Israel accepts truce as Hamas rejects it as 'surrender' - Israel News, Ynetnews
The full text of the Egyptian cease-fire proposal - Diplomacy and Defense Israel News | Haaretz
Hamas declares they reject the cease fire but seems like the fire is lower, a few sirens were heard in villages around Gaza this morning but nothing on major cities.
Not quite accurate.
Hamas political wing accepts it and Hamas military wing rejects it whilest other groups within Gaza both reject and accept it.
Which simply brings forward another question: Why should Israel negotiate with an "organisation" that so obviously cant keep it`s **** together?
Nothing is as pathetic as such obvious disorder as one sees within Hamas.
(Reuters) Tue Jul 15, 2014 3:10am EDT - Israel approved an Egyptian-proposed deal that would halt the week-old Gaza shelling war on Tuesday but the Palestinian territory's dominant Hamas Islamists responded suspiciously, saying they had not been consulted by Cairo.
Hamas's armed wing vowed its attacks would "increase in ferocity and intensity" but Palestinian rocket salvoes waned ahead of the mooted start of mutual de-escalation at 0600 GMT.
...
Just now a salvo of rockets on Ashdod, I guess the cease fire is over...
How can there be a ceasefire when one part of one side has not agreed?
I've just read on a facebook post some italian leftards claiming that that's a "clear sign" that hamas is an Israeli government's puppet...Israel stopped firing. hamas didn't.
So no, no ceasefire.
Will be interesting to see how pro-Palestinians blame the Jews for this one.
Israel stopped firing. hamas didn't.
So no, no ceasefire.
Will be interesting to see how pro-Palestinians blame the Jews for this one.
A ceasefire (or truce) is a temporary stoppage of a war in which each side agrees with the other to suspend aggressive actions.
Dude...
Hence it cant be a ceasefire because both sides did not agree.
At best it is a stop of aggression by one side during negotiations.
Dude...
Hence it cant be a ceasefire because both sides did not agree.
At best it is a stop of aggression by one side during negotiations.
You can have unilateral ceasefires. A ceasefire is nothing more than a temporary cessation of fighting and/or violence. In any event this is silly quibbling. There was a was a ceasefire proposal put onto the table, one party accepted it's tenants and ceased firing, the other did not. Calling it a 'temporary suspension of aggression' is just deflection.
Well, one thing is clear. It is clearly Israel's fault. Now we just need to figure out why...
What? I said it wasn't a ceasefire because Hamas declined to stop firing rockets at civilians (i.e., it declined to cease engaging in war crimes)
What negotiations? It was very helpful in illustrating exactly what is going on. So unless you got a way to spin this to blame the Jews, it may be a bit difficult for you to continue on here.
Okay now I understand your comment better.. my bad.
The Egyptian-Palestinian-Israel negotiation.
Israel accepts truce as Hamas rejects it as 'surrender' - Israel News, Ynetnews
The full text of the Egyptian cease-fire proposal - Diplomacy and Defense Israel News | Haaretz
Hamas declares they reject the cease fire but seems like the fire is lower, a few sirens were heard in villages around Gaza this morning but nothing on major cities.
What negotiations?
Precisely. Hamas wasn't invited to negotiate a cease-fire and they only found out about it when the media started reporting it. Once again, its just another situation in which Hamas is told to give Israel whatever they want or Israel will bomb their civilian population. The Palestinians have been given the raw deal in every situation since 1948. They should be invited to the table at the very least.
I've just read on a facebook post some italian leftards claiming that that's a "clear sign" that hamas is an Israeli government's puppet...
Haters gonna hate...
Still waiting to see how someone can blame this on the Jews.
Don't suppose you want to actually blame Hamas?
Astounding. Not only is your statement utterly false, you're actually trying to blame Israel for adhering to a cease-fire agreement.Precisely. Hamas wasn't invited to negotiate a cease-fire and they only found out about it when the media started reporting it. Once again, its just another situation in which Hamas is told to give Israel whatever they want or Israel will bomb their civilian population. The Palestinians have been given the raw deal in every situation since 1948. They should be invited to the table at the very least.
Hamas had refused to discuss the terms of the cease-fire, while Israel has expressed its willingness to meet to negotiate the details of the deal.
Precisely. Hamas wasn't invited to negotiate a cease-fire and they only found out about it when the media started reporting it. Once again, its just another situation in which Hamas is told to give Israel whatever they want or Israel will bomb their civilian population. The Palestinians have been given the raw deal in every situation since 1948. They should be invited to the table at the very least.
You are right, I should do the same. It's a waste fo time and nerves.I've seen lots of idiotic comments on facebook posts and youtube over the years when it comes to the I/P situation. Idiots in all directions. I don't read them anymore, have not done for a good while.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?