• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Do you support asylum for White Afrikaner "refugees" in America? (1 Viewer)

Do you support asylum for White Afrikaner "refugees" in America?


  • Total voters
    49
this is a good answer


its got nothing to do with skin color
Well, in the current realm of 2025 asylum claiming in the US - it surely does seem to have a racial component.

Brown and black asylum seekers are being deported and/or turned away at our borders.

White ones are being solicited and flown in at tax payers expense and greeted with a party.
 
this is a good answer


its got nothing to do with skin color

Um, yes it does. Otherwise black and brown asylum claims, in the midst of actual genocide, wouldn't be shut down by this same administration. With your blessing.

What are White Afrikaners fleeing from that requires refugee asylum?
 
I support asylum for any refugee who is trying to flee violence and persecution in their home country.

Not one group in preference to any other.

Yeah, this, but damn it's getting near impossible to have a serious conversation where America is involved... one where you can only talk about one thing at a time.
 
Um, yes it does. Otherwise black and brown asylum claims, in the midst of actual genocide, wouldn't be shut down by this same administration. With your blessing.

What are White Afrikaners fleeing from that requires refugee asylum?

Yeah, this is what i mean. It's impossible to talk about one thing at a time with you guys.

Like, yes, all refugees should be helped by countries that claim to be decent, irrespective of skin color or any other defining characteristic.

But you guys kinda don't do that, which will become the thread topic, rather than whether or not these folks are deserving of refugee status, whether it's a good thing or not that America is letting them into the country, etc.

Everything is everything, I guess.
 
How is this not a clear example of racial preference of whites and discrimination again black and brown refugees fleeing infinitely worse conditions? Anyone? Bueller?

Yes, yes, we get what you're trying to say, but the answer to the question you asked is yes, they should be helped if a need for help can be demonstrated.
 
How is this not a clear example of racial preference of whites and discrimination again black and brown refugees fleeing infinitely worse conditions? Anyone? Bueller?
I have no doubt that there are valid asylum claims coming from South Africa.

I also have no doubt that our current policies and political climate - including what refugees we are/are not accepting - is racially motivated.

The two things are not mutually exclusive.

Glaring example of hypocrisy? Yes.

I’m not going to make assumptions about the asylum claimants.

Whereas I think the motivations and actions by the current US government are most definitely driven by racism and preferential treatments.
 
Yeah, this is what i mean. It's impossible to talk about one thing at a time with you guys.

Like, yes, all refugees should be helped by countries that claim to be decent, irrespective of skin color or any other defining characteristic.

But you guys kinda don't do that, which will become the thread topic, rather than whether or not these folks are deserving of refugee status, whether it's a good thing or not that America is letting them into the country, etc.

Everything is everything, I guess.

What the hell are you even talking about? What's your actual point? Can you just say it without the gobbledygook?
 
This is an apparent case of favoring white people and playing to the Trump cult. There is no genocide taking place and these people don’t come close to qualifying as refugees whose lives are in imminent danger. Trump lies again and his cult falls for it.
 
I have no doubt that there are valid asylum claims coming from South Africa.

I also have no doubt that our current policies and political climate - including what refugees we are/are not accepting - is racially motivated.

The two things are not mutually exclusive.

Glaring example of hypocrisy? Yes.

I’m not going to make assumptions about the asylum claimants.

Whereas I think the motivations and actions by the current US government are most definitely driven by racism and preferential treatments.

I am going to make assumptions, since Trump spouted white genocide nonsense to defend these refugees. If your first defense of a racially motivated policy is a ridiculous, bombastic, gas-lighting lie, what are they are concealing? Will we ever know?
 
Yes, yes, we get what you're trying to say, but the answer to the question you asked is yes, they should be helped if a need for help can be demonstrated.

LOL what are you accusing me of?
 
Well, in the current realm of 2025 asylum claiming in the US - it surely does seem to have a racial component.

Brown and black asylum seekers are being deported and/or turned away at our borders.

White ones are being solicited and flown in at tax payers expense and greeted with a party.

because they're illegally here

whites illegally here will get deported too
 
What the hell are you even talking about? What's your actual point? Can you just say it without the gobbledygook?

I could, but your maga tactics are as tired coming from the left as they are coming from the right, and I haven't had my coffee yet. I wasn't rude to you, and your rudeness bores the shit out of me.

Have fun with your thread, I'm off to get that coffee. Don't worry, I know how it goes, everybody has the script memorized by now.
 
This is an apparent case of favoring white people and playing to the Trump cult. There is no genocide taking place and these people don’t come close to qualifying as refugees whose lives are in imminent danger. Trump lies again and his cult falls for it.
Exactly. It's just another racist dog whistle coming from the Trump administration. The idea probably originated with Herr Miller.
 
Um, yes it does. Otherwise black and brown asylum claims, in the midst of actual genocide, wouldn't be shut down by this same administration. With your blessing.

What are White Afrikaners fleeing from that requires refugee asylum?

link to that please
 
I could, but your maga tactics are as tired coming from the left as they are coming from the right, and I haven't had my coffee yet. I wasn't rude to you, and your rudeness bores the shit out of me.

Have fun with your thread, I'm off to get that coffee. Don't worry, I know how it goes, everybody has the script memorized by now.

I didn't accuse you of anything, you came at me with both-sides gas-lighting nonsense. How do you want me to respond to that?
 
I am going to make assumptions, since Trump spouted white genocide nonsense to defend these refugees. If your first defense of a racially motivated policy is a ridiculous, bombastic, gas-lighting lie, what are they are concealing? Will we ever know?
My first defense?

Please show your work and evidence of where I’ve defended current US immigration and/or asylum policies in any way or retract your bold faced lie.
 
link to that please



 
My first defense?

Please show your work and evidence of where I’ve defended current US immigration and/or asylum policies in any way or retract your bold faced lie.

No, I'm saying Trump's first defense. Sorry, that 'your' wasn't directed at you.
 
I didn't accuse you of anything, you came at me with both-sides gas-lighting nonsense. How do you want me to respond to that?

I was agreeing with you and making an observation. I was commiserating the state you have arrived at as a country, where the simple decent act of helping refugees cannot be discussed without also discussing the cruel and hypocritical nature of your immigration practices under the current administration.

And somehow that inspired you to come at me.

OK.

Good thread. 🤷‍♂️
 

'A handful of white South Africans have sought refugee status in other countries in the past few decades. In 2009, a white South African was granted refugee status in Canada, saying he feared violence and discrimination against him as a member of the white minority. His status was later overturned by a Canadian federal court. In 2014, another white family was granted refugee status in Canada based on the threat of gender-based or racial violence in South Africa.

Frelick said that according to UNHCR numbers, no one from South Africa, regardless of race, had applied for refugee status in the previous year, though he added that someone could have applied outside the UNHCR process.

“This is not something that I even recognize as a refugee situation.” Frelick said.'

...

This is a slap-you-in-the-face race-based preference for white people. How on Earth can anyone say any differently? People are fleeing genocide, brown or black skinned, they get turned away. White Afrikaners then immediately get refugee status... based on what? Based on apartheid ending 30 years ago?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom