- Joined
- Jan 28, 2013
- Messages
- 94,823
- Reaction score
- 28,342
- Location
- Williamsburg, Virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
On the grounds that they defrauded their shareholders with false information. It's one thing to have an opinion, it's another to use false information to sell that opinion to shareholders.
This must be the most retarded excuse ever made. Makes the deniers look like geniuses.
It should be, that's the point.
And they aren't doing research now, save the kind that yields the results they want, so who cares...
All Exxon climate research was published in scientific journals and Exxon participated in multiple IPCC reviews and reports.
[h=1]The “Exxon Climate Papers” show what Exxon and climate science knew and shared[/h]If they withheld or suppressed climate research from the public or shareholders, it is not apparent in these documents. Guest essay by Andy May New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman has accused ExxonMobil of lying to the public and investors about the risks of climate change according to the NY Times and has launched…
Well compared to the idiocy you posted it sure is.I am sure you feel your post is pure genius.
You could overcome it with a bit of education.Ignorance is bliss for far too many.
If Exxon has already shared their research with the public....then why are they in court trying to prevent the release of their research on global warming?
Exxon doesn't seem to be denying they did the research...only that they don't want to share it with the public because of their constitutional rights. But there is no constitutional protection for lying, misleading or defrauding their shareholders.
State the elements of "defrauding shareholders," and show how anything they did regarding this research fulfills them.
If Exxon has already shared their research with the public....then why are they in court trying to prevent the release of their research on global warming?
Exxon doesn't seem to be denying they did the research...only that they don't want to share it with the public because of their constitutional rights. But there is no constitutional protection for lying, misleading or defrauding their shareholders.
I doubt it's meritless or Exxon wouldn't be trying so hard to keep the research secret.
Well compared to the idiocy you posted it sure is.
You could overcome it with a bit of education.
If Exxon has already shared their research with the public....then why are they in court trying to prevent the release of their research on global warming?
Exxon doesn't seem to be denying they did the research...only that they don't want to share it with the public because of their constitutional rights. But there is no constitutional protection for lying, misleading or defrauding their shareholders.
Why is the Mass AG refusing to turn over her records on the Exxon investigation? Is she afraid of what they might reveal?
Healey refuses to turn over climate change records
She's also got trouble with a federal judge.
[h=1]Federal Court Delivers Stunning Blow to Mass. AG and #ExxonKnew Campaign[/h]By Katie Brown. (h/t to Matt Dempsey) In yet another stunning blow to the #ExxonKnew campaign, a federal judge today issued a discovery order against Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey to determine whether “bias or prejudgment” influenced her decision to initiate a “bad faith” investigation into ExxonMobil, just days after she appeared before news cameras with…
October 13, 2016 in Climate News.
It begs the question: is Healey refusing to turn over the records, because she's involved in anbunconstitutional (illegal) investigation?
This will be killed 20 Jan.
Sadly.
Elections have consequences ...
She's also got trouble with a federal judge.
[h=1]Federal Court Delivers Stunning Blow to Mass. AG and #ExxonKnew Campaign[/h]By Katie Brown. (h/t to Matt Dempsey) In yet another stunning blow to the #ExxonKnew campaign, a federal judge today issued a discovery order against Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey to determine whether “bias or prejudgment” influenced her decision to initiate a “bad faith” investigation into ExxonMobil, just days after she appeared before news cameras with…
October 13, 2016 in Climate News.
Why is the Mass AG refusing to turn over her records on the Exxon investigation? Is she afraid of what they might reveal?
Healey refuses to turn over climate change records
It begs the question: is Healey refusing to turn over the records, because she's involved in anbunconstitutional (illegal) investigation?
It's more likely that congress is engaging in McCarthyesque inquisitions.
Please see #162.
It's more likely that congress is engaging in McCarthyesque inquisitions.
Wow...a republican congressman is abusing his power to interfere with a States investigation into corporate wrongdoing....is stunning...but not surprising. The House of Representatives is getting more like a nazi inquisition with each passing day.
McCarthyism is alive and well in the House of Representatives.
Why is the Mass AG refusing to turn over her records on the Exxon investigation? Is she afraid of what they might reveal?
Healey refuses to turn over climate change records
Why is congress for the time in US history interfering in State investigation on fraud?
How is he abusing he power? Can you explain that?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?