earthworm
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2005
- Messages
- 5,728
- Reaction score
- 904
- Location
- Goldsboro,PA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
All the racists should be sent to an internment camp in Antarctica - they would love all the whiteness there..I'd love to be free from their ignorance and fear.
All the racists should be sent to an internment camp in Antarctica - they would love all the whiteness there..I'd love to be free from their ignorance and fear.
Did you say racists or Republicans?
Jim Webb in 2012 because Obama is the sitting president. Obama will continue to be historic by becoming the first incumbent president denied his own party's nomination.
mccain? LMAO!Besides either Obama or McCain running for possible re-election in 2012, which of the above people do think is most likely to run?
You have no grasp of history if you think no president has ever been denied his own party's nomination.
mccain? LMAO!
WAY too old, and losers don't typically rise from the ashes. mccain's own party doesn't like him, and i'm pretty sure he personally would not want to run.What's wrong with McCain? Yeah, he'll be even older. But if he picked a highly experienced very qualified vice presidential candidate and kept detailed information it wouldn't be such a bad deal. You get McCain's experience at the risk of his health. When his health goes down you have a fall guy with almost as much experience who's got all the information of what's going on.
I just don't know if McCain wants to run again, especially in 2012. I see it as an easy win for Obama if he manages to do anything at all, like Bush in 2004. (I also think that's why you never saw Hillary go in on the 2004 election, she was betting she couldn't beat Bush.) And if you put McCain in 2016, he's upto what, 90? You might be hitting a record there.But I could see him running in 2012 as "the fall guy" if it's obvious the republicans cannot oust Obama. Palin would also be good in 2012, it would keep her in the media and she's certainly not too young for a 2016 run. Maybe she'll be read one of those "How to be a politician for dummies" books first.
WAY too old, and losers don't typically rise from the ashes. mccain's own party doesn't like him, and i'm pretty sure he personally would not want to run.
i think the republicans will mount a serious challenge in 2012.......maybe pawlenty? no way they would ever run palin, she's a train wreck and i think they know that.
maybe. we'll see who gets rush's attention. ;-)Republicans nominate their losers
In keeping with this tradition, I predict they will nominate Romney. It's 'his turn'. Republicans tend to be very organized and predictable in their nominations.
ps - ITA, McCain will be waaaayyyy to old.
no way they would ever run palin, she's a train wreck and i think they know that.
i guess we'll see. i think she has her following, but will never attract the moderates that republicans need to win. as long as she keeps doing stupid things like hammering levi johnston, no way is she an asset.Palin has great press, has her recently best seller book out, will no doubt make frequent appearances on Fox news. She could be getting groomed for the position. Her daughters a few years older so they won't be an issue anymore.
What's wrong with McCain? Yeah, he'll be even older. But if he picked a highly experienced very qualified vice presidential candidate and kept detailed information it wouldn't be such a bad deal. You get McCain's experience at the risk of his health. When his health goes down you have a fall guy with almost as much experience who's got all the information of what's going on.
I just don't know if McCain wants to run again, especially in 2012. I see it as an easy win for Obama if he manages to do anything at all, like Bush in 2004. (I also think that's why you never saw Hillary go in on the 2004 election, she was betting she couldn't beat Bush.) And if you put McCain in 2016, he's upto what, 90? You might be hitting a record there.But I could see him running in 2012 as "the fall guy" if it's obvious the republicans cannot oust Obama. Palin would also be good in 2012, it would keep her in the media and she's certainly not too young for a 2016 run. Maybe she'll be read one of those "How to be a politician for dummies" books first.
If I recall correctly McCain said early in the primaries that this was the last time he was running for President regardless of the out come. So sorry, no McCain in 2012.
Yeah, that and the fact that he is unelectable.
That is nothing more than opinion, not fact.
good. ;-)Sarah Palin will be the choice of the hard right. That's who they all like. The hard right will not accept McCain or Romney or Gingrich.
(Newt has a new book out this week about George Washington.)
The republicans could really be split next vote.
The republicans could really be split next vote.
I wonder if you can name one? There actually is one. Hint: it was before primaries existed. Do you know when primaries started?
So you said none, then you said there was one. And now you're changing the goal post by bringing up primaries. Try to be consistant, my friend
How did he do in the 2008 election? Was that opinion, or fact?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?