• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Delaware Supreme Court: No-Excuse Mail-In Voting, Same-Day Registration Are Unconstitutional

WHy does it have to be massive? 44,000 votes in three swing states and Trump would have been re-elected.
Oh so you think these voter fraud folk know exactly how many votes they need in exactly which State prior to the counts? They really are super geniuses! To have a margin of 44K votes in three swing States they would have to plan for hundreds of thousands of votes over at least 5 States. The electoral college is the deal not the popular vote!
 
WHy does it have to be massive? 44,000 votes in three swing states and Trump would have been re-elected.
Considering the only confirmed voter fraud has been single digits, 44,000 would be massive.
The point is organized massive voter fraud just does not happen.
There is much more room and likelihood of abuse happening within the electoral college than in individual votes.
 
In the days before mail-in ballots, yes. Era of bail-in ballots? - 12,000 votes is a piece of cake.
 
Logistical needs means paid staff, supplies, voting machines etc.

Elections were still managed by the local election boards not CTCL. If you have actual evidence present it. Otherwise this is just another failed conspiracy theory.
 
That's great. Make election day a holiday and go back to in-person voting only. I agree.
 
Logistical needs means paid staff, supplies, voting machines etc.

Elections were still managed by the local election boards not CTCL. If you have actual evidence present it. Otherwise this is just another failed conspiracy theory.

I already posted this in a reply to you. It addresses your misconception. You should have read it the first time.
 
Thinking no one would notice their missing ballots is like thinking no one would notice their missing SS checks.

Why? They send out the ballots unsolicited. I'd bet half the people that get them are actually surprised - "Oh yeah, there's a vote in two months."
 
Why? They send out the ballots unsolicited. I'd bet half the people that get them are actually surprised -
...and those fraud voting experts know exactly which people receiving those ballots are expecting one vs not ...as I said they are bloody geniuses!
 
Pop and I dropped off our ballots yesterday. Lines for same day voter registration and in-person voting were pretty deep.
 
That's great. Make election day a holiday and go back to in-person voting only. I agree.
There’s no legitimate reason to require in-person voting, only.

“Concern” for potential voter fraud is a right wing red herring.

Factually, voter fraud is exceptionally rare.
 
And your fraudulent ballots are where?
 
I heard that the Jewish Space Lasers are enabled with Jedi technology that uses Soros thoughts to forge signatures that are undetectable by elections officials.
 
Why? They send out the ballots unsolicited. I'd bet half the people that get them are actually surprised - "Oh yeah, there's a vote in two months."
I’d bet you’re wrong, and not by a little bit.

Also, what’s wrong with the eligible person described in your post being reminded of an upcoming vote?
 
There’s no legitimate reason to require in-person voting, only.

“Concern” for potential voter fraud is a right wing red herring.
They keep the "concern" smouldering by regularly fanning it. They need it as an excuse when they lose.
 
They keep the "concern" smouldering by regularly fanning it. They need it as an excuse when they lose.
Even though the lie of concern for voter fraud has been thoroughly debunked numerous times, the right continues to push it.

Truly pathetic and disgraceful.
 
So, like he said, postcards, not voter registration forms.
I'm not sure why you are replying to me with info I was already quite clear about in my initial post about the situation.
 
As far as swinging elections, it's entirely dependent on the how close the candidate counts were to one another. Some elections are landslides, some separated by very few votes and everything in between.
That's up to you to decide if you think election fraud exists or not. Personally, I see no reason to have open doors which make fraud available and, in some cases, even easy. I very much want elections everyone has very good reason to trust and as few reasons as possible to doubt. To me, saying an election has integrity because you liked the outcome and saying prove the fraud - when election processes are in place where it would be next to impossible to determine the fraud or the crime, is backwards. Start with election processes full of double checks and solid chains of custody - elections where you won't have half the population feeling l there was likely fraud to some or a high degree, but the processes were so open and lenient it's nearly impossible to prove.
Why does the left so vehemently insist on wide open and lenient processes? There is one very glaring possibility as to why that might be.
 
Those 30,000 people were not able to register.

I agree with the concern about maintaining voter rolls.
I think CO will need to carefully ascertain that none of these people were able to register. There is nothing in the source indicating to me they've done that - beyond this short "trust us" variety sentence:

"Griswold’s office said it was unaware that anyone who received the postcards in error had tried to register."
 
I agree.
 
I did. It doesn't say what you say it does.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…