He tried pulling that stunt, again, in this thread and I kept sending him back to the other one.
Not counting the incessant rambling quotes from The Gods, which for some reason seems to have more precedence than the written word. :lol:
still living in denial.....even after i posted pics of the actual document ratified with the preamble on them.
which by the way you wanted to see, and when i produced them you stated, well the preamble is not part of the ratified bill......:roll:
No. Only in the mind of the bigot.
You posted pics of the message from Congress that was sent to the states.
You really do not have a clue do you? :doh:shock:
The absolute nerve of some people making claims and then not being able to back them up. It is the worst sort of intellectual fraud.
message?..message?.......the actual bill of rights was not sent to each state to be ratified, even you should know that, copies were made of the bill of rights and sent out to the states to ratify it, i produced states copies, by posting to you pics, of those copies......and you tell me messages.......:lol:
thanks that my first laugh today!
Nice strawman of your own invention. :doh Okay - I am lying... its not a nice strawman but a really pathetic one. :roll: I never said the original was sent to the states. You are making a fool of yourself.
Why can't you simply post verifiable evidence that the Preamble to the Bill of Rights was ratified by the necessary number of states?
haymarket;1062006216]You posted pics of the message from Congress that was sent to the states.
You really do not have a clue do you? :doh:shock:
posted pics of the message?...message?
i posted clearly the pics of the actual copies that were used my the states to rarity the bill of rights, and everyone of those pics has the preamble on them...here they are again.
States ratify language.
Show us the verifiable evidence that the needed number of states ratified the Preamble of the Bill of Rights.
That picture of the action of Congress IS NOT IT. That picture is the COMPLETE work of Congress that was submitted to the States. Congress only voted to ratify PART of what Congress sent them and the Preamble was NOT part of what they ratified. That picture is NOT what was ratified.
Why are you impotent to present this evidence you claim exists?
He can't because there is none. LOL!Nice strawman of your own invention. :doh Okay - I am lying... its not a nice strawman but a really pathetic one. :roll: I never said the original was sent to the states. You are making a fool of yourself.
Why can't you simply post verifiable evidence that the Preamble to the Bill of Rights was ratified by the necessary number of states?
He can't because there is none. LOL!
One of the silliest arguments one can make is to pretend that if someone believes that another individual has the right to do something, that person must also advocate or support such action.
Not exactly what I said. But it is factual that only people who would benefit from not being banned from discriminating based on race, gender, or religion are those who would do that - the bigot.
people who discriminate are bigots, however being a bigot is not a crime.
they have the liberty to be racist, bigots, what ever kind of hate mongers they wish to me, has long as they dont commit crime, do something which could cause damage to a person of another persons property.
Didn't say it was. :roll:
Not exactly what I said. But it is factual that only people who would benefit from not being banned from discriminating based on race, gender, or religion are those who would do that - the bigot.
None of which proves your assertions that the Preamble to the Bill of Rights was ever ratified by the States and accepted as law. You have no proof of that because it never happened.all the clauses of the bill of rights are declaratory and restrictive clauses, as declared my the preamble statement.
all 12 clauses which were presented to the states for ratification, are declaratory and restrictive, out of the 12 declaratory and restrictive clauses ,only 10 were ratified , they were clauses 3 to 12, 1 and 2 were not ratified, however the original clause 2 was ratified in 1992
<snip - unrelated material>
None of which proves your assertions that the Preamble to the Bill of Rights was ever ratified by the States and accepted as law. You have no proof of that because it never happened.
For further discussion and a reminder of your last failure at proving this assertion please see ...
http://www.debatepolitics.com/polls/162276-can-you-legally-amend-bill-rights.html
that is irrelevant. Only stupid people want the right to smoke but I fully support their right to do so. and in the long run if you discriminate against good customers or workers based on bigoted or other silly reasons, the person you harm is yourself
No, you also hurttheperson you discriminate against. This was shown in the court case I linked. Unlike smoking, there is harm outside of the self. That's why it's important to know the history and context of the law and it was upheld.
what you are describing is feelings, the pain of rejection.
however feelings cannot be part of law, if they were people who being filing lawsuits every day, becuase peoples feelings are hurt all the time.
there is no right to protect ones feeling.
No, you also hurttheperson you discriminate against. This was shown in the court case I linked. Unlike smoking, there is harm outside of the self. That's why it's important to know the history and context of the law and it was upheld.
No, it isn't. That's just silly hyperbole on your part. If you read the court case, you'll know better.
actually not unless everyone who has the same business discriminates against them
however, I believe in the sanctity of private property and the right of (not) to associate over the expansion of the commerce clause that gave congress unintended power
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?