He isn't over thinking it. He just understands it's bad for politic and is getting worried. There are cracks developing in the Democrats dam. When the rest of this clown show develops with the clown master himself Naddler the dam will burst.Read the next line after the bold: "I just think it could be bad politics.”
It's as though you don't know basic reading comprehension. Is that a requirement to be a die-hard Trump supporter? He agrees it could be bad politics (given that it's obviously never going to be bi-partisan).
He's over-thinking it. He should support the chosen Democratic strategy, because it's right. He should stop over-analyzing it and support them, without reservation, politically, because he's a politician...and the Democratic strategy is Constitutional, entirely appropriate, ethical, and reasonable.
she can and probably would. she needs to stay out of this mess if she wants to make a run in 2024.
She should in no way attach herself to trump in any way at this point. if she does then she will be
smeared more so than what she already will be by the inclusive tolerant leftist party.
Nor should she join the never-Trumpers Mitt Romney team. Rather, she needs to find other ways after the 2020 election to stay in the spotlight now and then. A person can be politically forgotten over half a century of no publicity.
If she runs she will be smeared 24/7 no matter what she does nor doesn't do since Democratic, MSM, press and internet attacks against Republicans usually have no relationship to facts to begin with.
He isn't over thinking it. He just understands it's bad for politic and is getting worried. There are cracks developing in the Democrats dam. When the rest of this clown show develops with the clown master himself Naddler the dam will burst.
Your posts are so depressingly stupid, it's hard to know if you're trolling or you believe the nonsense you write.
In the case you believe it, I will remind you as I just had to remind another incorrect Trump defender, that "innocent until proven guilty"
1. has to do with conviction or plea, to criminal charges.
Trump cannot be charged with federal crimes as POTUS, so that's irrelevant.
2. Impeachment is not a fair criminal process, the jury in this case is stacked in favor of POTUS, has conflicting interests, has been tampered with by POTUS (campaign funds and attacks if they oppose him), etc. It's nothing even close to fair.
3. If we did use an analogy to the criminal justice system, we're in the INVESTIGATION phase ludin.
The investigation phase typically requires "credible allegation of wrongdoing or reasonable basis to believe an American has engaged in [wrongdoing].
We had that with the IG-backed whistle-blower account. Oops on you.
4. Next, since you don't appear to understand America, would be the decision to indict/charge, and this standard is "probable cause". Once again, NOT innocent until proven guilty...that's nonsensical as related to investigations or indictment/charges.
5. in the *TRIAL* phase, he will either be punished or not by the Senate. And since this is political and not a fair/just setup, most everyone believes Republicans will not impeach Trump purely for partisan political reasons, not because of anything to do with evidence...lol. As if. they deny reality/evidence every day Trump is in office, everyone knows it.
Dem congressman warns removing Trump is '''bad politics,''' predicts Nikki Haley as GOP nominee in 2020 | Fox News
A Democratic congressman warned his colleagues on Monday that removing President Trump may be "bad politics" and predicted that Republicans would nominate former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations ambassador Nikki Haley in 2020.
Rep. John Yarmuth, D-Ky., was asked on "CNN Newsroom" about remarks he made last month in which he said: "It's probably not a good thing to get rid of him [Trump]" despite his strong belief that the president should be impeached and removed.
"I do think that it's the right thing to do to remove him from office. I believe he is an imminent danger to this country and to our democracy, but I was saying that the political consequences may not be very good for the Democrats," Yarmuth explained.
Yarmuth then made a bold prediction that the GOP would not proceed with Vice President Mike Pence as the presumptive nominee if the Senate did take the unlikely step of voting to remove Trump from office.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looks like some Democrat Congressmen are starting to get nervous.
Dem congressman warns removing Trump is '''bad politics,''' predicts Nikki Haley as GOP nominee in 2020 | Fox News
A Democratic congressman warned his colleagues on Monday that removing President Trump may be "bad politics" and predicted that Republicans would nominate former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations ambassador Nikki Haley in 2020.
Rep. John Yarmuth, D-Ky., was asked on "CNN Newsroom" about remarks he made last month in which he said: "It's probably not a good thing to get rid of him [Trump]" despite his strong belief that the president should be impeached and removed.
"I do think that it's the right thing to do to remove him from office. I believe he is an imminent danger to this country and to our democracy, but I was saying that the political consequences may not be very good for the Democrats," Yarmuth explained.
Yarmuth then made a bold prediction that the GOP would not proceed with Vice President Mike Pence as the presumptive nominee if the Senate did take the unlikely step of voting to remove Trump from office.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looks like some Democrat Congressmen are starting to get nervous.
He isn't over thinking it. He just understands it's bad for politic and is getting worried. There are cracks developing in the Democrats dam. When the rest of this clown show develops with the clown master himself Naddler the dam will burst.
This is a trial balloon. They are looking for an off ramp if this thing runs the rest of the way off the rails.He didn’t sound worried to me.
She isn't going to run against Trump. She has already said so.Why would Haley being the nominee be an issue? She isn't Trump. I don't care if she runs...she should....You would be much better off with her than Trump
We shouldn't impeach Trump for his dozens of impeachable acts as POTUS, because we don't want Nicky Hailey as POTUS?
Sounds absurd.
"I do think that it's the right thing to do to remove him from office. I believe he is an imminent danger to this country and to our democracy.
He later said: “I don’t think this is about politics and I don’t think we should consider politics," Yarmuth said. "I just think it could be bad politics.”
That's more appropriate. Nicky Hailey would be good for politics and the nation, as compared to Trump.
Trump removed from office has a high 99.99% probability of being good for the nation and politics.
Maybe he thinks we're a nation of partisans. We're not. Presidents are supposed to serve all Americans...Democrats, Republicans, and the rest. I suspect Nicky would fulfill that far more effectively than Trump, while also not being so deplorable as a leader, so corrupt, and such a danger to the nation. Politically if Trump is removed, the nation...including Democrats, benefit greatly. So do Republicans, even if they don't understand it.
She isn't going to run against Trump. She has already said so.
Trump isn't going anywhere he is running in 2020. Don't get your hopes up. :lol:Who said against Trump? I'm talking in place of him
We shouldn't impeach Trump for his dozens of impeachable acts as POTUS, because we don't want Nicky Hailey as POTUS?
Sounds absurd.
"I do think that it's the right thing to do to remove him from office. I believe he is an imminent danger to this country and to our democracy.
He later said: “I don’t think this is about politics and I don’t think we should consider politics," Yarmuth said. "I just think it could be bad politics.”
That's more appropriate. Nicky Hailey would be good for politics and the nation, as compared to Trump.
Trump removed from office has a high 99.99% probability of being good for the nation and politics.
Maybe he thinks we're a nation of partisans. We're not. Presidents are supposed to serve all Americans...Democrats, Republicans, and the rest. I suspect Nicky would fulfill that far more effectively than Trump, while also not being so deplorable as a leader, so corrupt, and such a danger to the nation. Politically if Trump is removed, the nation...including Democrats, benefit greatly. So do Republicans, even if they don't understand it.
Dem congressman warns removing Trump is '''bad politics,''' predicts Nikki Haley as GOP nominee in 2020 | Fox News
A Democratic congressman warned his colleagues on Monday that removing President Trump may be "bad politics" and predicted that Republicans would nominate former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations ambassador Nikki Haley in 2020.
Rep. John Yarmuth, D-Ky., was asked on "CNN Newsroom" about remarks he made last month in which he said: "It's probably not a good thing to get rid of him [Trump]" despite his strong belief that the president should be impeached and removed.
"I do think that it's the right thing to do to remove him from office. I believe he is an imminent danger to this country and to our democracy, but I was saying that the political consequences may not be very good for the Democrats," Yarmuth explained.
Yarmuth then made a bold prediction that the GOP would not proceed with Vice President Mike Pence as the presumptive nominee if the Senate did take the unlikely step of voting to remove Trump from office.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looks like some Democrat Congressmen are starting to get nervous.
She isn't going to run against Trump. She has already said so.
She could run 3rd party.Wouldn't matter if she wanted to anyways as the GOP has closed off any competition from within the GOP from being able to primary against Trump before the primaries have even begun.
She could run 3rd party.
Lies. There is no standard to which you or 90% of Trump supporters will hold Trump to account. There is zero evidence there is, on any issue, throughout this 3 years.
Acting like there is, and we just "have to reach it", is an obvious lie.
Trump would have been long gone had he been anything other than a sitting POTUS. Even a representative would have been forced out long ago. And god forbid, a chairman of a board of a major corporation...he'd have been drummed out after a few months.
Dem congressman warns removing Trump is '''bad politics,''' predicts Nikki Haley as GOP nominee in 2020 | Fox News
A Democratic congressman warned his colleagues on Monday that removing President Trump may be "bad politics" and predicted that Republicans would nominate former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations ambassador Nikki Haley in 2020.
Rep. John Yarmuth, D-Ky., was asked on "CNN Newsroom" about remarks he made last month in which he said: "It's probably not a good thing to get rid of him [Trump]" despite his strong belief that the president should be impeached and removed.
"I do think that it's the right thing to do to remove him from office. I believe he is an imminent danger to this country and to our democracy, but I was saying that the political consequences may not be very good for the Democrats," Yarmuth explained.
Yarmuth then made a bold prediction that the GOP would not proceed with Vice President Mike Pence as the presumptive nominee if the Senate did take the unlikely step of voting to remove Trump from office.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looks like some Democrat Congressmen are starting to get nervous.
I completely see how that's ambiguous. I noticed it could be interpreted either way too, but I wrote it for a reason.That bolded bit right there is about where you lost me. We are absolutely a nation of uninformed, spiteful little partisan fools.
It sounds like a test balloon they are floating, trying to find the best exit ramp when they need to give people an explination for NOT impeaching.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Dem congressman warns removing Trump is '''bad politics,''' predicts Nikki Haley as GOP nominee in 2020 | Fox News
A Democratic congressman warned his colleagues on Monday that removing President Trump may be "bad politics" and predicted that Republicans would nominate former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations ambassador Nikki Haley in 2020.
Rep. John Yarmuth, D-Ky., was asked on "CNN Newsroom" about remarks he made last month in which he said: "It's probably not a good thing to get rid of him [Trump]" despite his strong belief that the president should be impeached and removed.
"I do think that it's the right thing to do to remove him from office. I believe he is an imminent danger to this country and to our democracy, but I was saying that the political consequences may not be very good for the Democrats," Yarmuth explained.
Yarmuth then made a bold prediction that the GOP would not proceed with Vice President Mike Pence as the presumptive nominee if the Senate did take the unlikely step of voting to remove Trump from office.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looks like some Democrat Congressmen are starting to get nervous.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?