Mueller Finds No Trump-Russia Conspiracy but Stops Short of Exonerating President on Obstruction of Justice - The New York Times
WASHINGTON — The investigation led by Robert S. Mueller III found that neither President Trump nor any of his aides conspired or coordinated with the Russian government’s 2016 election interference, according to a summary of the special counsel’s findings made public on Sunday by Attorney General William P. Barr.
Are you surprised that no evidence was found that the Trump administration conspired with the Russians to interfere with the 2016 election? Do you believe it?
Until we can read the complete Mueller Report one cannot answer this question.
I'm not surprised, most of these people are not smart enough to conspire and not get caught.Mueller Finds No Trump-Russia Conspiracy but Stops Short of Exonerating President on Obstruction of Justice - The New York Times
WASHINGTON — The investigation led by Robert S. Mueller III found that neither President Trump nor any of his aides conspired or coordinated with the Russian government’s 2016 election interference, according to a summary of the special counsel’s findings made public on Sunday by Attorney General William P. Barr.
Are you surprised that no evidence was found that the Trump administration conspired with the Russians to interfere with the 2016 election? Do you believe it?
You won't be reading the full report.
Which in and of itself should tell something.
Every American should read that complete report and examine the evidence that went into it.
Otherwise, we are relying on a partisan interpretation of selective conclusions.
i haven't seen the full report.
We damn well should.You won't see the full report.
You won't see the full report.
We damn well should.
Mueller is a partisan? Barr is a partisan?
Maybe, maybe not. I'm not privy to the legal aspects of that.
I do have to wonder, though, if there would still be calls for seeing the full report from the left if Barr had announced today that there WAS evidence of the Trump admin working with Russia. I'm sure the usual Trump-humpers would be demanding it, but I bet the other side would find Barr's report sufficient. Funny how politics work, huh?
Maybe, maybe not. I'm not privy to the legal aspects of that.
I do have to wonder, though, if there would still be calls for seeing the full report from the left if Barr had announced today that there WAS evidence of the Trump admin working with Russia. I'm sure the usual Trump-humpers would be demanding it, but I bet the other side would find Barr's report sufficient. Funny how politics work, huh?
Can't say, have not seen Mueller's findings. All we have is Barr's summation of Mueller's findings. Could be an accurate portrayal or just Barr's personal spin. We'll likely know more in the coming months.
Barr is indeed a partisan and his own personal record demonstrates this without a doubt.
Barr did a headlong rush to write the narrative letter he wanted us to have as our first impression (48 hours).
House Judiciary Chairman Nadler said he will have Barr before his committee to discuss the whole of it, to include the 48 hours from Barr receiving the report of the 22 months of investigation to Barr's mad dash letter to control the narrative.
The thread poll is impossible to pick and choose from because we have not read the Mueller report. The poll question asks us whether we believe the report. We haven't seen the report. All we have is the claims of the AG Wm Barr who can be regarded as Trump's Roy Cohn. We already have Rudy the Clown as Trump's roving mouthpiece lawyer. Indeed Barr is trying to give Trump free reign to run off the reservation with a clean slate.
Can't say, have not seen Mueller's findings. All we have is Barr's summation of Mueller's findings. Could be an accurate portrayal or just Barr's personal spin. We'll likely know more in the coming months.
Mueller Finds No Trump-Russia Conspiracy but Stops Short of Exonerating President on Obstruction of Justice - The New York Times
WASHINGTON — The investigation led by Robert S. Mueller III found that neither President Trump nor any of his aides conspired or coordinated with the Russian government’s 2016 election interference, according to a summary of the special counsel’s findings made public on Sunday by Attorney General William P. Barr.
Are you surprised that no evidence was found that the Trump administration conspired with the Russians to interfere with the 2016 election? Do you believe it?
Until we can read the complete Mueller Report one cannot answer this question.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?