Exploring and discussing taboos allows us to take a hard look at them and determine if there is an actual basis to them or if they were just long standing mythical hoo-ha.I find it odd that anyone would be interested in incest; seems a bit sketchy to me
I assume by your wording that you are only speaking of consanguineous sexual relations. And yes for the record, there are several states where the laws include adopted and step relations as well as marriage even if sex doesn't take place.I'm just curious to what your opinion is. To me (and probably 99.8% of people) incest is the worst crime, yes even worse than murder in many ways.
Is that you, President Trump?
I'm just curious to what your opinion is. To me (and probably 99.8% of people) incest is the worst crime, yes even worse than murder in many ways.
Exploring and discussing taboos allows us to take a hard look at them and determine if there is an actual basis to them or if they were just long standing mythical hoo-ha.
Sent from my Z982 using Tapatalk
incest is the worst crime, yes even worse than murder in many ways.
When discussing things like this, it is not necessarily about what you want. I personally might not want to be in an interracial or same sex marriage, but I can still discuss the merits for and against allowing it in society or by law.well, that is fine for others but for myself; I have absolutely ZERO interest in being sexually involved with anyone I am related to.
Everyone else? Knock yourselves out ...........
I'm just curious to what your opinion is. To me (and probably 99.8% of people) incest is the worst crime, yes even worse than murder in many ways.
I think the taboo against incest is that any child born of an incestuous relationship might be deformed. However, this would only happen if both parties carried deleterious genes. If incest happens between two people that have super-good genes, then the resultant child could have awesome genes.
Have we not read the story of how Adonis was born? He was born from a daughter tricking her father into having sex with her. You see, her father was so fine that the daughter lusted after him. And since he was hot, the girl, being his child, must have been hot, too. And when you have two very hot people procreating, the result is Adonis. Therefore, incest can sometimes be good.
When you breed for one trait, you wind up breeding out other, possibly desirable traits. That's why breeders have ruined so many dog breeds. When you breed for beauty, you're likely to get beautiful and stupid.
Well forgive the oversight, it's still sick.You just made an unfounded assumption. You assumed that incest between parent and offspring would happen when the offspring is still a minor. Or at least by jumping from siblings to minors, you left that impression.
Sent from my Z982 using Tapatalk
My point was not that we should breed for beauty. It was that it is possible to have desirable outcome for incestuous procreation. If the parties involved have few (or none) bad genes, then it's possible that the offspring will turn out healthy and normal.
Genes are sneaky bastards. The recessive ones hide out and pop up when you least expect them.
True; however, it is possible that an incestuous couple do not have any recessive, bad genes. Their baby would most likely to be healthy.
Why is it fine? Its still inbreeding, and its kind of gross too.
I'm just curious to what your opinion is. To me (and probably 99.8% of people) incest is the worst crime, yes even worse than murder in many ways.
I'm presuming you're referring to sexual abuse of a child by a family member, as opposed to primitive practices such as marrying your first cousin?I'm just curious to what your opinion is. To me (and probably 99.8% of people) incest is the worst crime, yes even worse than murder in many ways.
I'd first argue that the rather 'inbred' arguments above that aren't really worth addressing (since I doubt that many outside of a drug-ridden trailer park would spend their time and energy thinking much about incest to begin with, let alone pretend that such an evolutionarily ineffectual fancy or quaint notion of "rights" would ever be considered by civilized societies).First off, kids produced by incest are as much at risk of genetic disorder as kids from women in their 40s. Also, if there are no children then there are no genetic consequences at all. However I do see incest involving non-consenting adults as very wrong especially when there is an adult involved and incest is often the product of something very wrong with the people and the family. What is interesting is that if two sibilings are separated at birth there are many cases where they will fall in love when they meet as adults.
Here is an interesting documentary about it:
First off, kids produced by incest are as much at risk of genetic disorder as kids from women in their 40s.
However I do see incest involving non-consenting adults as very wrong especially when there is an adult involved and incest is often the product of something very wrong with the people and the family.
I'm presuming you're referring to sexual abuse of a child by a family member, as opposed to primitive practices such as marrying your first cousin?
I'm just curious to what your opinion is. To me (and probably 99.8% of people) incest is the worst crime, yes even worse than murder in many ways.
I'm just curious to what your opinion is. To me (and probably 99.8% of people) incest is the worst crime, yes even worse than murder in many ways.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?