No and neither were you so stop being ridiculous and asking silly things.
What you're saying is as absurd as saying you can't prove that General Lee didn't ride into battle during the Civil War on a unicorn. After all, you weren't there. But we have no reason to think that unicorns are real and all the evidence we have says it didn't happen, therefore it has been effectively debunked. The same is true of the Jesus myth. It violates everything that we know about the Roman occupation and how they carried out crucifixions. Clearly the accounts in the Bible were written by people unfamiliar with the actual practices. We already know that they were not written by the people whose names are on them. The whole thing is a ridiculous fabrication.
And you fell for it. That makes your opinion pretty suspect.
You are not reading. You are dismissing what is said, and what you just wrote has nothing to do with the the points made. I see a lot of denial of evidence and hand waving of the points due to preconceived notions.
No, more like my thinking differently when I wrote that. Lazarus was raised from the dead and that might be resurection. When I wrote that I was thinking resurection that will be forever.
There's no record of his second death. He might still be wandering around for all we know.
Just for clarification, it doesn't really matter what tradition and mythology say, only what actually happened in reality and according to all of the evidence we have, none of it ever occurred. What people believe about it is largely irrelevant.
No its not. You don't know what "debunked" is. A christian can not say the story of Mohammed is debunked just because they're christian. Words don't change meaning based on your identity or religion.
Who would be the host? Maybe Ryan Seacrest? I hope its some hot lesbian.
Actually, a Christian can say that parts of the story of Muhammed ARE debunked based on the reality of their belief system. I am using the word in a very narrow context.
doesnt matter im tired of seeing jack and jill fighting out a divorce,now i want to see frinaldo and javier screaming it out in divorce court.
Actually, no. You're still defining truth or non-truth based on a belief system that is based on faith. Its delusional to say that it isn't raining because my "belief system" says rain isn't possible. There's no context where faith = fact.
Since we are not taking about something verifiable and tangible like rain, your comment is irrelevant as your comparison doesn't work.
You have no idea what you're talking about. When shown you're wrong its best to stop digging.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?