Exclusive: Google Insider Turns Over 950 Pages Of Docs And Laptop To DOJ

[zimmer]

He told this reporter on his recent trip to Washington D.C. that the documents he turned over to the Justice Department will provide proof that Google has been manipulating the algorithms and the evidence of how it was done, the insider said.

Google CEO Sundar Pichai told the House Judiciary Committee in December, 2018, that the search engine was not biased against conservatives. Pichai explained what algorithm’s are said Google’s algorithm was not offensive to conservatives because its artificial intelligence does not operate in that manner. He told lawmakers, “things like relevance, freshness, popularity, how other people are using it” are what drives the search results. Pichai said even if his programmers were anti-Republican, the process is so intricate that the artificial intelligence could not be manipulated and it was to complicated to train the algorithm to fit their bias.

when they see what Google has actually written with the documents, this will actually be taught in universities of what totalitarian states can do with this type of capability.”

Exclusive: Google Insider Turns Over 950 Pages Of Docs And Laptop To DOJ - Sara A. Carter

Lied to Congress.

Time for him to spend some time behind bars.

 

[joko104]

If true, a conspiracy theory that threatens the existence of this country as a democratic republican - and the existence of a free press - just became a fact. The richest man on earth is trying to totally take over our elections and political system - and in doing so trying to take over the government itself. Since this includes then opposition to tariffs to the benefit of China and other economic and military adversaries - all also for personal and corporate financial profit in doing so, is treason punishable by death.

 

[Moot]

The former Google insider, who has already spoken in to the nonprofit organization Project Veritas, met with SaraACarter.com on several occasions last week. He was interviewed in silhouette, to conceal his identity, in group’s latest film, which they say exposes bias inside the social media platform.

Several weeks prior, the insider mailed a laptop to the DOJ containing the same information delivered on Friday, they said. The former insider is choosing to remain anonymous until Project Verita’s James O’Keefe reveals his identity tomorrow (Wednesday).

Anything associated with James O'Keefe and Project Veritas is highly suspect and belongs in the conspiracy forum...not the breaking news forum. The article and website aren't even a credible news source.

 

[Moot]

Hannity defiant after Fox News execs ask him to stop calling Sara Carter ‘investigative reporter’

Well, there you go, the author isn't even a real investigative reporter. When FoxNews says her work doesn't meet FoxNews guidelines you know she's gotta be a fake.

 

[trouble13]

If true, a conspiracy theory that threatens the existence of this country as a democratic republican - and the existence of a free press - just became a fact. The richest man on earth is trying to totally take over our elections and political system - and in doing so trying to take over the government itself. Since this includes then opposition to tariffs to the benefit of China and other economic and military adversaries - all also for personal and corporate financial profit in doing so, is treason punishable by death.

I will believe that when i see it

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

[zimmer]

Anything associated with James O'Keefe and Project Veritas is highly suspect and belongs in the conspiracy forum...not the breaking news forum. The article and website aren't even a credible news source.

Wrong on so many counts. It largely illustrates how Leftists remain Leftists. A closed mind is a terrible thing to have.

You probably failed to note the computer and documents were sent to the Department of Justice. In fact... you did. The closed mind strikes again.

Score on for ignorance.

O’Keefe has exposed a lot of criminal, corrupt Leftists. Of course Democrats don’t like him.

 

[zimmer]

Hannity defiant after Fox News execs ask him to stop calling Sara Carter ‘investigative reporter’

Well, there you go, the author isn't even a real investigative reporter. When FoxNews says her work doesn't meet FoxNews guidelines you know she's gotta be a fake.

ROTFLOL... she along with John Solomon kept breaking news about Obama Administration corruption related to the Fake Russian Collusion story, and peeled away the true story... that the Obama Administration was spying on Trump.

Not one of the Goebbels Media Networks did so. No, no, no... they pimped the lie about Russian Collusion for 2-years.

 

[Jay59]

Anything associated with James O'Keefe and Project Veritas is highly suspect and belongs in the conspiracy forum...not the breaking news forum. The article and website aren't even a credible news source.

You mean on par with CNN?

Facts are stubborn. It does not matter who has them. They stay facts.

 

[Moot]

You mean on par with CNN?

Facts are stubborn. It does not matter who has them. They stay facts.

The only facts in this story is that James O'Keefe is con man and Sara Carter is a fake investigative journalist.

 

[Jay59]

The only facts in this story is that James O'Keefe is con man and Sara Carter is a fake investigative journalist.

I already said on par with CNN.

 

[Moot]

I already said on par with CNN.

Ho hum.

 

[Moot]

Wrong on so many counts. It largely illustrates how Leftists remain Leftists. A closed mind is a terrible thing to have.

You probably failed to note the computer and documents were sent to the Department of Justice. In fact... you did. The closed mind strikes again.

Score on for ignorance.

O’Keefe has exposed a lot of criminal, corrupt Leftists. Of course Democrats don’t like him.

Yes, it says documents were sent to the DoJ....back in December 2018. So who is this secret source, zimmer? Wasn't his name supposed to be revealed yesterday?


O'Keefe is a felon and has only managed to expose himself as a fraud. Democrats are smart to not trust frauds.

 

[Moot]

ROTFLOL... she along with John Solomon kept breaking news about Obama Administration corruption related to the Fake Russian Collusion story, and peeled away the true story... that the Obama Administration was spying on Trump.

Not one of the Goebbels Media Networks did so. No, no, no... they pimped the lie about Russian Collusion for 2-years.

I don't think the Russian Collusion is a lie...especially in light of the real news about Moscow Mitch lifting sanctions on a Kremlin oligarch that colluded with Manafort during the 2016 election.

New questions about '''Moscow Mitch''' and Russian company


If the left is still talking about Russian collusion it's probably because it's still going on.

But that Obama spying on Trump thingy....yeah, that was debunked ages ago.

 

[Thoreau72]

If true, a conspiracy theory that threatens the existence of this country as a democratic republican - and the existence of a free press - just became a fact. The richest man on earth is trying to totally take over our elections and political system - and in doing so trying to take over the government itself. Since this includes then opposition to tariffs to the benefit of China and other economic and military adversaries - all also for personal and corporate financial profit in doing so, is treason punishable by death.

If you think this is bad, and it is, you should watch the Netflix piece about Cambridge Analytica, "The Great Hack".

 

[Notofimport]

Anything associated with James O'Keefe and Project Veritas is highly suspect and belongs in the conspiracy forum...not the breaking news forum. The article and website aren't even a credible news source.

They have been vindicated multiple times from these fake accusations people toss up when they cannot address the evidence presented.

This was not project veritas claims, this was a Google engineer who presented documents.

Or were you waiting for Google to publish and openly admit that they are trying to program people to be more susceptible to advertisements?

 

[Notofimport]

I don't think the Russian Collusion is a lie...especially in light of the real news about Moscow Mitch lifting sanctions on a Kremlin oligarch that colluded with Manafort during the 2016 election.

New questions about '''Moscow Mitch''' and Russian company


If the left is still talking about Russian collusion it's probably because it's still going on.

But that Obama spying on Trump thingy....yeah, that was debunked ages ago.

Interesting fact is that those most concerned about foreign influence on election processes are the same people that fight to prevent any ability to prevent voter fraud of any kind.

 

[RAMOSS]

I already said on par with CNN.

Nah.. far far worse.

 

[Jay59]

Nah.. far far worse.

Worse than CNN. That is bad, though Moot doesn't think so

Ho hum.

Of course Moot thinks Manafort colluded with Russians, during the campaign no less. Not a strong grasp on facts.

 

[RAMOSS]

Worse than CNN. That is bad, though Moot doesn't think so

when it comes to failing fact checks, cnn is about 3 on a scale from 1 to 10,and sara carter is 9

 

[Jay59]

when it comes to failing fact checks, cnn is about 3 on a scale from 1 to 10,and sara carter is 9

I didn't know who Sara Carter was until I looked, so no specific comment. About CNN, you have a point. There fact checking merely very sloppy. Their problem is leaving half the story. NYT will run the other half on page #6, but it's usually in there. CNN will run a round table with nine of the same viewpoint.

 

[RAMOSS]

I didn't know who Sara Carter was until I looked, so no specific comment. About CNN, you have a point. There fact checking merely very sloppy. Their problem is leaving half the story. NYT will run the other half on page #6, but it's usually in there. CNN will run a round table with nine of the same viewpoint.

Their problem is that they failed to fact check a few times to 'get the scope', and had to retract.

 

[Tanngrisnir]

Wrong on so many counts. It largely illustrates how Leftists remain Leftists. A closed mind is a terrible thing to have.

You probably failed to note the computer and documents were sent to the Department of Justice. In fact... you did. The closed mind strikes again.

Score on for ignorance.

O’Keefe has exposed a lot of criminal, corrupt Leftists. Of course Democrats don’t like him.

LOLOL! Ah, sweet, delusional magical thinking.

O'Keefe himself IS a criminal. I can see why you'd love him.

 

[Jay59]

Their problem is that they failed to fact check a few times to 'get the scope', and had to retract.

Their problem is that the new management is so focused on getting rid of Trump that they don't care about facts until someone calls them on it. There was a time when CNN was up there with NYT and WaPo as the standard of integrity. Those two have fallen off the podium but CNN cratered. In a way it's good, because Washington Times and NY Post are filling the journalism gap.

 

[Notofimport]

Nah.. far far worse.

Worse than CNN. That is bad, though Moot doesn't think so


Of course Moot thinks Manafort colluded with Russians, during the campaign no less. Not a strong grasp on facts.

when it comes to failing fact checks, cnn is about 3 on a scale from 1 to 10,and sara carter is 9

I didn't know who Sara Carter was until I looked, so no specific comment. About CNN, you have a point. There fact checking merely very sloppy. Their problem is leaving half the story. NYT will run the other half on page #6, but it's usually in there. CNN will run a round table with nine of the same viewpoint.

Their problem is that they failed to fact check a few times to 'get the scope', and had to retract.

LOLOL! Ah, sweet, delusional magical thinking.

O'Keefe himself IS a criminal. I can see why you'd love him.

This sequence is exactly why we address the presented facts instead of fallaciously attacking.... not even the source, but attacking the messenger as a way to avoid discussing the source or the facts presented.

 

[Tanngrisnir]

This sequence is exactly why we address the presented facts instead of fallaciously attacking.... not even the source, but attacking the messenger as a way to avoid discussing the source or the facts presented.

There is no credible evidence, whatsoever, that anything presented is indeed factual.