- Joined
- Jun 16, 2019
- Messages
- 56,151
- Reaction score
- 64,717
- Location
- Tucson
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Or we really do hate You People.It's become axiomatic with the political left. They see hatred as a virtue and, therefore, see the need signal their "virtue" to all the world. These so called "protests" are little more than a signal to others of their flock to "Look at me! I'm so virtuous! If you don't hate as openly as I do then you're doing it wrong!"
Ah . . . training. Big difference, amigo. (But thank you for your service.)You would have at Fort Benning. I mean, there aren't a lot of drill sergeants at Fort Bliss.
And air national guard? I suppose that tracks. I wouldn't expect national guard or reservists to march in a parade.
Not because they're not soldiers, they are...But because the last time they practiced D&C was in basic.
I doubt it. If that's the impression you got from the parade, that's the impression you got.I’ve seen JROTC kids in parades look more invested
Lee Greenwood, who's song doesn't believe that women died for this country too.
View attachment 67574884
Two men from New Jersey hold a flag reading “Trump for King” before the parade. (Pete Kiehart/For The Washington Post)
Why did a civilian salute the military? Didn't anyone tell Cadet Bonespurs not to do that?
Is It Disrespectful to Salute if You're Not in the Military?
Explore the etiquette of the military salute for civilians, understand the respectful alternatives to honor service members, and navigate the cultural sensitivities of military traditions.ucmj.us
where did he get that sport jacket? Is he selling used cars on the side?
Hey man he salutes foreign military officers so why wouldn't he do the same with Americans?Why did a civilian salute the military? Didn't anyone tell Cadet Bonespurs not to do that?
Is It Disrespectful to Salute if You're Not in the Military?
Explore the etiquette of the military salute for civilians, understand the respectful alternatives to honor service members, and navigate the cultural sensitivities of military traditions.ucmj.us
You just used up your month's supply of hyperbole. It's best not to blow your load all at once.Yes. Anything that celebrates exceptionalism in this nation is sad because we all must learn to hate America as much as the political left does or else they will roll out more protests to "teach" us how to hate properly.
My father-in-law (Vietnam, First Gulf War, Iraq/Afghanistan) and youngest sister-in-law (Iraq and Afghanistan, now reserves), all Army, all Democrats, all served. My little cousin (two tours Afghanistan, victim of PTSD, suicide) also Democrat, Army and served. All veterans. All fought for this nation. So, you can take your "liberals hate America" BS and shove it up your ass.Look, if that's the best reason you have to hate America and hate the Army and hate Trump then more power to you.
No.It was a neat parade.
You and your family are entitled to your opinion. It was a good parade and a real celebration.No.
It wasn't.
It was pathetic. It was a disgrace. My in-laws who are veterans were not impressed. I saw some of the footage...this was weak sauce and not a good representation of the Army. I am very disappointed: so many family and in-laws that were in the armed forces (mostly Army, some Navy) who were disappointed as well.
I remember the end of the first Gulf War in DC with the parade and awesome fireworks to celebrate the end of the war and the coming home of our troops (National Victory Celebration). So proud, so happy.
For many years afterwards, I would go to the Spirit of America shows in DC with family or in-laws. Those were awesome shows that showcased the US Army Band, the Old Guard, various honor units (with caissons) drills and various vehicles like the Strykers. But always as an important part of the show: swearing in volunteers into the Army in front of the crowd.
Those were awesome displays and great reasons to be proud, not just of the Army, but the armed forces in all. This parade was weak, ill-attended and geared for the vanity of one man...not even a real celebration of the Army.
Not because they're not soldiers, they are...But because the last time they practiced D&C was in basic.
No.
It wasn't.
It was pathetic. It was a disgrace. My in-laws who are veterans were not impressed. I saw some of the footage...this was weak sauce and not a good representation of the Army. I am very disappointed: so many family and in-laws that were in the armed forces (mostly Army, some Navy) who were disappointed as well.
I remember the end of the first Gulf War in DC with the parade and awesome fireworks to celebrate the end of the war and the coming home of our troops (National Victory Celebration). So proud, so happy.
For many years afterwards, I would go to the Spirit of America shows in DC with family or in-laws. Those were awesome shows that showcased the US Army Band, the Old Guard, various honor units (with caissons) drills and various vehicles like the Strykers. But always as an important part of the show: swearing in volunteers into the Army in front of the crowd.
Those were awesome displays and great reasons to be proud, not just of the Army, but the armed forces in all. This parade was weak, ill-attended and geared for the vanity of one man...not even a real celebration of the Army.
Or maybe that’s just the state of the Army these days.Indeed, the troops on foot were loose and sloppy. Their posture was relaxed rather than alert and focused. It's apparent to me the grunts were going through the motions for the Generalissimo. They were not taking it seriously. The West Point contingent of the cadets looked like they were strolling along together rather than marching.
It is unmistakable that Trump recognized right away this was not his Bastille Day grand military parade extravaganza. Nowhere near close in fact. For one thing, the troops marched in their work camos rather than wearing their formal dress or regular wear uniforms.
While only several units looked good, it's just obvious the Army made a stinker of it. The marchers were not self disciplined -- or well disciplined -- and not in a good order which says the Army communicated to 'em it did not take the parade seriously either. Slacking off seems to have been the order of the day.
When I was in The Old Guard in the Military District of Washington DC I marched in countless parades and later participated in judging some parades and this one was piss poor stuff. Virtually every unit of troops in this parade knows how to march well or at least respectably and this wasn't it -- by design.
These guys train to be soldiers . They don't train to be in parades. Marching in lockstep is not a big part of their training. Quite frankly . I 'd rather have well trained soldiers than well trained marchers.Or maybe that’s just the state of the Army these days.
It’s more plausible than a CT that they were ordered to be sloppy.These guys train to be soldiers . They don't train to be in parades. Marching in lockstep is not a big part of their training. Quite frankly . I 'd rather have well trained soldiers than well trained marchers.
You have both so you can stop pacing the floor nights.These guys train to be soldiers . They don't train to be in parades. Marching in lockstep is not a big part of their training. Quite frankly . I 'd rather have well trained soldiers than well trained marchers.
They were nor ordered to be sloppy that is beyond ridiculous.It’s more plausible than a CT that they were ordered to be sloppy.
Not sure what about my post set you off given. your first paragraph agrees with my post. These are trained soldiers. Marching is not one of their specialties. I said nothing of other members of the armed services. Hope the rest of your day is betterYou have both so you can stop pacing the floor nights.The parade represented all of the ten Army Divisions that are combat certified and ready to be deployed. As we saw, marching is not one of their specialties.
Well trained marchers in Washington DC are also well trained Soldiers, Marines -- Sailors and Coast Guard in the Sea Services -- Airmen, Space Force Guardians. They are both rather than one or the other. This is while you presume wrongly it is one dimensional for the Honor Guard units across the services in Washington DC. Your post popping off is wrong because you are uninformed and lazy about researching it.
There is no military specialty of ceremonial guard in the armed forces of the USA. Each guard has a regular Military Occupation Specialty or Rating in the particular service. A number of ceremonial guard members have had combat experience in their particular service.
You have both so you can stop pacing the floor nights.The parade represented all of the ten Army Divisions that are combat certified and ready to be deployed. As we saw, marching is not one of their specialties.
Well trained marchers in Washington DC are also well trained Soldiers, Marines -- Sailors and Coast Guard in the Sea Services -- Airmen, Space Force Guardians. They are both rather than one or the other. This is while you presume wrongly it is one dimensional for the Honor Guard units across the services in Washington DC. Your post popping off is wrong because you are uninformed and lazy about researching it.
There is no military specialty of ceremonial guard in the armed forces of the USA. Each guard has a regular Military Occupation Specialty or Rating in the particular service. A number of ceremonial guard members have had combat experience in their particular service.
Ceremonial units in Washington DC march during the summer -- and train to fight and win during the winter when the marching and parade season is slow. Each of the services guards of honor train for and conduct honors military funerals year round at Arlington National Cemetery.
Ceremonial units in Washington DC march during the summer -- and train to fight and win during the winter when the marching and parade season is slow. Each of the services guards of honor train for and conduct honors military funerals year round at Arlington National Cemetery.
It is not.Or maybe that’s just the state of the Army these days.
I see your backup lights are better than your headlights.Not sure what about my post set you off given. your first paragraph agrees with my post. These are trained soldiers. Marching is not one of their specialties. I said nothing of other members of the armed services. Hope the rest of your day is better
My post, including the "rather have" was limited to these specific soldiers and what I consider to be unfair criticism of them. No backing up on my part and no "either or". I have been consistently supportive of them and pushed back on criticism of the way they marched. Be offended if you wish....but it's misplaced.I see your backup lights are better than your headlights.
I enjoyed correcting your post because I was able to make positive points about every member of the armed forces. I didn't use "rather have" in my post which is what your post did.
There's no need for your post given the US armed forces are trained to close on the enemy and kill 'em. All of the armed forces. The Pentagon has no thought whatsoever to train the armed forces to march well at the expense of their combat readiness and effectiveness. Your post was either or which is wrong.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?