- Joined
- Jul 17, 2020
- Messages
- 47,360
- Reaction score
- 26,054
- Location
- Springfield MO
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Very well put.
Just because a particular scietific hypothesis can support a religious belief, that does not render it non science.
“In the field of biology, here is how we can use the scientific method to detect design:
Observation: Intelligent agents solve complex problems by acting with an end goal in mind, producing high levels of CSI. As Stephen Meyer exp6lains, in our experience, systems with large amounts of specified complexity — such as codes and languages — invariably originate from an intelligent source. Likewise, in our experience, intelligence is the cause of irreducibly complex machines.
Hypothesis (Prediction): Natural structures will be found that contain many parts arranged in intricate patterns that perform a specific function — indicating high levels of CSI, including irreducible complexity.
Experiment: Experimental investigations of DNA indicate that it is full of a CSI-rich, language-based code. Cells use computer-like information processing systems to translate the genetic information in DNA into proteins. Biologists have performed mutational sensitivity tests on proteins and determined that their amino acid sequences are highly specified. The end-result of cellular information processing system are protein-based micromolecular machines. Genetic knockout experiments and other studies show that some molecular machines, like the bacterial flagellum, are irreducibly complex.
Conclusion: The high levels of CSI — including irreducible complexity — in biochemical systems are best explained by the action of an intelligent agent.
One can disagree with the conclusions of ID, but one cannot reasonably claim that it is an argument based upon religion, faith, or divine revelation. It is based upon science.
ID design has scientific merit because it is an empirically based argument that uses well-accepted methods of historical sciences in order to detect in nature the types of complexity that we understand, from present-day observations, are derived from intelligent causes. When we study nature through science, we find evidence of fine-tuning and planning — intelligent design — from the macroarchitecture of the entire universe to the tiniest submicroscopic biomolecular machines.”
An Introduction to Intelligent Design
Click here for a reproducible PDF of this article. PDF En Español Intelligent design — often called “ID” — is a scientific theory that holds that the emergence of some features of the universe and…www.discovery.org
“In the field of biology, here is how we can use the scientific method to detect design:
Observation: Intelligent agents solve complex problems by acting with an end goal in mind, producing high levels of CSI. As Stephen Meyer exp6lains, in our experience, systems with large amounts of specified complexity — such as codes and languages — invariably originate from an intelligent source. Likewise, in our experience, intelligence is the cause of irreducibly complex machines.
Hypothesis (Prediction): Natural structures will be found that contain many parts arranged in intricate patterns that perform a specific function — indicating high levels of CSI, including irreducible complexity.
Experiment: Experimental investigations of DNA indicate that it is full of a CSI-rich, language-based code. Cells use computer-like information processing systems to translate the genetic information in DNA into proteins. Biologists have performed mutational sensitivity tests on proteins and determined that their amino acid sequences are highly specified. The end-result of cellular information processing system are protein-based micromolecular machines. Genetic knockout experiments and other studies show that some molecular machines, like the bacterial flagellum, are irreducibly complex.
Conclusion: The high levels of CSI — including irreducible complexity — in biochemical systems are best explained by the action of an intelligent agent.
One can disagree with the conclusions of ID, but one cannot reasonably claim that it is an argument based upon religion, faith, or divine revelation. It is based upon science.
ID design has scientific merit because it is an empirically based argument that uses well-accepted methods of historical sciences in order to detect in nature the types of complexity that we understand, from present-day observations, are derived from intelligent causes. When we study nature through science, we find evidence of fine-tuning and planning — intelligent design — from the macroarchitecture of the entire universe to the tiniest submicroscopic biomolecular machines.”
An Introduction to Intelligent Design
Click here for a reproducible PDF of this article. PDF En Español Intelligent design — often called “ID” — is a scientific theory that holds that the emergence of some features of the universe and…www.discovery.org
An entity that arose during the Big Bang would be my guess.Who exactly is this Intelligent Designer of which you all speak?
An entity that arose during the Big Bang would be my guess.
But one can recognize design without naming the designer.
You're not serious right? I kept reading and kept thinking..."crystals" and "crystalline structures".Looks like the evolution deniers are correct and that ID meets the goals of real science.
Does 'design' imply a specific result?Could evolution be that "designer", in other words, a natural process instead of an actual sentient "intelligent" being "designer"?
Sure, it could be.Could evolution be that "designer", in other words, a natural process instead of an actual sentient "intelligent" being "designer"?
Trial and error.Ok. So how “intelligent” is it that almost every species that has ever existed on Earth is now extinct?
Fossil fuel.Ok. So how “intelligent” is it that almost every species that has ever existed on Earth is now extinct?
An entity that arose during the Big Bang would be my guess.
But one can recognize design without naming the designer.
Could evolution be that "designer", in other words, a natural process instead of an actual sentient "intelligent" being "designer"?
And yet, the Bible identified the rabbit as a cud chewer long before science had any idea...in fact many balked at the Bible claiming such a thing...How the Rabbit Digestive System Works
How the Rabbit Digestive System Works
Learn more about the complexity of the rabbit's digestive system and how it works.owlcation.com
Intelligent design. ROFL.
So how is eating your excrement an example of intelligent design?And yet, the Bible identified the rabbit as a cud chewer long before science had any idea...in fact many balked at the Bible claiming such a thing...
"However, you must not eat the following animals that chew the cud or that have split hooves: the camel, the hare, and the rock badger, because they chew the cud but do not have split hooves. They are unclean for you." Deuteronomy 14:7
Sure, it could be.
The current explanation for how that happened seems to pile one supposition on top of another to come up with an unlikely scenario, but it could be right.
It seems more like they ask themselves whether it is possible in any way to avoid an intelligent designer and Darwinism and neo-Darwinism is what they came up with.
Not at all.Or perhaps they followed the evidence to a reasoned scientific conclusion.
It is based upon science.
Not at all.
Uh, no it's not. None of what preceded this statement was science. It was motivated reasoning.
What specifically is in error? What is the motivation? Is Intelligent Design “motivated reasoning”?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?