• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Did the staff cuts at National Weather Service have anything to do with the tragedy in Texas?

WisconIndependent

DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 3, 2023
Messages
2,058
Reaction score
2,637
Gender
Male
Doge cutting 10% of the National Weather Service staff have anything to do with the tragedy in Texas along with the way Texas handled the problem?
 
I honestly don't think it likely did. The water rose so darn fast and at unexpected levels. We may find out differently but from what I have heard reported it sounds as if the failures were mostly at the State and local level. Having said that, every single natural disaster is going to come under incredible scrutiny and I suspect hurricane season may tell a different story. The weather services involved with hurricane was especially hard hit by Doge.
 
The NWS put out warnings well ahead of the flooding. People worked extra shifts and covered for gaps in staffing to get the forecast as best they could.

The local area seems to have lacked the capacity to warn residents.

🤷‍♀️
 
I don’t think it did. The cuts will have impacts but these things take a year or two to become obvious. In this particular event, NWS met or exceeded its targets.
 

Did the staff cuts at National Weather Service have anything to do with the tragedy in Texas?​


No, it was Biden and the dems' fault.
 
The NWS put out warnings well ahead of the flooding. People worked extra shifts and covered for gaps in staffing to get the forecast as best they could.

The local area seems to have lacked the capacity to warn residents.

🤷‍♀️

Yes. And some of the local residents including a camp operator didn't take the initiative to keep themselves informed on a rapidly deteriorating situation.

I can't imagine a camp with 750 children in residency and everybody is asleep. Bad weather incoming or not, someone should be alert, in charge, and responsible at all times.
 
Doge cutting 10% of the National Weather Service staff have anything to do with the tragedy in Texas along with the way Texas handled the problem?
I doubt it but I do think Musk's slash and burn approach increased stresses on already stressed agencies. We should use this event to re-evaluate the conditions of the agencies that are set up to help us, at all levels.
 
I don’t think it did. The cuts will have impacts but these things take a year or two to become obvious. In this particular event, NWS met or exceeded its targets.
Meteorologists are some of the most passionate about their job type people I’ve known…they’ll do everything they CAN with the tools they have to warn people of severe weather. I have two friends whose husbands work for the NWS. They’re understaffed and running on caffeine and determination…but they’re doing their best.

The NWS is already issuing flash flood alerts for my part of the country for tonight because of the rain incoming from Chantal this evening.

The NWS really does try to do their very best.
 
I doubt it but I do think Musk's slash and burn approach increased stresses on already stressed agencies. We should use this event to re-evaluate the conditions of the agencies that are set up to help us, at all levels.
I feel differently. Now that Trump has weaponized the federal government to attack states, I think we should deprive him of that power by cutting as much federal apparatus as possible and returning the monies to the states. I live in a state can afford to stand up its own alternatives and I’d rather do that than fund a NOAA or FEMA that cuts me out of their services because Donald is having a tantrum.
 
Meteorologists are some of the most passionate about their job type people I’ve known…they’ll do everything they CAN with the tools they have to warn people of severe weather. I have two friends whose husbands work for the NWS. They’re understaffed and running on caffeine and determination…but they’re doing their best.

The NWS is already issuing flash flood alerts for my part of the country for tonight because of the rain incoming from Chantal this evening.

The NWS really does try to do their very best.
I agree. It’s a terrific agency. Unfortunately it’s only a matter of time before Donald looks for ways to degrade NWS work products to blue states. You and I both know this is coming. I’d rather see the agency killed than have it weaponized against me while still being stuck with the bill.
 
I think this one is in Texas. There was a story on Yahoo last night about a GOP congressman regretting not voting for a bill that would have help fund better warning systems. Due to his MAGA stupidity.
Texans should hold their local MAGA assholes accountable, but they won’t.

Future disasters will be Trump and Musks fault as the cuts they made further degrade the agencies.
 
I agree. It’s a terrific agency. Unfortunately it’s only a matter of time before Donald looks for ways to degrade NWS work products to blue states. You and I both know this is coming. I’d rather see the agency killed than have it weaponized against me while still being stuck with the bill.
I really hope they realize shutting the data off from those satellites would be very bad and the “pause” turns into scrapping that plan.
 
How could it not have had an effect?

FEMA losing roughly 20% of permanent staff, including longtime leaders, ahead of hurricane season​


Because not every individual is effective, and not every individual performs to their maximum capacity.

As example, in the Army I sometimes had 12 or more in my section, but other times had only 6 or 7. The mission didn't change and it was still accomplished to standard.
 
How could it not have had an effect?
From what I've read, and I may be wrong, it is possible that specifically cuts at NWS did not make this situation so disastrous.

AFAIK NWS was making much more moderate predictions until fairly shortly before the storm really hit. I don't think they would have predicted 30 foot high storm surges even if they were fully staffed.

I suspect there are two more substantial issues.

1) Despite Abbott proclaiming just a few weeks ago that "Texas is ready" for disasters, they weren't ready.

2) Trump / Musk / DOGE / Noem gleefully gutted FEMA. The federal government as allegedly "activated" FEMA, but what the f*** does that even mean, given that they are on the verge of eliminating it? :rolleyes:

We should note that time is of the essence for finding and rescuing survivors... and the lack of genuine federal assistance means they're going to run out of time.

Even if NWS did its job properly this time, it's inevitable that service will degrade, that their predictive accuracy will decline, and people will be harmed or killed because Republicans gutted it.

Sadly, MAGA will never hold any Trumpies or Republicans accountable for their failures. Meaning it's going to keep happening, and they won't try to stop it happening again. 🤮
 
Last edited:
Doge cutting 10% of the National Weather Service staff have anything to do with the tragedy in Texas along with the way Texas handled the problem?

Yes. All the Trump actions regarding the Weather Service have had an effect.

We warned that it would make storms more deadly. We were told that we were fear mongers by the MAGA Fanboys.
 
Because not every individual is effective, and not every individual performs to their maximum capacity.

As example, in the Army I sometimes had 12 or more in my section, but other times had only 6 or 7. The mission didn't change and it was still accomplished to standard.
A generalization on your part with not knowing where those 20% cuts of permanent staff at FEMA were.
 
Yes. And some of the local residents including a camp operator didn't take the initiative to keep themselves informed on a rapidly deteriorating situation.
On the other hand...


"It was about 1 a.m. on the Fourth of July when the facilities manager at a central Texas summer camp saw water from the Guadalupe River steadily rising amid a deluge of rain.

Aroldo Barrera notified his boss, who had been monitoring reports of the storms approaching Presbyterian Mo-Ranch Assembly, a recreation destination where an intercultural youth conference had been called off early just hours earlier.

Despite an absence of warning by local authorities, camp officials acted quickly on their own, relocating about 70 children and adults staying overnight in a building near the river. With the kids safe, camp leaders including President and CEO Tim Huchton were able to avoid the catastrophe that hit at least one other camp near Hunt, where the 500-acre Mo-Ranch is located."


With a name like "Aroldo Barrera" and I am sure naturally brown skin, it's a good thing this hero wasn't scooped up by ICE and shipped off to Sudan before he was experienced enough to know what was coming, and what needed to be done.
 

Did the staff cuts at National Weather Service have anything to do with the tragedy in Texas?​

No.

The weather service had plenty of people on duty.

The tragedy was caused by other, local, factors...not much of an early warning system, people ignoring the warnings that were sent out, etc.
 
I feel differently. Now that Trump has weaponized the federal government to attack states, I think we should deprive him of that power by cutting as much federal apparatus as possible and returning the monies to the states. I live in a state can afford to stand up its own alternatives and I’d rather do that than fund a NOAA or FEMA that cuts me out of their services because Donald is having a tantrum.
If only you had read and appreciated the Constitution you would have been on the states rights train long ago. Your TDS got you to the right place, so there is a benefit to it after all.
 
I think it did. How much i cant honestly say but nothing goes with out consequences. Just how life works.
This was also on a local level as well. Residents didnt want to pay higher taxes for a warning system.
The camp had a no device policy which is stupid. ( not for the kids but you need something for like this).
There has been one other flood in 87. Thats enough to have some type of system in place.
 
If only you had read and appreciated the Constitution you would have been on the states rights train long ago. Your TDS got you to the right place, so there is a benefit to it after all.
Yeah this isnt reality fletch. States lost when Jefferson lost to Hamilton.
 
Back
Top Bottom