- Joined
- Sep 16, 2007
- Messages
- 9,796
- Reaction score
- 2,590
- Location
- out yonder
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
So I take it you approve of these fake congressional districts.
This is a great strategy to lock up future congressional districts that don't yet exist. Brilliant strategy if you ask me. 20 years from now, the Democrats can campaign in these yet to be determined districts and talk about how they brought jobs to those areas even before those areas had job problems. Talk about showing your foresight as a political party. Progressives indeed.
This really is hilarious. This thread is completely devoid of any Obama apologists. No way to defend him on this one.
Where is the corruption? I haven't seen anything to suggest the receipts were deliberately labeled incorrectly or that, if the receipts were submitted correct, the data was deliberately inputted incorrectly.
It is a non-issue if you don't care Obama lies. It is a non-issue if you don't care the dems are not being transparent as they promised. It is an issue to those of us that don't want the government controlling us and lying to us.
Hyperbole.
Please show any proof that Obama is lying here. They are obviously attempting to be transparent by listing how every dollar is spent and allow for inaccuracies like this to be found. Not being transparent would mean that such reporting wouldn't be available.
Sir,
I think you're missing the point. The Administration's claims to have saved jobs appears to normal people to be a fantasy based on artificial intellectual constructs. But then Obama is so incompetent in telling the story of this artificial intellectual constructs that his errors are easily discovered and explained. He's caught in clear incompetence. This is what exposes him to ridicule. For a politician ridicule is the worst thing in the world.
Obama has said repeatedly, that there have been hundreds of thousands of jobs created, or saved by the stealfromus bill. That's an obvious lie.
Obama has said repeatedly, that there have been hundreds of thousands of jobs created, or saved by the stealfromus bill. That's an obvious lie.
Thanks to the transparency provided in the availability of these reports it is shown that the data he used in making those statements are inaccurate.
How is it a lie, when the stimulus is an ongoing operation?Only about 10% of the stimulus money has been spent so far.
I'm sorry, but I still fail to see how this is such a great move on PBO's part...:rofl
PBO apologists beat all I ever seen...:rofl
Basically what you're saying is, "yeah, we know he's dicked up, but we know he's dicked up and that's what matters".
How is it a lie, when the stimulus is an ongoing operation?Only about 10% of the stimulus money has been spent so far.
It's a lie, because PBO is claiming that hundreds of thousands of job have already been saved by the stealfromus money that has already been spent.
PBO's own recovery chief says that those numbers can't be verified, yet PBO has touted them as accurate for several weeks now. Now, either PBO is lieing, or he's just stupid.
Recovery Board Chairman: We Can?t Certify Jobs Data at Recovery.gov - The Note
Obviously you aren't reading my posts. I have stated there is clear incompetency displayed here.
What you are FAILING to do is provide evidence that supports that this mistake was deliberate and malicious and NOT just incompetency.
So, that's your excuse for PBO? Stupidity?
He saw positive numbers and wanted to get them into the public as fast as possible to help boost support, morale, whatever. He made the assumption the reporting process was accurate and took the chance in presenting numbers not 100% verified. It happens all the time in business. It's a gamble and in this scenario it backfired on him.
It definitely was a stupid move on his part. He should have waited and had the numbers double checked before he opened his mouth. But that's the gamble he choose to take.
I've seen this same type of optimism kill people's careers. Obama seems to be going that way too.
Hyperbole.
Please show any proof that Obama is lying here. They are obviously attempting to be transparent by listing how every dollar is spent and allow for inaccuracies like this to be found. Not being transparent would mean that such reporting wouldn't be available.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?