- Joined
- Jan 31, 2010
- Messages
- 31,645
- Reaction score
- 7,598
- Location
- Canada, Costa Rica
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Nail meet head....Exactly right American, but they won't stop there, Progressives are never satisfied with leaving their opponent standing....They want him either dead, or out of office at the least.
As exists in many high power, high profile positions, sometimes you have people around you, trying to make a name for themselves, in doing things they think you'll appreciate, even if you knew nothing about it...IMHO, you libs have a better argument with the "culture" surrounding Christie then you do trying to "frog march" him for a press moment...But it really goes to show you how vindictive liberals are when people don't agree with them lock step.
Yes, he led...Wish we could say the same for Obama.
No, I am saying that the disgruntled employee is not someone I would call objective, and honest after they got fired. Talk about 'having it both ways', these two were fired for possible criminal acts, and you want Christie so bad that you immediately believe anything they imply without evidence....
Yes, he did, but I am sure that the only narrative that will be accepted by you is that CC is guilty. If not by actual evidence, then by smear, and innuendo.
No, this was a traffic jam...Or, if you will, a Tuesday on the GW. The only reason you display his resume is because you want to somehow infer that by being a republican, he must be guilty....That's bs, but I understand, you have nothing else.
No, it's a soap opera....You want to know what a scandal is....Read up on any of these...
Fast and Furious
IRS
NSA
Benghazi
Unilateral appointment while congress was not in recess
Sidestepping congress on Dream act
Crony capitalism from the Oval office
Take your pick, anyone of those are REAL scandals that are being stonewalled by your President currently, in varying degrees. And the difference is that this corruption is brought to us by progressive liberal demo's in the highest office in the land, not some Governor of a state, that had people causing traffic jams....Give me a break...:roll:
Yeah the rightnuts never made a fat joke ...just ask Michael Moore.:lamo
View attachment 67161405
:lamo:lamo:lamo
Yeah the rightnuts never made a fat joke ...just ask Michael Moore.:lamo
View attachment 67161404
Nail meet head....Exactly right American, but they won't stop there, Progressives are never satisfied with leaving their opponent standing....They want him either dead, or out of office at the least.
Most libs probably had massive orgasms when they read this.
Are you saying that Christie is handicapped because he is retarded?You never mentioned who made the Michael Moore poster but disparaging the handicapped goes right to the top with the Democrats. ]
These personal attacks will continue against anyone who the leftists feel might be a threat to Hillary Clinton, or any Democratic candidate. The real issues are no longer important.
Barack Obama defeated Hillary Clinton despite the MSM initially being in the tank for her. Why are Republicans so weak that they presume that any attack on a Republican is a pro-active defense of Hillary?
Are you saying that Christie is handicapped because he is retarded?
Barack Obama defeated Hillary Clinton despite the MSM initially being in the tank for her. Why are Republicans so weak that they presume that any attack on a Republican is a pro-active defense of Hillary?
They are weak because they lack popular support for their ideas..no scratch that.
They are weak because they have no coherent ideas or an individual who can convince voters otherwise.
Why are you Conservatives angry at Liberals? Liberals didn't close the bridge lanes. Liberals didn't play politics with the Sandy funds. Liberals didn't say stupid things to mayors of NJ. That all happened with CC's people. Why are you not attacking them?
Good article about the long road ahead for Christie, by Jeffrey Toobin.
Conclusion:
"Ultimately, Fishman will probably give immunity to Kelly and Stepien, meaning that they will testify before a grand jury. At that point, they will be called before the legislative committee, because they won’t be able to take the Fifth anymore. By then, it will probably be summer at the earliest.
If there are indictments, they probably will not be issued until fall—and trials, if any, would be held in 2015.
In short (or rather, long), Chris Christie can look forward to many months of investigations. News leaks will abound.
Like most U.S. Attorney operations, Fishman’s investigation has been largely invisible to the public, but the legislators, especially the Democrats, live to embarrass the governor. And this is really the best-case scenario for Christie, one in which the investigators do not find anything that would seriously implicate him.
Events are now firmly out of his control. All Christie wants to do is put this whole matter behind him. It will be increasingly apparent that he has a long road ahead of him."
Bridgegate Will Be a Long Road for Chris Christie : The New Yorker
It also helps to explain about a little known term "act-of-production immunity" - which we will likely be hearing more about as the months drag on.
Maybe this will help...I am going to use your sentiment here:
Why are Liberals so mad at Conservatives? Conservatives didn't use the IRS to target political enemies, Conservatives didn't leave our ambassador, and other brave americans to fend for themselves while under attack, then cover it up, Conservatives didn't say stupid things about a video to further that cover up, this all happened with BHO's people. Why are you not attacking them?
See how that works?
What "ideas" are you referring to?
I see how it works.Maybe this will help...I am going to use your sentiment here:
Why are Liberals so mad at Conservatives? Conservatives didn't use the IRS to target political enemies, Conservatives didn't leave our ambassador, and other brave americans to fend for themselves while under attack, then cover it up, Conservatives didn't say stupid things about a video to further that cover up, this all happened with BHO's people. Why are you not attacking them?
See how that works?
When you don't know what those "ideas" were, just say so.I said they had no coherent ideas and no future. The supply side mantra has failed and voters know it. The "job creators" turned out to be a huge bust.
The people chose Barack Obama and the MSM followed. Why can't Republicans do the same? Why can't they nominate a candidate to get the people excited enough to control the MSM? And why do you presume that this is a pre-emptive attack in order to pave the way for Hillary? Sounds like a whole lot of whining. Take personal responsibility for your candidates.Because their history demonstrates this. And yes, the MSM was in the tank for Hillary before they were in the tank for Obama. The fact that the MSM is 'in the tank' for any politician doesn't seem to disturb you at all. This is probably why leftists are called 'low information voters'.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?