- Joined
- Mar 13, 2025
- Messages
- 254
- Reaction score
- 285
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Trump is correct on all of that.
Trump is correct on all of that.
There is a porn star named Simone W. Moon.the guy who wants the gov to violate the 2nd amendment
the guy who called for the termination of the Constitution
is the guy you think is right
He represents those of us that voted for him.Correct in what? Suppressing anything he doesn't like?
Yes, because that's the idea America was founded on, right?
Ah, so when you say the half the voters "hate us," what you really mean is that you’re projecting--furiously, and with no small measure of irony, because if anyone has treated this country with contempt, debased its values, and dragged its institutions through the mud, it's not “our ilk”--it’s your standard-bearer, Donald J. Trump, and I'll leave the gullible who voted for him out of it, for now, anyway.He represents those of us that voted for him.
It isn't he that wants to suppress liberals it's over half the voters that do.
That's how much the nation hates you and your ilk and what you've done to our country.
I'll take you word for it.There is a porn star named Simone W. Moon.
That isn't you by any chance is it?
Lincoln dumped the constitution, and it worked out fine.I'll take you word for it.
no thoughts to share about how you support the guy who wants the govt to violate the 2nd Amendment
no thoughts to share about how you support the guy who called for terminating the US Constitution
sounds about right
lolLincoln dumped the constitution, and it worked out fine.
Clear sign that Trumps economic policies are doing well.......
Are you upset because only liberals are allowed to be partisan?Trump is a man who made a career of sneering at intellectuals, decrying facts as "fake," and slandering the press as "enemies of the people" presumed to lecture the academy on the sanctity of free speech. With all the subtlety of a wrecking ball in a library, his administration launched a campaign not to defend expression, but to conscript it--to police the discourse of universities and force it into the uniform of right-wing orthodoxy.
Under the false banner of "protecting free inquiry," Trump issued an executive order threatening to strip funding from universities that failed to accommodate the grievances of the aggrieved conservative ego. This was not liberty--it was blackmail. Institutions were told: suppress student dissent against our favored speakers or risk your research grants. It was free speech on condition it served the state’s ideological appetites. A kind of Orwellian absurdity in which coerced compliance was paraded as academic freedom.
And what did this "freedom" consist of? Not the defense of pluralism, but the elevation of grievance. Not an even-handed commitment to open dialogue, but a shrill fixation on the imagined oppression of right-wing pundits who mistake heckling for persecution and cannot distinguish between protest and censorship.
Worse still, Trump and his proxies sought to rewrite curricula, denouncing entire disciplines as treasonous and ordering the creation of a jingoistic “1776 Commission” to cleanse the historical record of inconvenient truths. It was not enough to shout down dissent; they aimed to expunge it.
So this is a grotesque attempt to leash the liberty of the mind to the whims of political power--and to call that tyranny "freedom" is an insult to the word and all who have fought to preserve it.
1. Executive Order Threatening Funding Based on Speech Codes (March 2019)
Trump signed an executive order directing federal agencies to withhold research funds from universities that failed to "promote free inquiry."
[*]Problem: The order did not define “free inquiry” in concrete or neutral terms, opening the door to partisan interpretation.
[*]Threat: It effectively politicized academic funding, implying that schools could be punished for speech deemed hostile to conservative ideas—even if those ideas are challenged by students or faculty using their own free speech rights.
[*]Result: This incentivized universities to suppress student protests or dissent against conservative speakers, chilling left-leaning speech to protect federal funding.
2. Selective Defense of Conservative Speech Only
Trump and his allies routinely framed the issue of campus free speech as a one-sided culture war in which only conservatives were being silenced.
[*]At CPAC and rallies, Trump referenced isolated incidents--e.g., a conservative student being punched or a speaker being heckled--as proof of widespread suppression.
[*]Yet there was no similar concern when leftist speakers, faculty, or protesters were harassed, disinvited, or censored (e.g., Palestinians, Black Lives Matter activists, or critics of Israel).
[*]The First Amendment protects all speech, not just ideological allies. By weaponizing "free speech" as a partisan cudgel, Trump reduced it to a slogan, not a principle.
3. DOJ and DOE Investigations into "Bias"
Trump’s Departments of Justice and Education launched investigations into universities for alleged anti-conservative bias or supposed violations of free speech.
[*]These were often politically motivated and lacked clear legal grounding.
[*]In some cases, universities were pressured to alter disciplinary policies to avoid federal scrutiny—again, chilling academic autonomy and student activism.
[*]Meanwhile, the administration showed no interest in investigating censorship of leftist voices on campus.
4. Attacks on Academic Freedom
Trump repeatedly demonized entire fields of study as politically suspect:
[*]He called critical race theory "toxic propaganda."
[*]He vowed to cut funding to schools teaching ideas he labeled "un-American."
[*]He ordered the creation of a "1776 Commission" as a nationalist counter to historical curricula that addressed slavery or systemic racism.
This isn't free speech--it's state-imposed narrative control, cloaked in patriotic language.
The Ironic Twist: Demanding "Free Speech" While Encouraging Retaliation
Trump created a chilling environment by encouraging:
[*]Doxxing of professors
[*]Student surveillance (e.g., Campus Reform and Turning Point USA’s "Professor Watchlist")
[*]Threats of legislative punishment for speech he disagreed with
What was censorship under Obama and Biden called?It's called authoritarianism.
So MAGA in general doesn't believe in free speech.He represents those of us that voted for him.
It isn't he that wants to suppress liberals it's over half the voters that do.
That's how much the nation hates you and your ilk and what you've done to our country.
Does MAGA cult mean anything to you?Trump is correct on all of that.
And 50% or more of the US population can’t read at a high school level.He represents those of us that voted for him.
It isn't he that wants to suppress liberals it's over half the voters that do.
That's how much the nation hates you and your ilk and what you've done to our country.
The reason Trump won was by promising lower prices during a time of high inflation. Not that complicated.He represents those of us that voted for him.
It isn't he that wants to suppress liberals it's over half the voters that do.
That's how much the nation hates you and your ilk and what you've done to our country.
That's because schools would rather have a transgenders read to the kids instead of teaching them how to read themselves.And 50% or more of the US population can’t read at a high school level.
So
I don’t look to individuals who are uneducated and unintelligent to guide society - nor do I place a great deal of value on their opinions.
You can “hate” whatever “ilk” you like.
That’s not a reflection on anyone but you. And it really isn’t a badge of honor or pride, except perhaps amongst those of low intelligence
Hate speech isn't free speech and that's the only type of speech the left knows.So MAGA in general doesn't believe in free speech.
Got it.
So, you can predict the future now?lol
Are you equivocating or merely ignorant?
Somehow despite the Constitution being "terminated" by Lincoln it remained in effect for quite some time afterward—up until the present day as a matter of fact.
lolHate speech isn't free speech and that's the only type of speech the left knows.
If he was the leader of N. Korea or perhaps China, I could agree with you. He's not, you're wrong.Trump is correct on all of that.
You had a transgender teacher that read to you?That's because schools would rather have a transgenders read to the kids instead of teaching them how to read themselves.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?