What ever. A&E did the right thing by bringing him back.
Invade my personal space and I may just shoot you. No one has the right to get in another person's face. I'll take my chances with a jury on that.
factually wrong
They basically had to. Had they not, Glaad would attempted to organize boycotts.They should not have fired him in the first place. That was dumb. Guys like Phil should be given all the rope they want...all the better to watch him hang himself with it.
:lamo
Yep. Exactly as I said. Your assertions are wrong.
To bad you can't admit the truth.
They should not have fired him in the first place. That was dumb. Guys like Phil should be given all the rope they want...all the better to watch him hang himself with it.
Your's sure, sure.
factually wrong
Your's, sure.
factually wrong
And yet your assertions about the topic are wrong. Go figure.once again I am not the topic
good move backing off the lie you posted
So...stop acting like Robertson committed a crime. He has an opinion; he expressed it; you don't like it; welcome to the real world.
Like it, or not, not everyone is going to be ok with homosexuality. Pressuring people to remain silent about their negative views of homosexuality is no different than pressuring gays to remain silent about being gay.
But Duck Dynasty is not a show about one man's views. It resonates with a large audience because it is a show about family … a family that America has come to love. As you might have seen in many episodes, they come together to reflect and pray for unity, tolerance and forgiveness. These are three values that we at A+E Networks also feel strongly about.
We will also use this moment to launch a national public service campaign (PSA) promoting unity, tolerance and acceptance among all people, a message that supports our core values as a company and the values found in Duck Dynasty. These PSAs will air across our entire portfolio.
In addition, an A&E source says the family and the network are going to work together to promote tolerance.
And yet your assertions about the topic are wrong. Go figure.
And neither am I. So what do you call the following lie?
And yet I posted no lie.
The constant ignoring of the facts makes your postings wrong each and every time.
Fact: You were already told that they both being sins was not the comparison being discussed or the alleged comparison that has folks in an uproar.
You assumed and were wrong because of the assumption
He did not equate homosexuality to bestiality. Saying so is a lie. He made no such comparison.
He said they were sins. That is all.
Yeah, your's. You agreed already.
A&E can do whatever they want. And, they will need to live with the consequences. It looks to me like they caved to the Christian Coalition and Fox News Crowd. We'll see if anyone can up the ante and put more pressure on them or Phil's band of money-making duck lovers.he was justly punished thats all they had to do per their opinion of his behavior
The facts prove you wrong, as shown.weird i dont see one assertion in there, another dodge
facts destroy your post again
i will ask you again, please post and quote my assertions that are factually wrong we cant wait to read them
1.)A&E can do whatever they want.
2.) And, they will need to live with the consequences.
3.) It looks to me like they caved to the Christian Coalition and Fox News Crowd.
4.) We'll see if anyone can up the ante and put more pressure on them or Phil's band of money-making duck lovers.
The facts prove you wrong, as shown.
Nothing more needs to be said.
So stop dodging and admit you were wrong when you assumed.
:lamothats what i thought you got nothing and cant post any assertions
good move backing off the lie you posted
again simply provide any FACTS you have to support your false claims, even ONE will do
FACTS:
no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof
your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"
PROOF:
Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary
he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them
: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary
he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins
Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up
one shred of factual evidence you cant do it
A&E caves for using shows in the can they already paid for ?
I'm sure it was the threat of the rubber duck invasion.
'Duck Dynasty' supporters to flood A&E offices with tiny rubber ducks - NY Daily News
Nope yours are.
Even Phil agrees with me.
:lamo
Just more denial and deflection.
Your assertions were wrong, as shown.
Is whine what you have been giving us?"Even Phil agrees with me"... ha ha!!!
:lamoagain simply provide any FACTS you have to support your false claims, even ONE will do
FACTS:
no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof
your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"
PROOF:
Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary
he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them
: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary
he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins
Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up
one shred of factual evidence you cant do it
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?