• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Does DNA prove the existence of a God?

R

Rambozo

Banned
Joined
Aug 21, 2025
Messages
444
Reaction score
32
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed

DNA ABCs | Ask A Biologist

DNA is the ultimate how-to guide used by all living things. It packages all the instructions for building maintaining all our life forms and it easily fits inside a cell.Also in: Español
askabiologist.asu.edu

Our DNA is one of the ultimate instruction guides. It is more complex than any how-to book you have ever used. The full set of instructions is so long that it would take more than 3,000 books to print it out. Each book would have 1,000 pages and each page 1,000 letters. To read these instructions would take more than nine years. Even if you had the time to read all of them, there is a catch. The entire instruction guide is written in code. A simple set of letters “A T G C” are all that you would find on the pages.

DNA is the equivalent of 3,000 books, each of which are 1,000 pages long.

A book would obviously have to have an author, so this suggests that DNA must have a creator. Discuss.
 
do you have any clue as to what an analogy is? Here is a clue. DNA is not a book.
 

Who (or what) obviously created that “author”. Discuss.
 
God is vastly more complicated than DNA. So if the complexity of DNA proves there is a creator, then the complexity of God proves another creator, ad infinitum.

Logic courses should be required beginning in high school.
 
01000101 01110110 01100101 01110010 01111001 01110100 01101000 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100111 01110010 01100101 00100000 01110100 01111001 01110000 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01101000 01100101 01110010 01100101 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01101111 01101110 00101111 01101111 01100110 01100110 00101100 00100000 01101111 01101110 01100101 01110011 00100000 01100001 01101110 01100100 00100000 01111010 01100101 01110010 01101111 01110011 00101110 00001010 01010011 01100101 01100101 00100000 01101000 01101111 01110111 00100000 01101100 01101111 01101110 01100111 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100001 01110100 00100000 01100010 01100101 01100011 01101111 01101101 01100101 01110011 00100000 01110111 01101000 01100101 01101110 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100111 01110010 01100101 00100000 01110111 01101111 01110010 01101011 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01110111 01101001 01110100 01101000 00100000 01100110 01100101 01110111 00100000 01100011 01101000 01100001 01110010 01100001 01100011 01110100 01100101 01110010 01110011 00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 01100011 01101111 01100100 01100101 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 01100101 01111000 01110000 01110010 01100101 01110011 01110011 00100000 01110011 01101111 01101101 01100101 01110100 01101000 01101001 01101110 01100111 00111111

Text to Binary Converter

ASCII/Unicode text to binary code encoder. English to binary. Name to binary.
www.rapidtables.com
 
I think it was Odin and his brothers, Vili and Ve.
 
Last edited:



It at least suggests Intelligent Design. Who is, or are the Designers is open to question. But self assembly of DNA is pure nonsense
 
Juin said:
How?
Click to expand...
Because the foundation of the field is the self-assembly of DNA.

It’s an observed phenomenon and reliably repeatable.

A-T and G-C cells will bond to one another.

Like Lego bricks.
 
BirdinHand said:
Because the foundation of the field is the self-assembly of DNA.

It’s an observed phenomenon and reliably repeatable.

A-T and G-C cells will bond to one another.

Like Lego bricks.
Click to expand...
Lego bricks, that's a good way of putting it.
 

Rambozo said:
DNA is the equivalent of 3,000 books, each of which are 1,000 pages long.

A book would obviously have to have an author, so this suggests that DNA must have a creator. Discuss.
Click to expand...

not much to discuss, the Evidence is obvious if you look for it.

The full set of instructions is so long that it would take more than 3,000 books to print it out.

meh, so Nothing created all of this? keep trying and failing.


blessings, Zero Days.

.
 
Juin said:
It at least suggests Intelligent Design. Who is, or are the Designers is open to question. But self assembly of DNA is pure nonsense
Click to expand...
If DNA is used as evidence of design, then this designer used evolution.

What DNA proves is evolution, not God.
 
NO.
 
Revelation said:
not much to discuss, the Evidence is obvious if you look for it.
The full set of instructions is so long that it would take more than 3,000 books to print it out.
meh, so Nothing created all of this? keep trying and failing.
blessings, Zero Days.
Click to expand...


Its by thousands of time far easier for a pyramid to assemble itself without the hand of some intelligence than for the case of dna.

Its kind of funny that when folks run into the ruins of some pyramid they quite easily conclude the operation of some intelligent beings; but an extremely more complex assembly like dna they try to pretend off as random self assembly
 
Juin said:
No, Designer did not
Click to expand...
Yes, as proven by DNA.

If you're using DNA as evidence of something, evolution would be the prime example.

Juin said:
All one can examine is whether dna is evidence of design. The designer can be anything or things
Click to expand...
DNA is evidence of common decent. Evolution.
 
Michael Cole said:
Yes, as proven by DNA.
If you're using DNA as evidence of something, evolution would be the prime example.
Click to expand...


No, its not. Evolution is an independent thesis that has to stand of fall on its own
 
Juin said:
All one can examine is whether dna is evidence of design. The designer can be anything or things
Click to expand...
In other words, a figment of the imagination.
Juin said:
No, its not. Evolution is an independent thesis that has to stand of fall on its own
Click to expand...
Evolution stands. It's stood against scrutiny for nearly 170 years.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…