No, I think she would create loophole exemptions in the EPA to donors and more deductions for "green" companies. Chocolate cake commercial, delusional at best. As for the DOE she would have further eroded local control and given more control to the Feds because that's exactly who she is and part of why she lost.
Give me a break. Again, you complain about money, yet its undeniable Trump spent less than Hillary, what does that tell you?
You're confusing financial susceptibility and general corruption with campaign spending.
We know a foreign power spent money on his behalf. Don't you suppose that's also corruption?
Absurd argument. They didn't ask if they could, they just did so. On the other hand, DNC opposition research firm Fusion GPS knowingly made use of information obtained through the same foreign power. That's corruption being used as a choice rather than ads being taken out that you don't know about.
Look, when Bernie raises $25 donations from millions of Americans, that's not corruption.
When President Trump puts four dozen lobbyists to oversee the industries that they are intimately involved in, that's corruption.
You are not doing yourself any favors by deflecting to "the other side did it". What we have are observations in President Trump's administration that merit criticism. When we neglect to criticize our leadership, we give them free reign to abuse their power. Why would any American abide a government that forsakes the checks and balances constructed by the founders?
They could kick her out.
No, they could not. Give evidence to support your claim, please.
LOL, not talking about Sanders...AT ALL.
I am not deflecting anything. The corruption of the foreign ads did not stem from the Trump campaign. The deliberate use of political dirt from foreign sources IS corruption.
best joke i have seen in a long while
good one
"It must suck to hijack your party, steal a nomination, turn DNC into money laundromat,
bury any evidence against you, finance fake dossier, swipe the debate questions, and promise
free everything; yet still lose to someone you call incompetent.”
"It must suck to hijack your party, steal a nomination, turn DNC into money laundromat,
bury any evidence against you, finance fake dossier, swipe the debate questions, and promise
free everything; yet still lose to someone you call incompetent.”
No, it's not. You're engaging in whataboutism in response to my criticism of President Trump's corruption.
if only anything you said had any truth whatsoever. But alas, it doesn't.
That was all true. Truth hurts, eh?
It would hurt... if it only were true. But such lies break apart on the shore without a sound.
Hijacked her party---true
Stole a nomination---true
Turned the DNC into a money laundrymat---true
Bury evidence against you---true
Finance a fake dossier---true
Swipe debate questions---true
Promise free things---true
What's false again or are you going to after another bumper sticker philosophy?
Hijacked her party---true
Stole a nomination---true
Turned the DNC into a money laundrymat---true
Bury evidence against you---true
Finance a fake dossier---true
Swipe debate questions---true
Promise free things---true
What's false again or are you going to after another bumper sticker philosophy?
I'd like to read more about this but going on your track record, I'm sure you don't need to read a damn thing to come to this conclusion
WTF are you even talking about?
Not a fake dossier. Some has been proven true other parts have not been debunked. So... HUGE fat lie.
Donna Brazile did Not hillary so... another lie.
And this is you pushing republican bumper sticker bull****.
I'll let you know when you may get anything right. So far... it's not looking good for you.
best joke i have seen in a long while
good one
What corruption? He did not ask for the ads, he did not pay for them. You are connecting him to things outside his purview and control and calling it his fault, and then labeling it corruption.
It's not his fault that he issued ethics waivers so he could appoint lobbyists to manage industries they're already waist deep in....?
Do you hear how ****ing stupid that claim sounds?
The goalposts just went to another stadium. Can you make a consistent argument for two whole posts please?
Look, when Bernie raises $25 donations from millions of Americans, that's not corruption.
When President Trump puts four dozen lobbyists to oversee the industries that they are intimately involved in, that's corruption.
You are not doing yourself any favors by deflecting to "the other side did it". What we have are observations in President Trump's administration that merit criticism. When we neglect to criticize our leadership, we give them free reign to abuse their power. Why would any American abide a government that forsakes the checks and balances constructed by the founders?
this part:May I ask...what part of Trump being a representative of the American people, do you find so funny?
Trump is actually for the American workers.
was sharing my amusement at such a stupid, stupid statementOr are you just trolling...?
this part:
was sharing my amusement at such a stupid, stupid statement
May I ask...what part of Trump being a representative of the American people, do you find so funny?
Or are you just trolling...?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?