• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Do Jews, Christians, and Muslims worship the same god.

That is a contradiction. You do NOT have to live a righteous existence if Jesus is going to wash your sins away. Which is it?

There are limits to what God will tolerate. You have to do your part. Jesus did his.
 
Whatever, as if you know what you are even talking about. Total fail as a thread...

Objection, Your Honour!
This thread is one of the best threads I have seen in this forum yet. eace
 
@ Caspar

And where are Melchior and Balthasar?
They might not agree with you!
 
Why don't you know? Maybe more research into the various religions will answer your questions.

That particular part is scripture.

Which he is unfamiliar with...
 
It depends who you ask, but from an objective POV, they do not appear to be the same God. They have very distinct personalities and goals.

OTOH, the easiest way to give your religion gravitas is to appropriate another religion's God(s). Rome did it to Greece and the Christians and Muslims did it to the Jews (who may have done it to the Zoroastrians)
 

We have a question mark here.
Sufi Islam is claimed to originate from the teacher Zoroaster.
I can see where the Zoroastrians incorporated Islam into their religion to save their heads.
Of course they are persecuted today just like every other sect of Islam.

Islam does not like, and kills, the "Bad Muslims".

who are the "Bad Muslims', you ask?????

Easy answer... the other ones.
 

#fakehistory
 
Yet, that has nothing to do with John the Baptist being 'christian'. Do try to actually give accurate information someday. And, you really should vet your sources , 'cold case christianity' indeed.

You have some very strange ideas on that. Nothing mainstream about them.
 
There are three of them now - the Holy Trinity.

The answer to the question can be explained with the concept of the Trinity. The Trinity is composed of God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit.

One way to explain this enigma is consider a man named Joe. Joe is a husband to his wife, a father to his children, and a son to his parents. He is one person, but he interacts with each family member in different ways. He is firm but fair with his children. He is loving and intimate with his wife, and he is respectful and compliant to his parents. He is still one person, but he specializes his personally to the needs of each. While each family member relates to him in a parallel way.

To the Jews, God is the Father, to the Christians God is the son, and to the Muslims he is the Holy Spirit, incarnated. The unique position in the world order of Christianity occurred because Christians are the most diversified, with all three aspect of the Holy Spirit allowable and represented. There are the "by the book" fire and brimstone Christians; Father. There are the more feeling based Christians; love, connected to God the Son, and there are the more creative and spontaneous worshippers, connected to the Holy Spirit.

They are one family, who gets together during the holidays. This is like a family during the holidays where parents, children and spouses are all in the same room. Joe has to relate to all at the same time, which merges Joes into the unique person he is. He become more playful with his children, he become bolder with his parents, and more of a goof with his wife. Some alcohol may have been consumed. Come Monday and it is back to work, and the trinity in Joe returns, helping to maximize his family.
 

:giggle1:
 
This comes up a lot, in a hand wave type of logic.
The God of Abraham

The Jews invented the God as we know it, granted much info came from previous religions, Summarian, etc.
They have the patient on it.

"Invented," or, came from? Which is it?




The Christians stole the God from the Jews,

Worshipping the same God.....isn't stealing from the Jews.




added more Gods to it, changed the rules, and turned on the Jews.

The concept of the Triune God is part of the Old Testament.

The rules has not changed - the Commandments are still intact.
Some Mosaic laws became obsolete due to the death and Resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Christians didn't turn on the Jews. Lol. Almost all apostles were Jews! :lol:




The Muslims then stole the God,

Worshipping the same God.....isn't stealing.




eliminated the Christian Gods, instilled their own prophet,

i don't think they eliminated the Abrahamic God, but they did install their own prophet.



changed the rules again, and turned on the Jews and the Christians.

The prophet came up with his own book, with its own rules.




Now God is either a wishy/washy schizophrenic, who simply cannot make up his mind.


What wishy-washy thought is that? It defies logic!

Your opinion says it is men who either invented, or borrowed or stole, and it's also men who changed the rules....... and you're blaming God???? :mrgreen:



Or they are different Gods.

You're utterly confused. :lol:
 
Last edited:

This fact is why they call the 3 monotheistic religions the Abrahamic religions. The religious wars in the middle east can be thought of a form of sibling rivalry of which child or sect their god approves and loves the most.

Surprisingly to most people, the Islamic faith acknowledges this because Jesus is a prophet in that religion.

The Muslim Jesus provides common ground for Christianity, Islam | National Catholic Reporter
 
And where did the "Holy Ghost" cone from, so all of a sudden?
 
Of course they do. It is how the faithful characterise this figure in their respective mythologies that differs.
 
And where did the "Holy Ghost" cone from, so all of a sudden?

It comes from the misunderstanding of the Hebrew term Ruach and how the Jewish faith applied it to God. . The 'breath' of God is used as a term for God when God is creating. the 'breath' of God seperated water and land, The breath of God gave life to man.
Since the breath of god gave life(spirit) to man, it was construed by Christians to be 'spirit'. Without breathing, there is no animation of man, no spirit of man. Where the Jews saw the 'breath of God'. Somehow, the early Christians seperated the 'Holy Spirit' from merely being another term for God to be something more. Then they add the worship of Jesus, and run up against the first commandment, which by then was being interpreted as there only being one God. To reconcile the 'there is only one God', with the 'father son, and holy ghost', and thus the trinity was born.
 

The irony here is that most Americans really have no idea what is in the Quran, the Muslim equivalent of the Bible, beyond the mostly negative and out of context soundbites they hear on talk radio, cable TV or the internet.

Context is a fascinating subject when applied to quotes from the Qur'an. There are many examples in which the Qur'an speaks of a specific incident, and then follows it up with a general statement meant as a lesson. For example, surah 8 was revealed after the Battle of Badr, which was the first major battle between the Muslims and the Meccan pagans. It is part recap of the battle, and part call to arms in a general and on-going sense. Verses 12-13 are a case in point:

"I will instill terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them. That is because they opposed Allah and His Messenger. And whoever opposes Allah and His Messenger - indeed, Allah is severe in penalty".

This says that the Meccans were fought because they refused to follow Mohamed, but is stated in a way as to suggest broader, on-going applicability. Context tells us why a statement is made, but the statement itself says what it says, independent of the context in which it was written.
 
All you have to do to prove me wrong is to provide a quote from scripture in which limits to God's forgiveness are given. Easy peasy.

"For example, whoever speaks a word against the Son of man, it will be forgiven him; but whoever speaks against the holy spirit, it will not be forgiven him, no, not in this system of things nor in that to come." Matthew 12:32

"For if we practice sin willfully after having received the accurate knowledge of the truth, there is no longer any sacrifice for sins left, but there is a certain fearful expectation of judgment and a burning indignation that is going to consume those in opposition." Hebrews 10:26,27

"For as regards those who were once enlightened and who have tasted the heavenly free gift and who have become partakers of holy spirit and who have tasted the fine word of God and powers of the coming system of things, but have fallen away, it is impossible to revive them again to repentance, because they nail the Son of God to the stake again for themselves and expose him to public shame." Hebrews 6:4-6
 

Yup, I agree


Yes, and no, but mostly yes. For the first 12 years of Islam, Mohamed was in Mecca trying to convince the pagans to abandon polytheism in favor of monotheism with him as their leader. He tried to do this by repeating all of the fire and brimstone accounts from the OT, and added virtual nothing unique that would set Islam apart from Judaism. The ONLY exception is that Mohamed claimed that God had chosen him to receive God.3.0. The 'no' part comes in with Christianity. None of the bible stories Mohamed tried to scare the pagans with were from the NT. Jesus and Mary are the only NT characters spoken of, and only in terms of Jesus being a mortal prophet and Mary being a virtuous woman. Believing Jesus to be the son of God is described as "a thing most monstrous (19:88-89)".
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…