good and evil? Now if that were the case, then pre-Fall, feces could have stunk, bacteria could already have existed, but it was always - always - dealt with in a responsible way, because the humans couldn't sin. Even babies, if born in that state, might have gotten up to relieve themselves responsibly, even if they didn't know why or have a word for the facilities they used, or else the parents would have known always in advance how to deal with their needs in a timely way. But since the original sin happened, that implies some kind of special exception for it, possibly due to Satan being an angel?
The Bible says Jesus was perfect. I feel Jesus would have never thought of himself that way. I HIGLY doubt he ever considered if there was crap in the Garden of Eden. This is as ridiculous a topic as how many angels can fit on the head of a pen.Well then, no one reasoned better than Jesus Christ...
Jesus made remarkable use of questions. He often did so even when it would have been less time-consuming just to tell his listeners the point. Why, then, did he ask questions? Occasionally, he used piercing questions to expose the motives of his opposers, thereby silencing them. (Matthew 12:24-30; 21:23-27; 22:41-46) In many cases, however, Jesus took the time to ask questions in order to convey truths, to get his listeners to express what was in their hearts, and to stimulate and train the thinking of his disciples. Let us examine two examples, both involving the apostle Peter.
In his ministry, Jesus often made use of another effective teaching method—hyperbole. This is an intentional exaggeration for the purpose of emphasis. With hyperbole, Jesus created mental pictures that were hard to forget. Let us consider a few examples.
In the Sermon on the Mount, when stressing the need to “stop judging” others, Jesus said: “Why, then, do you look at the straw in your brother’s eye, but do not consider the rafter in your own eye?” (Matthew 7:1-3) Can you visualize the scene? Someone who is prone to be critical offers to extract a mere straw from his brother’s “eye.” The critic would be claiming that his brother could not see matters clearly enough so as to render acceptable judgments. But the critic’s own ability to judge is impaired by a “rafter”—a log or beam that might be used to support a roof. What an unforgettable way to stress how foolish it is to criticize the minor faults of our brothers when we may have major faults of our own!
On another occasion, Jesus denounced the Pharisees as “blind guides, who strain out the gnat but gulp down the camel.” (Matthew 23:24) This was a particularly powerful use of hyperbole. Why? The contrast between a tiny gnat and a camel, which was one of the largest animals known to Jesus’ hearers, was striking. It is estimated that it would take up to 70 million gnats to equal the weight of an average camel! Also, Jesus knew that the Pharisees strained their wine through a cloth sieve. Those sticklers for rules did that in order to avoid swallowing a gnat and thereby become ceremonially unclean. Yet, they figuratively gulped down the camel, which was also unclean. (Leviticus 11:4, 21-24) Jesus’ point was clear. The Pharisees meticulously complied with the smallest of the Law’s requirements, but they disregarded the weightier matters—“justice and mercy and faithfulness.” (Matthew 23:23) How clearly Jesus exposed them for what they were!
With his perfect mind, Jesus was a master at reasoning logically with people. Yet, he never misused this ability. In his teaching, he always employed his keen mental faculties to advance truth. At times, he used powerful logic to refute the false charges of his religious opposers. In many instances, he used logical reasoning in order to teach his disciples important lessons.
https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/2002642
Have you read how Jesus talked about himself in The Gospels? Its not in a hesitant way. In fact, he got into a lot of trouble with the local powers because of how he talked about himself.The Bible says Jesus was perfect. I feel Jesus would have never thought of himself that way. I HIGLY doubt he ever considered if there was crap in the Garden of Eden. This is as ridiculous a topic as how many angels can fit on the head of a pen.
The answer is unknowable.
Of course there was crap in the garden...where there's living creatures, there's crap...what goes in much come out...but I agree...stupid topic...The Bible says Jesus was perfect. I feel Jesus would have never thought of himself that way. I HIGLY doubt he ever considered if there was crap in the Garden of Eden. This is as ridiculous a topic as how many angels can fit on the head of a pen.
The answer is unknowable.
In Genesis, a number of curses were described with the Fall of Man. None of them involved a sudden need to defecate, or the addition of organ systems and orifices to the body.
There is no logic or reasoning as the Bible is based on Faith, not intellectual reasoning. Why do you think many scientists are atheists?
I said nothing about addition. Didn't mention subtraction.Lol - God did describe where Eve was taken from. RIBS!
I said nothing about addition. Didn't mention subtraction.
It wouldn't have made much sense to describe a male childbirth using the usual organs, after all.
The text is a description of an archetype, and translation is dicey even for much more recent words. Jesus gave people one prayer, and there's a word in it that nobody knows what it means - a "hapax legomenon". I have no qualifications dealing with Hebrew, but I imagine the use of the word "rib" in Genesis could mean a lot of different things. Think how we use the word figuratively to mean the reinforcements on a ship or patterns on a rubber... I bet you could even argue it was really an old term for "DNA"![]()
The text is a description of an archetype, and translation is dicey even for much more recent words
Well, even if Adam had a big nose and Eve had a little nose, then there must be some way that the world now has all shapes and sizes of noses. Creators create ... it's what they do.In this current culture, I suppose genders will be dicey to those who are confused what genders they belong to.![]()
Well, even if Adam had a big nose and Eve had a little nose, then there must be some way that the world now has all shapes and sizes of noses. Creators create ... it's what they do.![]()
I said nothing about addition. Didn't mention subtraction.
It wouldn't have made much sense to describe a male childbirth using the usual organs, after all.
The text is a description of an archetype, and translation is dicey even for much more recent words. Jesus gave people one prayer, and there's a word in it that nobody knows what it means - a "hapax legomenon". I have no qualifications dealing with Hebrew, but I imagine the use of the word "rib" in Genesis could mean a lot of different things. Think how we use the word figuratively to mean the reinforcements on a ship or patterns on a rubber... I bet you could even argue it was really an old term for "DNA"![]()
Again. Faith. One has to believe in the Bible by FAITH to accept what the Scriptures say. Just you bring satan's name into the conversation does not mean you're right.That's a common misconception from those who lack understanding of the Bible.
In fact, The Scriptures is based on logic........after all, who gave us intelligence? The freedom to discern?
You think Satan has no agent in the science community?
Or everywhere, including churches?
Wherever he can cause confusion and draw people away from God?
Btw, many atheist scientists had converted to becoming believers...................based on what they'd discovered.
That's a common misconception from those who lack understanding of the Bible.
In fact, The Scriptures is based on logic........after all, who gave us intelligence? The freedom to discern?
Again. Faith. One has to believe in the Bible by FAITH to accept what the Scriptures say. Just you bring satan's name into the conversation does not mean you're right.
There is no logic or reasoning as the Bible is based on Faith,
There is no logic or reasoning as the Bible is based on Faith, not intellectual reasoning. Why do you think many scientists are atheists?
This is almost laughable. The wisdom of man is foolishness to God. Read 1 Corinthians 10-15. It is man’s wisdom
That is built on logic, rational thinking, intelligence, and science
There is a difference between intelligence and blind faith. They are not mutually exclusive. One can be very intelligent and still believe in the Bible (by Faith) without trying to apply science to something that isn't scientifically explainable.. By Faith, it simply ............is.Posts #43 and #44.
Here is 1 Cor 10: 15
1 Cor 10 (NASB)
14 Therefore, my beloved, flee from idolatry.
15 I speak as to wise people; you then, judge what I say.
1 Cor 10 (ESV)
14 Therefore, my beloved, flee from idolatry.
15 I speak as to sensible people; judge for yourselves what I say.
1 Cor 10:15 (NIV)
14 Therefore, my dear friends, flee from idolatry.
15 I speak to sensible people; judge for yourselves what I say.
1 Cor 10:15 (KJV)
14 Wherefore, my dearly beloved, flee from idolatry.
15I speak as to wise men; judge ye what I say.
What do you use when you make an assessment, or when you judge or weigh or understand something?
Isn't it.................INTELLIGENCE?
Enough said.
What Bible do you use?
There is a difference between intelligence and blind faith. They are not mutually exclusive. One can be very intelligent and still believe in the Bible (by Faith) without trying to apply science to something that isn't scientifically explainable.. By Faith, it simply ............is.
This is almost laughable. The wisdom of man is foolishness to God. Read 1 Corinthians 10-15. It is man’s wisdom
That is built on logic, rational thinking, intelligence, and science. The Beatitudes are without logic as is turning the cheek. Are you implying that Christians have higher intelligence because God gave them intelligence ?
The Beatitudes are without logic as is turning the cheek.
Are you implying that Christians have higher intelligence because God gave them intelligence ?