- Joined
- Aug 21, 2013
- Messages
- 23,086
- Reaction score
- 2,375
- Location
- United States
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Originally Posted by RAMOSS
No, RAMOSS is quite correct.
Modern Bible scholars mostly agree (the best ones, anyway).
Some of the "Gospel" mythology about Paul's "Christ" was clearly crafted to fit with chosen passages from the old stories called the "Old Testament."
That "Christ" was an invention of Paul, a modified version of various Pagan religions.
Well, that is the claim of some evangalistic CHritians.. however, they ignore and twist the evidence.
More nonsense.
Nope. Not a chance.
And by the way, if you CHOOSE to do your research, you'll find Paul agrees with Jesus on the main points of the faith.
Quote from link below: "Following is a brief alphabetical list comparing the words of Christ with the words of Paul. We can clearly see that they were indeed in agreement and that the critics who would set Paul against Christ don't know what they're talking about."
https://carm.org/questions/other-questions/did-jesus-and-paul-teach-same-thing
In all three religions, the history of Adam and Eve, through Abraham, Isaac, Joseph, the fleeing of the Jews from Egypt, The Great Flood- all of these things are historically taught in all three religions. I think that this is compelling evidence that the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Joseph is the same god celebrated by Jews, Christians, and Muslims today.
The Koran copied parts of the Bible and distorted other parts.
'Allah' isn't the same god as in the Bible.
"The God in the Bible is called the God of the Jews, an impossibility with Allah. They are called his chosen people, but they are not Allah’s chosen. Allah commands the Muslim to not take the Jews or Christians as friends (Sura.5:51 disdains the Jews). Mohammed said, “The last hour will not come before the Muslims fight the Jews, and the Muslims kill them.” (Mishkat Al Masabih Sh.M. Ashraf pp.147, 721, 810-11, 1130). So how could Israel inherit the land or any of God’s promises from Allah, if Allah is their God? Clearly he is not the same God of the Bible."
"Allah, the “Moon God - Before Muhammad the Arabs had 360 'gods'. Muhammad picked Allah (the Arab moon god). The Old Testament constantly rebuked the worship of the Moon-god (see: Deut. 4:19;17:3; II Kings. 21:3,5; 23:5; Jeremiah 8:2; 19:13; Zephaniah 1:5, etc.). When Israel fell into idolatry, it was usually the cult of the Moon-god. As a matter of fact, everywhere in the ancient world, the symbol of the crescent moon can be found on seal impressions, steles, pottery, amulets, clay tablets, cylinders, weights, earrings, necklaces, wall murals, etc. In Tell-el-Obeid, a copper calf was found with a crescent moon on its forehead."
That - and not the Bible - is the genesis of Allah.
https://righterreport.com/.../do-muslims-and-christians.../
Allah denies that Jesus is divine and that Jesus is the only begotten Son of God. God would not affirm his Son in Christianity and then deny him in Islam.
Roman Catholicism:
The Cult of Mary
Catholicism Is Of The Devil
Catholics Worship Statues!
A Godly Attitude Toward Heresy
What is “Heresy”?
The Wickedness Of Worshipping The Virgin Mother (Catholicism is a satanic cruel hoax!)
Old Time Religion EXPOSED!
Christianity and Judaism believe in the same Creator God.
Where they diverge is the Christian belief that Jesus of Nazareth was the Christ, the Messiah and Redeemer, which most of Judaism does not (with certain exceptions).
Islam is a different critter entirely. Although they claim otherwise, purporting that Islam is the final and perfect revelation/covenant that "replaces" Christianity and Judaism, it does not take a great deal of comparative study to see that most of what "Allah" supposedly commands is totally contradictory to Judaism and Christianity, in particular the hostility of Islam towards the other two.
I have read the Bible, and most of the Quran. It is clear to me they are NOT talking about the same deity. Not even close.
That's not the point. We are discussing whether or not it's the same God. Not whether said God is valid or not.
Christianity and Judaism believe in the same Creator God.
Where they diverge is the Christian belief that Jesus of Nazareth was the Christ, the Messiah and Redeemer, which most of Judaism does not (with certain exceptions).
Islam is a different critter entirely. Although they claim otherwise, purporting that Islam is the final and perfect revelation/covenant that "replaces" Christianity and Judaism, it does not take a great deal of comparative study to see that most of what "Allah" supposedly commands is totally contradictory to Judaism and Christianity, in particular the hostility of Islam towards the other two.
I have read the Bible, and most of the Quran. It is clear to me they are NOT talking about the same deity. Not even close.
:doh No serious theologian has ever said that Islam "replaces" Judaism or Christianity, nor that this was ever Islam's goal.
The closest equivalent is that Islam is perceived by believers as an "upgrade" to Judaism and Christianity. And references to "people of the book" (Jews and Christians) indicate that they deserve a higher level of respect than atheists and pagans.
Then why did you bring up that issue?
It is germane to the discussion. That should be obvious.
What does an upgrade do?
It replaces the older version.
semantics.
But you just said we weren't discussing it in this thread. Make up your mind, already...
Then why did you bring up that issue?
Not necessarily. It could just add material to the older version, and/or alter only some of it. You don't "upgrade" the Mac OS with Windows.
It's obvious by your silly little games that you have nothing of substance to add. As per usual.
:shrug: I've given my viewpoint on the matter. I knew some would disagree. I'm not particularly interested in arguing about it.
Simple yes / no poll.
But please explain your answer.
I will go on a head to head with you about the prophecies, as long as there are no 'raw links' used as so called 'evidence', and that the source of any quotes is shown. since there are so many little tiny ones, we can concentrate on Isaiah 7:14 and Isaiah 53. Think you can rise to the challenge??? Or will you back out.
Yes......and all that means is that the "Gospels" were crafted by the followers of Paul--using the letters of Paul (which came years before the "Gospels") as a guide to craft the similarities in the words of Paul and his invented "Christ."
Isaiah 53? You say the suffering servant is Israel. So address each of these 8 individual points in the link that blows your claim out of the water.
1. The servant of Isaiah 53 is an innocent and guiltless sufferer. Israel is never described as sinless. Isaiah 1:4 says of the nation: "Alas sinful nation, a people laden with iniquity. A brood of evildoers, children who are corrupters!" He then goes on in the same chapter to characterize Judah as Sodom, Jerusalem as a harlot, and the people as those whose hands are stained with blood (verses 10, 15, and 21). What a far cry from the innocent and guiltless sufferer of Isaiah 53 who had "done no violence, nor was any deceit in his mouth!"
2. The prophet said: "It pleased the LORD to bruise him." Has the awful treatment of the Jewish people (so contrary, by the way, to the teaching of Jesus to love everyone) really been God's pleasure, as is said of the suffering of the servant in Isaiah 53:10 ? If, as some rabbis contend, Isaiah 53 refers to the holocaust, can we really say of Israel's suffering during that horrible period, "It pleased the LORD to bruise him?" Yet it makes perfect sense to say that God was pleased to have Messiah suffer and die as our sin offering to provide us forgiveness and atonement.
Why Israel Cannot be the Suffering Servant in Isaiah 53
A Evangelical, Reformed, and Covenantal ministry to the Jewish people based in Glenside, Pennsylvania USA. Features a newsletter, resources for churches, .
Religious Jews can pray in a mosque but they can't pray in a church according to the Halacha, because of the Christiania's believe in the Trinity unlike the Muslim. The Muslim laws are mistakes but they praying to the same God as Jews. This what I remember from the yeshiva.Simple yes / no poll.
But please explain your answer.
It's not like you to post drive-by opinions that you don't care to defend.
According to this widespread rabbinic opinion, Isaiah 53 contains a deeply moving narrative which world leaders will cry aloud in the messianic age. The humbled kings of nations (52: 15) will confess that Jewish suffering occurred as a direct result of “our own iniquity,” (53:5) e.g., depraved Jew-hatred, rather than, as they previously thought, the stubborn blindness of the Jews.
The stunned reaction of the world’s nations to the unexpected vindication and redemption of the Jewish nation in the messianic age is a recurring theme throughout the Hebrew Scriptures.4 Israel’s neighbors will be amazed when their age-old assessment of the Jew is finally proven wrong. Throughout Israel’s long and bitter exile, the nations mistakenly attributed the miserable predicament of the Jew to his stubborn rejection of the world’s religions. In the End of Days, however, the gentiles will discover what was until then unimaginable – the unwavering Jew was, in fact, all this time faithful to the one true God. On the other hand, “We despised and held him of no account” (53:3).
According to the most ancient rabbinic commentaries, the identification of Israel as God’s servant is evident throughout the four Servant Songs.5 As such, rabbinic sources from the Talmudic period identify the servant of Isaiah 53 in the plain sense as the Jewish people, consistent with the previous three Servant Songs.
For example, commenting on Isaiah 53 the Talmud states:
Rava said in the name of Rav Sachorah who said it in the name of Rav Huna: Whomever the Holy One, blessed is He, desires, He crushes with afflictions as it is stated “And the one whom Hashem desires He crushed with sickness (Isaiah 53:10). Now, one might have thought that this applies even if he does not accept [the afflictions] with love. Scripture therefore states in the continuation of the verse “if his soul acknowledges his guilt” (ibid.)… And if he accepts [the afflictions with love] what is his reward? He will see offspring and live long days. Moreover, he will retain his studies, as it is stated “and the desire of Hashem will succeed in his hand” (ibid.).
(Talmud Berachos 5a)
The ancient Midrash Rabba on Numbers 23 likewise attests that Isaiah 53 refers to the nation of Israel:
“I have eaten my honeycomb with my honey” (Song of Songs 5:1): because the Israelites poured out their soul to die in captivity, as it is said, “Because he poured out his soul to die.”
(Midrash Rabba Isaiah 53:12)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?