- Joined
- Jan 28, 2023
- Messages
- 8,886
- Reaction score
- 10,281
- Location
- Cincinnati, Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Okay now that is funny... good oneBlack Waymo cars are 3 times more likely to be shot by police.
All we have around here are pick up trucks and SUVs. Talk about dangerous drivers.I have encountered them a few times wandering around Phoenix. Twice I have given a Waymo car the finger and shouted "ASSHOLE". Being Phoenix I expected the driver's window to roll down followed by a gun pointed in my direction but nothing happened either time. As a result I have determined that Waymo cars are safer than Phoenix drivers.
All we have around here are pick up trucks and SUVs. Talk about dangerous drivers.
We also had a report from down south of us that a "lady" peed at a local Walmart parking lot.
Strange happenings all around us, some stranger than others.
Driverless Waymo gets pulled over by police and it's captured on body cam
This is something you probably didn't consider: self-driving Waymo cars can get pulled over by police. In fact, it happened last month in Phoenix and it was caught on body camera.www.fox10phoenix.com
Never really thought about it. Cameras able to determine its getting 'popped' and pull over?
I guess you just throw the ticket on the seat?
Was curious of the same. As some reads, 'someone' must be at fault.I would hope there's a mechanism in place to ticket/fine the rideshare corp in instances like this?.
Otherwise, I'm going to be very unhappy!
Should be no question, 'your' vehicle made an infraction, pay up and take points! Suspend the AV 'license'!Self-driving cars can receive parking tickets, but get off scot-free for violations while in motion if no driver is behind the wheel. In 2018 a test driver operating a Cruise car in self-driving mode was ticketed when the vehicle failed to yield to a pedestrian at a crosswalk. But traffic crimes committed by driverless vehicles can go unpunished since citations can only be issued to humans who were at the wheel.
"Technology evolves rapidly and, at times, faster than legislation or regulations can adapt to the changes," San Francisco's Police Chief Bill Scott wrote in the memo.
Was curious of the same. As some reads, 'someone' must be at fault.
Seems some places may still have some catching up to do law wise.
Driverless cars swerve traffic citations in California
Arizona and Texas are ahead in terms of regulating autonomous vehicleswww.theregister.com
Should be no question, 'your' vehicle made an infraction, pay up and take points! Suspend the AV 'license'!
Does appear though Arizona is up to date on being able to cite, and rightfully so, being apparently the largest market at present.
If there was an accident certainly a civil damages case to be made.And just as importantly, is there legal liability for these transgressions?
Absolutely should be. Someone(s) designed, programmed, and maintains these rides.And just as importantly, is there legal liability for these transgressions?
Construction areas can be tricky for even many people.If there was an accident certainly a civil damages case to be made.
But who is at fault? I gather from the cop's comments that there was a construction area involved. These cars have to make decisions to negotiate unusual situations.
Did the car's computer mess up, or was the traffic diversion set up improperly, or a bit of both?
imo, the car company is at fault. They are responsible for the vehicle and its programing.If there was an accident certainly a civil damages case to be made.
But who is at fault? I gather from the cop's comments that there was a construction area involved. These cars have to make decisions to negotiate unusual situations.
Did the car's computer mess up, or was the traffic diversion set up improperly, or a bit of both?
Driverless Waymo gets pulled over by police and it's captured on body cam
This is something you probably didn't consider: self-driving Waymo cars can get pulled over by police. In fact, it happened last month in Phoenix and it was caught on body camera.www.fox10phoenix.com
Never really thought about it. Cameras able to determine its getting 'popped' and pull over?
I guess you just throw the ticket on the seat?
I can't do that Michael. I have a passenger that needs to get to the airport.Bad KITT! Bad bad KITT! Back to the garage with you!
It would if the diversion is set up incorrectly and a driver became confused as a result.imo, the car company is at fault. They are responsible for the vehicle and its programing.
As far as your question regarding the traffic diversion set up. would that be a viable excuse if a human drove their car into the incoming traffic lane?
Maybe KITT, maybe HAL. HAL is indifferent to head on collisions.Bad KITT! Bad bad KITT! Back to the garage with you!
If there was an accident certainly a civil damages case to be made.
But who is at fault? I gather from the cop's comments that there was a construction area involved. These cars have to make decisions to negotiate unusual situations.
Did the car's computer mess up, or was the traffic diversion set up improperly, or a bit of both?
Maybe KITT, maybe HAL. HAL is indifferent to head on collisions.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?