Because having classified information on her unclassified computer or server would be a crime. So she would not want to admit to a crime.
Classified emails could not...physically could not...be sent to her personal server. They'd have to be copied to disk or flash drive and put on the unclass computer that way (illegally). Or the information itself could be cut and pasted into the emails or paraphrased etc.
She didn't know it was there, it was sent to her without markings.
Because if she was receiving classified information over unclassified networks then
A) she is an incompetent
B) she has put US national security at risk, and
C) she has broken the law and violated her NDA.
We have networks for decision makers to receive and transmit SECRET and TOP SECRET material. She probably got those briefs and those messages in those formats, but apparently she also though it was okay to have it delivered on her blackberry when convenient. Laws? Psh. Laws are for the little people, I'm Hilllary and I'm Busy.
Her motive was...
Even your source says the emails were unclassified.
Goodbye NBD, you have not given an acceptable answer. Have you figured out yet that its nearly impossible to edit an email without being detected.
How do you get the header information correct?
...... and what, exactly, do you think that proves?
:doh You are literally quoting her quoting EO13526 and claiming that it's her posting garbage.
INR is not a collection agency. It was the analysis section of the OSS that got broken off and handed off to State after WWII. They probably should work better with their embassy staff, agreed, but the collection that goes on out of embassies is either Defense Department (The Defense Attache, which is overt collection) or CIA (which is covert collection).
The agencies that created this intelligence were collection agencies. By the time it got to State Department channels, it was already classified. So, for example, when I was working intel for the Marines, I would get DAT reporting, I would get CIA reporting, I would get NSA reporting, I would get NRO reporting, and I would get NGA products, and I would try to fuse all those together into integrated, multi-source intelligence for my boss. All reporting that comes from the CIA is classified at the point of origination, all reporting from the NSA is classified from origination, all reporting from any of these agencies is classified from the point of origination. There is no "it was later classified" for that kind of material.
If it was collateral, it had to stay on SIPR or above. It if was SCI, it had to stay on JWICS. If I put any of that crap onto NIPR much less if I put it only my personal, I would have been toast. Because I'm one of the Little People to whom the rules apply.
The individual who took classified information from another agency, and then repeated that information in an unclassified email, has violated their NDA a couple of laws, as has the individual who receives and then does not report that information; especially if that second party then stores that classified data privately, refuses to turn it over to the government, and transfers it to third parties, none of whom have security clearances.
It is?
Please to explain.
look at a similar email.
And it magically changes before your eyes?
So we have conspiracy here? Hillary doent have the knowledge to accomplish this herself.So you don't know, the tech is above you and you proclaim it not possible.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email_spoofing
So we have conspiracy here? Hillary doent have the knowledge to accomplish this herself.
She didn't know it was there, it was sent to her without markings.
Sorry, last night I said it was not nearly possible.No, I made no comment one way or the other about that. I took issue with your proclamation that it's not possible.
Sorry, last night I said it was not nearly possible.
One, she should't need markings to know some things are classified.
Two, When the information left its respective agencies, it was marked. Someone, somewhere along the way, rewrote it without markings or stripped the markings then cut and paste.
She didn't know it was there, it was sent to her without markings.
Do you realize INR frequently disagees with the other agencies.
How do you get the header information correct?
That is false, they never said such a thing.They already know that it wasn't sent to her without markings. That's why they clearly stated the markings weren't removed by any others in the IC.
That is false, they never said such a thing.
Yes, but that's irrelvant because they cannot declassify another agency's reports. They can't just decide it shouldn't be classified and then ship around their own version.
That's interesting.
Given that the information left the processors with markings on it, are you suggesting that it wasn't removed by those who sent it to Hillary, but by Hillary herself?
Do you realize INR frequently disagees with the other agencies.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?