• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Dems "Snuggling Up" to 2012 Presidential Hopefuls who share similar social views

Objective Voice

DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 14, 2008
Messages
13,171
Reaction score
5,920
Location
Huntsville, AL (USA)
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
I found this article this morning and thought, "BRILLIANT!" Take down those GOPers who are clearly two-faced, the "I was for it before I was against it" Republican presidential hopefuls like Gingrich, Romney and Huntsman. Speaking of Huntsman...

I watched his speech in New Hampshire this weekend; if I didn't know better I'd swear I was listening to the President speak because much of what Huntsman said was an echo of the types of things President Obama has spoke of throughout his tenure as President. For example, he spoke extensively about the need for civility in our national politics. Isn't that something President Obama has been calling for for some time now? Bipartisanship?

Huntsman also spoke highly concerning our nation's need to be innovators and to trust in American's resolve where the economy is concerned. He even mildly talked down against China cautioning Americans not to become too overwhelmingly concerned about their perceived economic rise or global power stating, "They [China] have their own problems." I couldn't help thinking to myself, "These are the exact same things the President has been speaking about for well over a year now."

I think the strategy Democrats are employing currently in the initial run-up to the 2012 primaries is smart - paint as many of the opposition as near "mirror images of your political ideology". So, unless you agree with the last line of commentary from the article...

"If Republican primary voters fall for letting the Obama administration pick their nominee by who they don't praise, shame on us," McHenry said. "It ultimately strikes me as a sign of Democrats' weakness. We now know who they're afraid to run against."

...I think it's a smart move.

If nothing else, it should atleast narrow the playing field which is exactly what you want at this early stage of the 2012 presidental race. It'll also do something else: force the GOP hopefuls to find more concrete issues to run on instead of just being in "attack Obama" mode. Right now, no GOP candidate can honestly make the claim the he/she has anything new to offer other than stay in "attack Obama" mode.

I'm staying tuned; it's going to be a very interesting presidential race.
 
Back
Top Bottom