The bridge too far from Brewer dealt with guns on campus, which she vetoed, just like she vetoed the recent 1062.
The same gun bill in Idaho right now.
And you have Joko comparing gun issues to what Palin said.
And Sen. Graham quipping we'll lose Alaska to Putin.
With friends like GOPs at this Present Moment Awareness, .......
You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink.Palin compared it to gun control. Listen to what she said.
Palin compared it to gun control. Listen to what she said.
We had a nuke in the 40's and japan didn't. If they also had a nuke, we might have been afraid to drop ours on them.And that would be a stupid comparison because nuclear warfare is used to destroy entire cities, and the levels we have entire countries or even the whole planet. Guns are used (properly anyway) as self defense or in defense of others. You don't use guns to take out the entire families and neighbors of your enemies, possibly even killing yourselves in the process, to halt the actions of some in power (unless you're a "bad guy").
We had a nuke in the 40's and japan didn't. If they also had a nuke, we might have been afraid to drop ours on them.
It's obvious you didn't watch the video...But that is not the situation we are discussing when it comes to Russia. We both have nukes, and we both have way more than enough to basically wipe out the human race on the planet (or at least take it to hunter-gatherer society levels), and everyone knows this. There is no need to have that many nukes on either side. It only takes a few to be able to counter the other side, no matter how many they have. You don't need to match their levels.
It's obvious you didn't watch the video...
So...I have read the thread. There is no need for the comments that were made, no matter what she actually meant because there is no way that we are going to reduce our nuclear arms to such a level that we would not still be a threat to Russia, so why bring it up?
So...
Since you didn't watch the video and her words in context...
You have a valid opinion... Based on other peoples biased opinion...
OK...
I will keep that in mind for future debates with you!
LOL...There is no context that could be made to warrant what she said to be taken seriously. At all.
LOL...
OK, if you say so...
You really should watch the relevant part of the video...
You are reading in your own bias.Knew there was no point in wasting my time because she said exactly what I thought and that was put out here and I stand by what I have posted. It was dumb. Continuing to build up nuclear arms in no way helps the situation because we already have more than enough to fight back and pretty much eradicate any country with the amount we have more than a few times over so scaling back on nuclear arms will in no way make our threat level rationally lower. If we fired off even half of the nuclear weapons we have today at any country, the world is pretty much screwed. Anyone who doesn't recognize that fact is an idiot.
You are reading in your own bias.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?