• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Democrats Unveil Changes To House Rules On Debt Ceiling, Ethics

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
94,423
Reaction score
82,874
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Democrats Unveil Changes To House Rules On Debt Ceiling, Ethics


Incoming House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.


The 116th US Congress House of Representatives gets sworn in tomorrow morning. :thumbs:
 
Democrats Unveil Changes To House Rules On Debt Ceiling, Ethics



Incoming House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.






The 116th US Congress House of Representatives gets sworn in tomorrow morning. :thumbs:



Re: the Gephardt Rule: then there is effectively no debt ceiling at all, so why bother with the charade of having it? (Never mind that the House can't unilaterally raise the debt ceiling.)

Also, considering the rule changes (and it has been mostly rule changes) that outgoing Republicans have instituted to limit Democrat power here and there have inspired great rage, why is there not a similar outrage to a rule change making it harder to unseat the Speaker now that Pelosi sits in that chair?
 
That rule about the debt ceiling...let me know when the House passes a budget. They haven't done it in 10 years, you know.

That's untrue. The House passed many budgets. The Senate pointedly didn't vote on them, mostly by Harry Reid's hand.
 
I disagree with the auto-raising of the debt ceiling to accommodate any and all deficit spending without ever having to acknowledge that fact. It simply lets congress critters claim that they did no such thing - they only voted for the "mom's are good people act" (which just happened to add billions to the deficit/national debt).
 

Because Pelosi agreed to that in order to garner the votes to become Speaker. She is no fool ... a term limit, so-to-speak, was greatly desired by the younger incoming representatives. Besides, she doesn't fear competition.
 
Because Pelosi agreed to that in order to garner the votes to become Speaker. She is no fool ... a term limit, so-to-speak, was greatly desired by the younger incoming representatives. Besides, she doesn't fear competition.

This makes no sense. The rule makes it harder to unseat a Speaker, not easier.
 
Re: Gephardt Rule

 
Additionally, Democrats are changing the rules regarding motions "to vacate the chair," a procedural tool that could be used to force out a sitting House speaker.
This is just the Democrat Party once again showing disdain for the democratic process. In this case, the ability of the majority to unseat the Speaker of the House if deemed unfit.
 
This is just the Democrat Party once again showing disdain for the democratic process. In this case, the ability of the majority to unseat the Speaker of the House if deemed unfit.

Huh. What's the 'Democrat Party'? Never heard of it before.
 
So? It still makes having a debt ceiling pointless. Why not be earnest and eliminate the debt ceiling, period?

Why won't McConnell be honest and allow Senators to vote on a new funding bill that will be passed by the House tomorrow?
 
Why won't McConnell be honest and allow Senators to vote on a new funding bill that will be passed by the House tomorrow?

Ask him. Has nothing to do with this.
 
So? It still makes having a debt ceiling pointless. Why not be earnest and eliminate the debt ceiling, period?

The GOP needs an excuse handy so that it can hold the budget and federal workers hostage, then issue demands. That's what it was the first few times around. Now it's even dumber: about a wall.


Why would the GOP agree to get rid of something that lets them play these games in the future?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…