• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Epstein victims deny Trump sexually abused them

Sandy Shanks said:
Did Trump have sex with under age girls?
Click to expand...
We might never know for sure........as far too much is not being disclosed. Some of the victims are collectively making a list of all the men that went through the Epsitein../ Maxwell set up. They are planning on going public wit theselists....as they have no confidence that full disclosure will happen .
It is very intersting that so many are intrigued with this perversion........... and making it a foucs......while Trump is establishing an aurhtoritarain system..... as democracy is fading into the background. That speaks to the state and character of the population.

Even if Trump's name is on the list that the victims make....he will just LIE......threaten them...call them names. and other trashing . He has NEVER taken ownership of his very bad behavior.
 
Desert Storm said:
And so for none of the 1,000 have come forward and accused Trump of any wrongdoing
Click to expand...
And if there are a thousand victims, why are dems only interested in identifying single name? Apparently, to the left, if you werent molested by Trump, your story doesnt matter.
 
Fletch said:
And if there are a thousand victims, why are dems only interested in identifying single name? Apparently, to the left, if you werent molested by Trump, your story doesnt matter.
Click to expand...
To be fair, they want all of the files released with all of the names and all of the perpetrates prosecuted, but the single name people on both sides of the aisle and all over the world are most interested in is the current sitting president of the United States. You don't think that's more interesting than the name of someone people may have never heard of?
 
Between 2020 and 2024, the Democrats had control of the Epstein information for four years. If there is anything that actually proved impropriety on Trump's part, it's hard to imagine that the Democrats wouldn't have used it prior to the 2024 election.
 
Desert Storm said:
And so for none of the 1,000 have come forward and accused Trump of any wrongdoing
Click to expand...
Would it matter if one did?

I mean…it didn’t matter that he’s sexually assaulted women. We already know he’s done that.

So what, exactly, does someone coming forward and naming him accomplish other than planting a gigantic target on their back?
 
BirdinHand said:
Would it matter if one did?

I mean…it didn’t matter that he’s sexually assaulted women. We already know he’s done that.

So what, exactly, does someone coming forward and naming him accomplish other than planting a gigantic target on their back?
Click to expand...
I don't believe Trump sexually assaulted that woman Jean Carroll (or whatever her name was).

But you are free to believe what you want to believe
 
Fletch said:
And if there are a thousand victims, why are dems only interested in identifying single name? Apparently, to the left, if you werent molested by Trump, your story doesnt matter.
Click to expand...
Lol!! So true, Fletch, so true
 
Desert Storm said:
I don't believe Trump sexually assaulted that woman Jean Carroll (or whatever her name was).

But you are free to believe what you want to believe
Click to expand...
My point exactly.

You don’t believe a woman who was found credible by a court, so what reason would any woman have to come forward and name Trump.

MAGAs won’t believe her anyway.

Hell…dozens of women could come forward and wouldn’t change a god damned thing.

The man was right when he said he could shoot someone and his loyal followers wouldn’t care.
 
BirdinHand said:
Would it matter if one did?

I mean…it didn’t matter that he’s sexually assaulted women. We already know he’s done that.

So what, exactly, does someone coming forward and naming him accomplish other than planting a gigantic target on their back?
Click to expand...
This.

No matter how many people accuse Trump, nor what evidence is presented, @Desert Storm is not going to turn on Donald.
 
Desert Storm said:
Of course Lefties will just say Trump paid them off 🙄

Click to expand...

If Trump has nothing to fear, then why doesn't he just release the ****ing files?

Stop blaming "lefties" and answer the question.

Trump knew what Epstein was doing with these girls....that might be what he is trying to hide.
 
The fact remains that even if there's no evidence tRump had sex with underage females, he is withholding what he promised to provide and there must be a reason for that. If it's to protect powerful perps, he is aiding and abetting them. They need to be put on trial and if found guilty, suffer the consequences.
 
Desert Storm said:
Of course Lefties will just say Trump paid them off 🙄
Click to expand...
"There exist some underage girls who Donald Trump did not rape." Wow! What an incredibly moral man. Of the 4 billion women in the world, there are at least a few who Donald Trump did not grab by the ***** when they were children.

When Trump finally shuffles off this mortal coil, Pope Leo should canonize him for this incredible act of chastity. 🏆
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom