DOE: A Critical Review of Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the U.S. Climate

[Steve Case]

A first step would have been to expand the working group both to be able to answer the public questions to the report as well as let more scientists review the findings. Instead they simply gave up and shut down the group.

While for example the IPCC have been able to withstand decades of scrutiny from scientists, politcians, corporations, NGO and many others.

About — IPCC

www.ipcc.ch

While for example the IPCC have been able to withstand decades of scrutiny from scientists, politcians, corporations, NGO and many others.

And you provide a link to none other than the IPCC.

 

[Volunteer]

While for example the IPCC have been able to withstand decades of scrutiny from scientists, politcians, corporations, NGO and many others.

And you provide a link to none other than the IPCC.

You've been around this board long enough to have read many of his links.

 

[Lord of Planar]

If the report had any credibility it would of course had led to further studies.

The report was done well and did not need more.

While the authors wouldn't even both to answer the public comments from the scientific community. From my source:

"The report generated concerted pushback from the scientific community. More than 100 climate scientists – many of whom coordinated their efforts – submitted over 400 pages in public comments to the Energy Department last week."

That is probably because it puts future federal grant money in jeopardy for them. They are likely pissed that the spigot may be turned off.

Have you seen the 400 pages of comments?

Lets see. If 200 authors complain about losing grants, and submit 2 pages each, is that actually valid? have you seen the contents of those pages? I have not. I would like to. How about you.

But to take the word of CNN on politically charged controversial issues is very, very foolish.

I read the report. it was done exceptionally well, and I do not see where these people have a leg to stand on.

 

[Lord of Planar]

How do you know the report didn’t generate further studies?

It appears he believes the spin the CNN talking heads placed on it.

 

[Lord of Planar]

A first step would have been to expand the working group both to be able to answer the public questions to the report as well as let more scientists review the findings. Instead they simply gave up and shut down the group.

Well then pay for that is you want it done.

While for example the IPCC have been able to withstand decades of scrutiny from scientists, politcians, corporations, NGO and many others.

It withstands scrutiny by making scientists lose their jobs that disagrees with them., they are bullies and anti-science. They have an agenda. Period.

just ask Judith Curry, and others.

About — IPCC

www.ipcc.ch

Every time you link the IPCCC without the actual science and explanation, you just show everyone you really do not understand.

 

[Lord of Planar]

You've been around this board long enough to have read many of his links.

Yep.

Berg has spam and propaganda. Over and over. Same shit over and over.

 

[Bergslagstroll]

The report was done well and did not need more.

That is probably because it puts future federal grant money in jeopardy for them. They are likely pissed that the spigot may be turned off.

Have you seen the 400 pages of comments?

Lets see. If 200 authors complain about losing grants, and submit 2 pages each, is that actually valid? have you seen the contents of those pages? I have not. I would like to. How about you.

But to take the word of CNN on politically charged controversial issues is very, very foolish.

I read the report. it was done exceptionally well, and I do not see where these people have a leg to stand on.

Trump has made massive cuts to climate science and research. So any scientists that only cared about keeping their jobs and grant money would do anything to confirm the DoE report. Instead the scientific community showed what a shame the report was. There neither the scientists behind the report nor any other contrarian scientists could answer the public questions and the errors found in the report so the group was shut down.

Inside Trump’s campaign to censor climate science - Grantham Research Institute on climate change and the environment

Efforts to erase climate data in the US undermine scientific institutions, threaten global climate preparedness and deepen inequalities in a warming world.

www.lse.ac.uk

https://www.npr.org/2025/09/02/nx-s1-5521384/energy-report-scientists-climate-change

 

[Lord of Planar]

Trump has made massive cuts to climate science and research.

The federal government needed to cut that spending long ago. we are so damn deep in debt, it is crazy.

So any scientists that only cared about keeping their jobs and grant money would do anything to confirm the DoE report. Instead the scientific community showed what a shame the report was. There neither the scientists behind the report nor any other contrarian scientists could answer the public questions and the errors found in the report so the group was shut down.

Inside Trump’s campaign to censor climate science - Grantham Research Institute on climate change and the environment

Efforts to erase climate data in the US undermine scientific institutions, threaten global climate preparedness and deepen inequalities in a warming world.

www.lse.ac.uk

https://www.npr.org/2025/09/02/nx-s1-5521384/energy-report-scientists-climate-change

More crybabies...

I see there are broad allocations, no specifics. Looks like they have no valid critique.