• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FBI has no evidence Epstein trafficked girls to others

S

Surrealistik

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
12,139
Reaction score
8,047
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
www.washingtontimes.com

FBI has no evidence Epstein trafficked girls to others

The FBI’s truncated investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein found no evidence that he trafficked women or girls to other people, and only showed he procured them for himself, bureau Director Kash Patel told Congress on Tuesday.
www.washingtontimes.com www.washingtontimes.com

Paywall bypass: https://archive.ph/C25sj

The FBI’s truncated investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein found no evidence that he trafficked women or girls to other people, and only showed he procured them for himself, bureau Director Kash Patel told Congress on Tuesday.

He said the FBI’s probe was limited to only a few years around the turn of the century, based on a deal led by then-U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta, who oversaw the case that led to Epstein pleading guilty to a sex trafficking and sex solicitation charge in state court in exchange for a deal that he not face federal prosecution.

The evidence the FBI developed during that probe didn’t show Epstein procured women for others.
Click to expand...

Blatant, stone cold bullshit.

The best case scenario is Kash is being overtly particular about the wording in asserting it means that Epstein did not procure minors to put into the ongoing possession of other people... which is of course saying much of nothing and needs not be explicated unless the idea was to *imply* that Epstein did not provide or otherwise make available underage girls to others for sexual exploitation without actually saying so; something that is obviously and completely ludicrous. Even this is blatantly very suspicious and guilty behaviour on Kash's part and screams govt coverup.
 
Last edited:
Surrealistik said:
www.washingtontimes.com

FBI has no evidence Epstein trafficked girls to others

The FBI’s truncated investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein found no evidence that he trafficked women or girls to other people, and only showed he procured them for himself, bureau Director Kash Patel told Congress on Tuesday.
www.washingtontimes.com www.washingtontimes.com

Paywall bypass: https://archive.ph/C25sj



Blatant, stone cold bullshit.

The best case scenario is Kash is being overtly particular about the wording in asserting it means that Epstein did not procure minors to put into the ongoing possession of other people... which is of course saying much of nothing and needs not be explicated unless the idea was to suspiciously *imply* that Epstein did not provide or otherwise make available underage girls to others for sexual exploitation without actually saying so; something that is obviously and completely ludicrous.
Click to expand...

The case is closed.

MAGA.
 
Surrealistik said:
www.washingtontimes.com

FBI has no evidence Epstein trafficked girls to others

The FBI’s truncated investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein found no evidence that he trafficked women or girls to other people, and only showed he procured them for himself, bureau Director Kash Patel told Congress on Tuesday.
www.washingtontimes.com www.washingtontimes.com

Paywall bypass: https://archive.ph/C25sj



Blatant, stone cold bullshit.

The best case scenario is Kash is being overtly particular about the wording in asserting it means that Epstein did not procure minors to put into the ongoing possession of other people... which is of course saying much of nothing and needs not be explicated unless the idea was to *imply* that Epstein did not provide or otherwise make available underage girls to others for sexual exploitation without actually saying so; something that is obviously and completely ludicrous. Even this is obviously very suspicious and guilty behaviour on Kash's part and screams govt coverup.
Click to expand...
Far right, no credibility propaganda mill, The Washington Times, is dutifully presenting MAGAt lies, as usual.
 
RaleBulgarian said:
Far right, no credibility propaganda mill, The Washington Times, is dutifully presenting MAGAt lies, as usual.
Click to expand...
No better source than one among those that should be friendliest to Kash et al to quote his obvious bullshit; gets ahead of the off-hand dismissals over 'bias'.
 
Kash sure does sound like a weesely defense lawyer here which is very telling. Like someone annoyed they even have to talk about this, not like I would talking about these types of crimes.

So Epstein didn't procure them for the sake of trafficking them to others. Phew.

He procured his underage harem all for himself. Maybe he let them out and they had to be moved from one location to another, almost like they were being trafficked in secret to a client.

But it's not really trafficking, it's borrowing, and Kash might empathisis in defense of Epstein, for some reason, that he was there too. You know, to emphasize he wasn't procuring them for someone else. He was there, made sure they were "trafficked" back "home" when really it's just a dark van and private jet. It's not trafficking if it's under 24 hours I guess and you go back after a quick client visit.

Kash knows is not like the way the word is associated with his base where it conjures images of cartels smuggling women wearing bags on their head away from strife in dark trucks and tunnels to steal our jobs. Kash knows THAT is real trafficking Epstein did not participate in, if that is how Kash feels that question is being asked.

He is playing to the cameras knowing Trump is watching and sure as hell acts like it in a way that used to be a problem. Youd think Kash views the idea they were moved perhaps wearing mascarade masks and not potato sacks makes it less "trafficky" and them staying with Epstein means they weren't "procured for others".

Overall, it's what they don't say, how they act defensively and dismissive to the severity of this, and that up until now they haven't been at all truthful, that leads me to believe Trump is guilty as sin and Kash knows it.

But no one wants to be the doctor that gets shot telling the mafia boss it's terminal this time...
 
Surrealistik said:
Blatant, stone cold bullshit.
Click to expand...
>99.9% of all so-called "sex crimes" are either totally fake bullshit or stuff that shouldn't be criminalized(too high ages of consent, stuff unrelated to actual sex acts but stupidly categorized as such and so on)

Propaganda and manipulation are super huge in this area, the savage zealots(often feminists, but also conservatives and other idiots) have been inventing all sorts terms and concepts with the sole purpose of manipulating, brainwashing and deceiving people - all this happens at different levels from very strong ideological indoctrination targeting individual to numerous deceptions targeting the general public, often in the press/media. Same zealots are also very opposed to punishing unproven allegations or even clear false allegations. It would ruin their world.

In the Epstein case it's not even clear what the allegations are. Illiterate evil morons with often through around the term "pedophile" which means sexual acts with PRE-pubescents. Others will say that some teenage girls joined so parties or events, with no mention of sexual acts. Others say it's some prostitution ring.
Zero evidence in all cases. Time has come for humanity to severely punish unproven allegations of so called "sex crimes" (an perhaps any crime)

cpwill said:
The girls themselves have said they were.

That strikes me as "evidence".
Click to expand...
Unproven allegations are "evidence" to you? Too bad, I hope someone will find some girls to make some allegations about you raping them.

RaleBulgarian said:
Far right, no credibility propaganda mill, The Washington Times, is dutifully presenting MAGAt lies, as usual.
Click to expand...
They need no credibility. The burden of proof is not on them. Those that make the allegations have to come with the verifiable evidence to be examined rigorously. MAGA are evil for many other things but here it's not the case.
Making allegations of crime without evidence should be punished severely. So should be attempts to present allegations as evidence or to shift the burden of proof.
 
Nilhus said:
>99.9% of all so-called "sex crimes" are either totally fake bullshit or stuff that shouldn't be criminalized(too high ages of consent, stuff unrelated to actual sex acts but stupidly categorized as such and so on)

Propaganda and manipulation are super huge in this area, the savage zealots(often feminists, but also conservatives and other idiots) have been inventing all sorts terms and concepts with the sole purpose of manipulating, brainwashing and deceiving people - all this happens at different levels from very strong ideological indoctrination targeting individual to numerous deceptions targeting the general public, often in the press/media. Same zealots are also very opposed to punishing unproven allegations or even clear false allegations. It would ruin their world.

In the Epstein case it's not even clear what the allegations are. Illiterate evil morons with often through around the term "pedophile" which means sexual acts with PRE-pubescents. Others will say that some teenage girls joined so parties or events, with no mention of sexual acts. Others say it's some prostitution ring.
Zero evidence in all cases. Time has come for humanity to severely punish unproven allegations of so called "sex crimes" (an perhaps any crime)


Unproven allegations are "evidence" to you? Too bad, I hope someone will find some girls to make some allegations about you raping them.


They need no credibility. The burden of proof is not on them. Those that make the allegations have to come with the verifiable evidence to be examined rigorously. MAGA are evil for many other things but here it's not the case.
Making allegations of crime without evidence should be punished severely. So should be attempts to present allegations as evidence or to shift the burden of proof.
Click to expand...

Ladies, I don't know, but he might be single. Move quick before he gets snapped up by a model, or movie star, or Charlie Kirk fan. The gentleman is well-informed, well-spoken, may type with more than two fingers and even have opposable thumbs. Don't miss your chance!
 
Kash Patel says. **** him, **** Trump.

Oh BTW MAGA guys, you know that gets Clinton off the hook. Cool with that?

The Left was always cool with Clinton getting caught in the dragnet if it got Trump. Ironic the Right are just as happy with the Clintons being exonerated just as long as Trump is too, huh?
 
Surrealistik said:
www.washingtontimes.com

FBI has no evidence Epstein trafficked girls to others

The FBI’s truncated investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein found no evidence that he trafficked women or girls to other people, and only showed he procured them for himself, bureau Director Kash Patel told Congress on Tuesday.
www.washingtontimes.com www.washingtontimes.com

Paywall bypass: https://archive.ph/C25sj



Blatant, stone cold bullshit.

The best case scenario is Kash is being overtly particular about the wording in asserting it means that Epstein did not procure minors to put into the ongoing possession of other people... which is of course saying much of nothing and needs not be explicated unless the idea was to *imply* that Epstein did not provide or otherwise make available underage girls to others for sexual exploitation without actually saying so; something that is obviously and completely ludicrous. Even this is blatantly very suspicious and guilty behaviour on Kash's part and screams govt coverup.
Click to expand...
Kash Patel had a 4-hour temper tantrum in the senate yesterday. He looked like a petulant little child who just lost their toys. It was a disgusting representation of the world's premier LE agency.

When republican senators are complaining about unsatisfactory answers, you know the agency is in trouble. Patel is not interested in protecting and promoting the FBI, he's only interested in pleasing and protecting Trump, his Jesus.

He is a disgrace.
 
The AntiDonald said:
Kash Patel had a 4-hour temper tantrum in the senate yesterday. He looked like a petulant little child who just lost their toys. It was a disgusting representation of the world's premier LE agency.

When republican senators are complaining about unsatisfactory answers, you know the agency is in trouble. Patel is not interested in protecting and promoting the FBI, he's only interested in pleasing and protecting Trump, his Jesus.

He is a disgrace.
Click to expand...
Can you blame him? Patel got the job because of unflinching loyalty to Trump. If he wavers, he's fired. Same with Hegseth, Bondi, Gabbard, and the rest of the Keystone Kabinet. Except maybe for RFKrazy. I don't know WTF that's about.
 
• Epstein pleaded guilty in 2008 to soliciting sex from a minor, and was widely known to have operated a trafficking ring involving dozens of underage girls.
• Multiple victims have testified that Epstein trafficked them to powerful associates, including in civil suits and media interviews.
• Flight logs, witness statements, and Ghislaine Maxwell’s conviction all point to a network, not a solo operation.
This could be due to:
• Redacted or sealed documents
• Political pressure or institutional inertia
• Legal limitations from past plea deals and settlements
It might also be due to what Trump has turned our FBI into. There may not be any truthful people left in it or as least none with the courage to speak out anymore. All Patel's testimony does is put on display the corruption Trump has instilled in the FPI.
What the FBI Previously Acknowledged
Before Kash Patel’s appointment as FBI Director, the Bureau:
• Openly acknowledged Epstein’s trafficking network, not just his personal abuse.
• Cooperated with investigations that led to Ghislaine Maxwell’s conviction for trafficking minors to Epstein and others.
• Received and archived civil suits, victim statements, and flight logs implicating numerous high-profile individuals in Epstein’s orbit.
What Changed Under Patel
• Patel now claims there’s “no credible information” in FBI files showing Epstein trafficked girls to others.
• He blames the limited scope of the original investigation and restrictive search warrants from 2006–2007.
• Critics, including legal analysts and senators, have called his testimony implausible and misleading, especially given Maxwell’s conviction and the volume of civil litigation.
This isn’t just a factual contradiction—it’s a political reframing. Patel’s testimony aligns with a broader effort to:
• Deflect scrutiny from Epstein’s powerful associates.
• Shift blame to past prosecutors like Alexander Acosta.
• Recast the FBI’s role as limited by legal technicalities, rather than institutional failure or political shielding.
We now live in a world in which Trump and his cronies are protected from the consequences for any wrong doing while innocent people will be falsely accused, convicted and punished for both Trump's pleasure and take over of our country.
 
Surrealistik said:
www.washingtontimes.com

FBI has no evidence Epstein trafficked girls to others

The FBI’s truncated investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein found no evidence that he trafficked women or girls to other people, and only showed he procured them for himself, bureau Director Kash Patel told Congress on Tuesday.
www.washingtontimes.com www.washingtontimes.com

Paywall bypass: https://archive.ph/C25sj



Blatant, stone cold bullshit.

The best case scenario is Kash is being overtly particular about the wording in asserting it means that Epstein did not procure minors to put into the ongoing possession of other people... which is of course saying much of nothing and needs not be explicated unless the idea was to *imply* that Epstein did not provide or otherwise make available underage girls to others for sexual exploitation without actually saying so; something that is obviously and completely ludicrous. Even this is blatantly very suspicious and guilty behaviour on Kash's part and screams govt coverup.
Click to expand...
Trump's personal FBI. I wouldn't expect anything less, frankly.
 
snakestretcher said:
Trump's personal FBI. I wouldn't expect anything less, frankly.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure how long the decent Americans can continue to put up with this third world authoritarian bullshit. Something has to give.

I pray it does or America is finished as we know it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom