• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Evidence that the climate scam is collapsing

A legitimate challenge would require large groups of scientifically trained researchers in order to be credible. Who, and where, are they? Please name for us some groups of scientists, and their organizations, that are mounting this challenge.
No, in science, it only takes one person to be right!
Remember,
"Why one hundred? If I were wrong, one would have been enough".
 
A legitimate challenge would require large groups of scientifically trained researchers in order to be credible. Who, and where, are they? Please name for us some groups of scientists, and their organizations, that are mounting this challenge.
Oh just stop. Anytime we bring in material from other credible scientists, you guys dismiss them.

You deny science. You find anything that disagrees whith other valid works and demy what you disagree with.

You guys are the true deniers. You say the science is settleled and deny any science you do not like.
 
Oh just stop. Anytime we bring in material from other credible scientists, you guys dismiss them.
I didn't dismiss anyone. Perhaps you are thinking of someone else?
Back to the topic - what groups are mounting a challenge to the carbon researchers?
 
I didn't dismiss anyone. Perhaps you are thinking of someone else?
Back to the topic - what groups are mounting a challenge to the carbon researchers?
There are already two studies or more that claim the sensitivity of CO2 is already 0.5 degrees. I am almost certain you have dismissed one of them in the past. I don't know if you have seen both.
 
There are already two studies or more that claim the sensitivity of CO2 is already 0.5 degrees. I am almost certain you have dismissed one of them in the past. I don't know if you have seen both.
Back to the topic - what scientific groups are mounting a challenge to the carbon researchers?
 
Back to the topic - what scientific groups are mounting a challenge to the carbon researchers?
There is the CO2 coalition, but for the most part it would be induvial scientist.
Any researched who takes the time to actually look at the data would realize the case for CO2
caused warming is weak at best.
For some reason I keep thinking of the Galileo quote,
"In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual."
The scientific method only has value as long as scientist adhere to the methods!
The scientific method says that we follow the data, even if it leads away from a political agenda.
On the topic of this thread, we are starting to see more scientist question the catastrophic conclusions of the IPCC.
 
Back
Top Bottom