It is however true. Hilter did impose an exit tax on the Jews.
His intellectual abilities pertaining to medicine are beyond question. His political philosophy thus far has proven to be absolutely cartoonish. Not all who are successful in other venues have a firm grasp on political or historical reality. Donald Trump immediately comes to mind.
You have no proof he is a homophobe...not unless you think that anybody who believes that marriage is only to be between one man an one woman, the traditional marriage, is a homophobe... and that those who want to change that should just be allowed because they think its right...Jury is out on that---he's clearly not a gun nut, but he is a homophobe and the comment about ACA being akin to slavery is off the hook.
We're talking about healthcare. Sorry but he's more expert than anyone in Congress. Thanks for playing.
You have no proof he is a homophobe...not unless you think that anybody who believes that marriage is only to be between one man an one woman, the traditional marriage, is a homophobe... and that those who want to change that should just be allowed because they think its right...
If you are against traditional marriage that makes you a heterophobe, does it?
Hitler was a vegetarian, was an artist, and liked dogs. He also breathed air, ate food, and was male. He had hair on his face and head and a mustache. None of which diminishes that fact that you've Godwin'ed your way to inanity.
Which even if true, fails to validate the statement that Carson made. If Robert Gates or Leon Panetta labeled the sequester cuts endured by the Military as the worst event since Slavery, they'd be wrong as well, no matter their expertise.We're talking about healthcare. Sorry but he's more expert than anyone in Congress. Thanks for playing.
Anyone?
Physicians of the 113th Congress « Patients Action Network
There are 20 physicians in the 113th Congress.
Which even if true, fails to validate the statement that Carson made. If Robert Gates or Leon Panetta labeled the sequester cuts endured by the Military as the worst event since Slavery, they'd be wrong as well, no matter their expertise.
Which even if true, fails to validate the statement that Carson made. If Robert Gates or Leon Panetta labeled the sequester cuts endured by the Military as the worst event since Slavery, they'd be wrong as well, no matter their expertise.
Except that sequester cuts don't have anything in common with slavery while some of the provisions of the ACA are involuntary servitude.
Carson's comment, while stupid, didn't directly compare the ACA to Slavery, but rather labeled it the worst thing since. My analogy was pointing out the absurdity of excusing stupid comments based on experience within one's field alone.Except that sequester cuts don't have anything in common with slavery while some of the provisions of the ACA are involuntary servitude.
That's a good question and I'm sorry that I don't have a good answer.
But guess what - I do agree that it does seem totally unfair.
Like a lot of things in life.
That's probably about as close as a liberal will ever get to admitting Obama had no business being elected President.
He wasn't the best choice in the primaries.
Electing someone else that's completely inexperienced isn't the answer.
He is one of, if not the, top Constitutional scholar in this country.
Nobody is experienced at being President until they are elected President.
Hey, if a log splitter turned attorney could do it, if a haberdasher could, if a peanut farmer, if a B actor could become a great one, if a community organizer can, if a former major league team owner/ oil speculator can do it... well, lets just say the future remains to be seen and I would guess your predictions seem premature at best...
...and I think we can let it go at that, for now...
Yes, but there's a point at which you've gotta wonder why President should be the very first elective office a person gets.
The guy's got less foreign policy experience than Sarah Palin. He can't even see Russia from his state.
But each and every one of those people held elected office before becoming President. Carter, Reagan, and Bush had been Governor. Lincoln, Truman and Obama had all been in Congress. Granted, Lincoln was a one-term representative 20 years before becoming President, but he was in Congress.
Absolutely nothing about the ACA is remotely comparable with slavery. I know it's a big thing among libertarians to compare anything compulsory to "slavery," but all that serves to do is make you look like you lack even a modicum of perspective.
Only in the fact that they are all deviant behaviors and they would all like to be accepted... and that we are not going to allow that if we can stop it...that is not homophobia...that is ordered society affirming.He compared homosexuality to bestiality and pedophilia. That's not a very intelligent viewpoint, especially coming from a doctor who should know better.
Median Ice?
What makes you think the government can tell people how to live their lives and somehow not violate their rights?
And so your point is that only previously elected people are qualified to hold office... seems like many of our previously elected presidents have been pretty poor at governing once in, our current high office holder a case in point.But each and every one of those people held elected office before becoming President. Carter, Reagan, and Bush had been Governor. Lincoln, Truman and Obama had all been in Congress. Granted, Lincoln was a one-term representative 20 years before becoming President, but he was in Congress.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?