Election Integrity: Most Voters Suspect Fraud

[VySky]

60%. I wouldn't have thought it would have been such a large percentage.

Acceptable risk folks?
================

A majority of voters suspect recent elections have been affected by cheating, and believe officials are ignoring the problem.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 60% of Likely U.S. voters think it is likely that cheating affected the outcomes of some races in last year’s midterm elections, including 37% who say it’s Very Likely. Thirty-five percent (35%) don’t believe it’s likely the 2022 midterms were affected by cheating, including 20% who think it’s Not At All Likely. (To see survey question wording,

Election Integrity: Most Voters Suspect Fraud

A majority of voters suspect recent elections have been affected by cheating, and believe officials are ignoring the problem.

www.rasmussenreports.com

 

[jnug]

Ah yes....one of the cornerstones of Rightie bullshit. Suspicion, conjecture, supposition ...the cornerstones of the CT world shoved down the electorate's throats 24/7.

 

[VySky]

Ah yes....one of the cornerstones of Rightie bullshit. Suspicion, conjecture, supposition ...the cornerstones of the CT world shoved down the electorate's throats 24/7.

So your assumption is calls were only made to Republican voters.

 

[j brown's body]

Gives one a real indication of how sick our society is that a sociopathic narcissist could influence so many people.

 

[NuffSaid]

“The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey”

Nah, there’s nothing weird about this tying of platform

Old people who watch Fox 24/7 have telephones and anyone can spam an online survey

 

[jnug]

So your assumption is calls were only made to Republican voters.

NOPE...didn't say that now did I. However the issue is NOT who was called. The issue is what is at the core of the interest in calling and polling this issue in the first place. What is the catalyst for that?

Hint: It ain't actual election fraud.

In addition, the entire spectrum of suspicion, conjecture and supposition has been elevated in the electorate's conscience because that is all they get anymore 24/7 from breathless talking heads, from bloggers, from propagandists posing as debaters, etc, etc, etc

 

[BirdinHand]

Does gerrymandering count as election fraud?

 

[VySky]

“The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey”

Nah, there’s nothing weird about this tying of platform

Old people who watch Fox 24/7 have telephones and anyone can spam an online survey

Deflection noted

 

[Mycroft]

60%. I wouldn't have thought it would have been such a large percentage.

Acceptable risk folks?
================

A majority of voters suspect recent elections have been affected by cheating, and believe officials are ignoring the problem.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 60% of Likely U.S. voters think it is likely that cheating affected the outcomes of some races in last year’s midterm elections, including 37% who say it’s Very Likely. Thirty-five percent (35%) don’t believe it’s likely the 2022 midterms were affected by cheating, including 20% who think it’s Not At All Likely. (To see survey question wording,

Election Integrity: Most Voters Suspect Fraud

A majority of voters suspect recent elections have been affected by cheating, and believe officials are ignoring the problem.

www.rasmussenreports.com

This is heartening news...if the poll is accurate.

I can't make a judgement on the accuracy of the poll because Rasmussen doesn't release their polling data unless you pay for it. I won't pay for it.

If this is accurate, this result means that the efforts of the Dems, Trump haters and Globalists to alter election results for their own purposes and to manipulate the voters into thinking it's not happening are failing. This will make them think twice about making those efforts in the next election.

 

[Slartibartfast]

It would be interesting to see where higher quality polling agencies land on this question.

 

[VySky]

This is heartening news...if the poll is accurate.

I can't make a judgement on the accuracy of the poll because Rasmussen doesn't release their polling data unless you pay for it. I won't pay for it.

If nothing else, this result means that the efforts of the Dems, Trump haters and Globalists to alter election results for their own purposes and to manipulate the voters into thinking it's not happening are failing. This will make them think twice about making those efforts in the next election.

Much like their Covid vaccine fAil

 

[NuffSaid]

Deflection noted

What deflection?
The poll is bullshit.
I’m not going to discuss a bunch of brainwashed democracy-hating anti Americans who don’t believe in election integrity.

 

[BlueTex]

So your assumption is calls were only made to Republican voters.

If they would have called me I would have said yes too... There are PLENTY of documented cases of the GQP committing voter fraud...

 

[Mycroft]

It would be interesting to see where higher quality polling agencies land on this question.

Sure. But first, you'd have to find and establish that another polling agency is "higher quality"...or, that Rasmussen is not higher quality.

 

[Slartibartfast]

Sure. But first, you'd have to find and establish that another polling agency is "higher quality"...or, that Rasmussen is not higher quality.

That's just generally well known at this point.

 

[BlueTex]

Sure. But first, you'd have to find and establish that another polling agency is "higher quality"...or, that Rasmussen is not higher quality.

Here are the questions they asked...

1* Which is more important: Making it easier for everybody to vote, or making sure there is no cheating in elections?

2* Many states now allow voting by mail. Does mail-in voting make it easier or harder to cheat in elections? Or does mail-in voting not make much difference in terms of election cheating?

3* How likely is it that cheating affected the outcomes of some races in last year's mid-term elections?

4* How likely is it that state and federal officials are ignoring evidence of widespread election fraud?

The 60% was for the third question...

 

[j brown's body]

Some evidence to support such a claim would be helpful.

 

[Mycroft]

That's just generally well known at this point.

"generally well known" is just another way of saying "public opinion". That's about as factual as saying it's "generally well known that Trump is a criminal".

 

[vegas giants]

60%. I wouldn't have thought it would have been such a large percentage.

Acceptable risk folks?
================

A majority of voters suspect recent elections have been affected by cheating, and believe officials are ignoring the problem.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 60% of Likely U.S. voters think it is likely that cheating affected the outcomes of some races in last year’s midterm elections, including 37% who say it’s Very Likely. Thirty-five percent (35%) don’t believe it’s likely the 2022 midterms were affected by cheating, including 20% who think it’s Not At All Likely. (To see survey question wording,

Election Integrity: Most Voters Suspect Fraud

A majority of voters suspect recent elections have been affected by cheating, and believe officials are ignoring the problem.

www.rasmussenreports.com

Then the Republicans should stop cheating

 

[Slartibartfast]

"generally well known" is just another way of saying "public opinion". That's about as factual as saying it's "generally well known that Trump is a criminal".

You are using another generally well known thing to try to disprove my point?

 

[Razoo]

ALEC Lied About Its Work on Election Suppression Bills​

The American Prospect
https://prospect.org › civil-rights › alec-lied-about-its-...

Sep 3, 2021 — When a broad coalition of more than 300 civil rights and democracy reform groups called for corporations to ditch the American Legislative ...

ALEC Held Third Voter Suppression Summit with Dark ...​

EXPOSEDbyCMD
https://www.exposedbycmd.org › 2022/10/14 › alec-h...

Oct 14, 2022 — The American Legislative Exchange Council held its third known voter suppression summit for state lawmakers on July 25 and 26 preceding its ...

• 
  

  ALEC “Academy” Featured a Who's Who of Voter ...​

  https://www.exposedbycmd.org › 2021/11/16 › alec-a...
  
  Nov 16, 2021 — While the July 26-28 session was ostensibly led by the dark money group Honest Elections Project, it was organized, hosted, and bankrolled ...

 

[IQ57]

We all know there is fraud. Some choose to ignore it because them have been emboldened by their own ignorance by the lies and propaganda they embrace.

“When we all lose, there are no winners.” - IQ57

It’s all in your mind.

 

[Razoo]

An “Academy” for state lawmakers on voter suppression strategies run by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) in July featured a veritable who’s who of the right-wing leaders behind this year’s disinformation campaign about voter fraud and assaults on voting rights across the country, documentsobtained by the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD) show.

While the July 26-28 session was ostensibly led by the dark money group Honest Elections Project, it was organized, hosted, and bankrolled by ALEC, despite repeated claims by its CEO, Lisa Nelson, that the group does not work on voting issues.

Nelson provided the formal welcome at the conference’s opening session, ALEC staff organized turnout, and ALEC provided two nights of accommodations at the five-star Grand America Hotel, five meals, and a $450 travel reimbursement for attendees. ALEC’s annual meeting was held at the same hotel immediately after the Academy.

An invite published by CMD in July stated that “13 legislators from across the country” would be in attendance, but the materials acquired by CMD do not include an attendance list.

Rather than email materials to ALEC lawmakers that may be subject to open records laws, ALEC distributed hard copies of the agenda at registration along with a “zip drive containing a resources document and a one-pager on your state’s election policies,” according to an email from Sarah Wall, ALEC’s manager of legislative outreach and coalitions, obtained by CMD. Wall’s email also lists Michael Bowman, president of ALEC Action, as a key contact for the event.

Nelson tipped her hand about ALEC’s voter suppression subterfuge in May at a meeting of the far-right Council for National Policy. Video of the event obtained by CMD shows Nelson speaking frankly about ALEC’s work on voting and revealing its plans to outsource model policy on the controversial topic to avert the spotlight. “We don’t have model policy. We will be developing that at the Honest Elections Project [Academy], through them,” Nelson said.

ALEC “Academy” Featured a Who's Who of Voter ...​

https://www.exposedbycmd.org › 2021/11/16 › alec-a...

 

[Mycroft]

You are using another generally well known thing to try to disprove my point?

I'm not trying to disprove your point, I'm showing that your point has no basis in fact.

I suggest you present established fact instead of trying to present opinion as fact.

 

[Dragonfly]

60%. I wouldn't have thought it would have been such a large percentage.

Acceptable risk folks?
================

A majority of voters suspect recent elections have been affected by cheating, and believe officials are ignoring the problem.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 60% of Likely U.S. voters think it is likely that cheating affected the outcomes of some races in last year’s midterm elections, including 37% who say it’s Very Likely. Thirty-five percent (35%) don’t believe it’s likely the 2022 midterms were affected by cheating, including 20% who think it’s Not At All Likely. (To see survey question wording,

Election Integrity: Most Voters Suspect Fraud

A majority of voters suspect recent elections have been affected by cheating, and believe officials are ignoring the problem.

www.rasmussenreports.com

Tell me something - can you name a republican/conservative who you think won/stole an election through fraudulent voting????