aquapub
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2005
- Messages
- 7,317
- Reaction score
- 344
- Location
- America (A.K.A., a red state)
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Yes, Ronald Reagan was a dem.t has since been controlled by Hollywood fanatics
[Anti-American activist groups/QUOTE]
Yeah, you know the ones who want jobs to stay in America, support minimum wage to help citizens, and try not to bite off more "terrorists" than they can chew.
Yes Bush and Cheney are dirt-poorwealthy elitist snobs
Finally someone agrees with me, Lenin was a dem.extreme socialists
Because rich people are a very small minority, don't represnt no one but themselves, but unlike most they have the wealth to pay for their views, and ave. American couldn't give thousands to a party, so they can't buy prestige.But why is being "for the rich" valid criticism?
Comrade Brian said:Yes, I've heard some Republicans and Libertarians pretty much say that poor people have an easy life, they think that they don't work but still have govt. assistance.
Addition: Many of the same people think that impovershed people also want to be in their position, otherwise they wouldn't be in it, and that they're all drug addicts.
Shows how stupid some people can be.
Caine said:But, yeah, we need someone who actually cares about the common folk.
Caine said:Hrmmm... Democrats are for the Rich?????
Lets see here.....
Republican Views:
Social Security: Privatize Social Security, screw the poor man because he doesn't know how, nor does he have the time or money to learn how, to invest or work the market, nor can he afford someone to help him.
Public Schools: Abolish the public school system (Ive seen a few on this site that think this way), Screw the poor man who can't afford thousands of dollars to pay for his children's Private School Education.
Welfare: Abolish the Welfare System, Screw the poor man who is trying to keep food on the table while working some poor ass 5.15 per hour job because the Republicans won't agree to raise the Minimum Wage. Also, screw the poor woman who has been abused and beat on by her husband and is trying to get her and her children out on thier own and away from this abusive monster.
Tax Cuts: Give all the money back to the guys who can already afford to buy private islands and personal jets, they need it more than the guy whose child is eating 1/2 of what the Rich man considers a decent meal, PER DAY, the man whose child is on the Free Lunch program at the public school, and that is the kids most nutritional meal of the day. Nah, that Corporate Money Hugger needs the money for his 3rd Mercedes.
Hmmmm.......
Did I miss anything?
LOL... That means nothing.aquapub said:Another piece of evidence that Democrats truly represent the wealthy, elitist snobs of the world is the fundraising data from the 2004 Presidential election cited in Byron York's, "The Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy" in the 3rd chapter called, Shell Game.
64% of donations that were under $200 went to Republicans, while only 35% went to Democrats. 92% of the checks that were over $1 million went to Democrats.
The notion that Democrats represent the average Joe is nothing short of an astonishingly successful lie.
aquapub said:Another great example of how Democrats represent wealthy elitists and not middle America is their position on the Patriot Act. Polls consistently put 2/3of Americans supporting its renewal.
The Democrat's postition is not the people's position, it's the position of George Soros and Arianna Huffington.
If you were to have watched the News Confrence, you would have seen him pause, then tell the country "let me just put it.... its not in the best intrests of the country." then give an evil looking half-grin, as if something is up his sleeve. I consider that a threat from within myself.Bush said:BUSH: My job is to confront big challenges and lead. And I fully understand everybody is not going to agree with my decisions. But the president's job is to do what he thinks is right, and that's what I'm going to continue to do.
Secondly, if people want to play politics with the Patriot Act, it's -- well, let me just put it, it's not in the best interests of the country.
Caine said:LOL... That means nothing.
The 'average joe' doesn't contribute money. The 64% comes from the Christian people who think Bush is the second comming of Christ, and the hillbillies who are afraid liberals are going to take thier guns away or some ****.
The 92% comes from the individuals who have money and want to help endorse a Candidate that will make a change, alot of these are Hollywood people (because we know alot of them are Democrats), as well as many other individuals. Someone said it earlier, Democrats get money from rich individuals, Republicans get money from Rich Corporations.
I thought the whole idea of American government was to stop the tyrrany of the majority? Just because the majority of people believe something does not make it right.aquapub said:Another great example of how Democrats represent wealthy elitists and not middle America is their position on the Patriot Act. Polls consistently put 2/3of Americans supporting its renewal.
The Democrat's postition is not the people's position, it's the position of George Soros and Arianna Huffington.
You should've been here earlier espousing this when the "Bush's approval rating's at 35%!" threads were started...by guess who?...Engimo said:I thought the whole idea of American government was to stop the tyrrany of the majority? Just because the majority of people believe something does not make it right.
For example, for a long time a majority of people believed that Saddam Hussein had ties to 9/11, which is patently untrue. Government should debate and take the side of whoever has the better arguments, regardless of the amount of people supporting it.
aquapub said:As lovely as it is to listen to you demonstrate my point about liberal snobbery as you trash poor people and Christians, your stereotype-based assumptions are less than convincing.
I have participated in fundraising for Republicans in Midwestern states. These people are not hillbillies, they are your average working stiffs with a strong sense of community. And before you release all this bigotry against Christians, you should know that 45% of Christians in Amderica vote for Democrats.
You are right about one thing. Hollywood stars are one of the larger groups of millionaires who make up the left's base.
I'm not quite sure what your point is. Yeah, I guess pointing to opinion polls does not provide any argument for or against going to war, but that is really irrelevant.cnredd said:You should've been here earlier espousing this when the "Bush's approval rating's at 35%!" threads were started...by guess who?...
Not just war...irrelevant for almost anything political...Engimo said:I'm not quite sure what your point is. Yeah, I guess pointing to opinion polls does not provide any argument for or against going to war, but that is really irrelevant.
Of course you are to say that now.cnredd said:Not just war...irrelevant for almost anything political...
Caine said:Of course you are to say that now.
You wouldn't be saying that if Kerry were elected and running things into the ground.
cnredd said:Nice attempt at smear, but for those that know me, they know you're statement to be false...
If I think Kerry would be running things into the ground, I would say so...
I wouldn't need others' opinions to back me up...momatter how many or few...
I don't "hug" the partisan line on any issue...Caine said:Whoop, I think you misunderstood me.
I didn't say you think Kerry would run things into the ground
I was assuming (making an ass of myself) that you would not agree to your comments on how polls mean nothing to politics if Kerry were the one in office with low approval ratings.
Of course, I got you confused with DeeJayH, because as I recall, you don't hug the partisan line on every issue.
cnredd said:I don't "hug" the partisan line on any issue...
I have my opinions..If they are similiar to what you consider "partisan lines", so be it...
But I don't work outward in...It's the other way around...
Caine said:And This entire thread in itself is a baseless attack on Democrats based on Campaign Finance? That means nothing about who they are "for".
As, most blacks are Democrats, but its argued that most blacks are not rich.
Not everyone donates to Politicians, I know I don't.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?