• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Did Lindbergh kill his own son?

"Some facts speak to it".

Charles Lindbergh was a pretty terrible person in retrospect, but I would need a lot of real evidence to believe the man murdered his own son. Or any evidence. Any evidence would be a good start.
Its an interesting quirk of human empathy that can cause us to view those closest to us with the most compassion. Yeah i would have to see evidence too.
 
When the body was found days later, Lindbergh had it cremated at once, thus destoying valuable evidence

I have read that the baby was partially buried and his body badly decomposed, and this was in the 1930s before the development of real forensic science. Of course they cremated the body of poor child.

That could be the case but if you know anything about eugenecists, these are people that would never put themselves on the chopping block if push came to shove, everyone else has to be sacrificed. They wouldnt sacrifice their own.

Well yeah. If the child had any abnormalities, Charles Lindbergh would have either said (1) they were not so serious that sterilization or euthanasia was necessary or (2) they were injuries caused by incompetent or malicious doctors. Incompetent or malicious Jewish doctors.
 
That could be the case but if you know anything about eugenecists, these are people that would never put themselves on the chopping block if push came to shove, everyone else has to be sacrificed. They wouldnt sacrifice their own.
His son was not genetically perfect. This would have been more than he could deal with.

According to the FBI:

The head was crushed, there was a hole in the skull and some of the body members were missing. The body was positively identified and cremated at Trenton, New Jersey, on May 13, 1932.

The only reason I can think of that some parts may have been missing is that Lindburgh was trying to hide the abnormalities in son's body from the world. If his son had Down's Syndrome, crushing the head would have been a good way to hide that, at least by the standards of that time.

Whoever it was that said this whole case stunk was absolutely correct.

I really hope I am proven wrong on this because it's just too sick to be real.
 
His son was not genetically perfect. This would have been more than he could deal with.

According to the FBI:

The head was crushed, there was a hole in the skull and some of the body members were missing. The body was positively identified and cremated at Trenton, New Jersey, on May 13, 1932.

The only reason I can think of that some parts may have been missing is that Lindburgh was trying to hide the abnormalities in son's body from the world. If his son had Down's Syndrome, crushing the head would have been a good way to hide that, at least by the standards of that time.

Whoever it was that said this whole case stunk was absolutely correct.

I really hope I am proven wrong on this because it's just too sick to be real.
i fear it is real ….

and the more one reads about the case, the clearer it becomes
 
I am interested in anything!
I suggest Reclaiming History, it blows away all the CT BS surrounding the JFK murder.

As for Lindbergh, I see nothing in this CT. The moon is made of cheese, saying it is not evidence.
 
His son was not genetically perfect. This would have been more than he could deal with.

According to the FBI:

The head was crushed, there was a hole in the skull and some of the body members were missing. The body was positively identified and cremated at Trenton, New Jersey, on May 13, 1932.

The only reason I can think of that some parts may have been missing is that Lindburgh was trying to hide the abnormalities in son's body from the world. If his son had Down's Syndrome, crushing the head would have been a good way to hide that, at least by the standards of that time.

Whoever it was that said this whole case stunk was absolutely correct.

I really hope I am proven wrong on this because it's just too sick to be real.
you speak the cold hard truth
 
No idea?

With so many years that have passed I don't think there will be a definitive answer?
 
No idea?

With so many years that have passed I don't think there will be a definitive answer?
Given the state of the evidence and the fact that all of those that were involved are now deceased, I am not holding my breath; however, I would love to see the case solved.
 
Back
Top Bottom