• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Defense Requests Audio of Trayvon Martin for the Past 3 years...


Actually George followed several black residents or their children home.. and they didn't like it one bit. I can assure you that I would not have put up with George following me.
 
Actually George followed several black residents or their children home.. and they didn't like it one bit. I can assure you that I would not have put up with George following me.

Can you provide any cite to him following the children of several black residents of his community home?

BTW, I am not sure what your new accusation has to do with your original, ridiculous theory that Zimm killed T because Z didn't want to be ID'd by T as the individual that called the police. Did you abandon that one? If so, wise.
 

You have a responsibility as a licensed gun owner to AVOID a situation that can lead to you using deadly force.

Why George Zimmerman’s SYG Defense Won’t Stand « The Hinky Meter

You’re in your car going to the store one night and you see someone walking down a street in your neighborhood and for some unknown reason you decide the dude looks “suspicious”. You pull over (in front of the club house of your neighborhood) and you call 911 to report that a suspicious dude is walking down the street and that they need to come check him out. You have a CCL and you are armed. You get out of your car to follow this person and you do so while carrying your weapon….
…and then stop right there.

Doesn’t matter what you insert past opening the door. You just lost your right to stand your ground. Your ground was in the most protective environment you start at. YOUR ground is in your original position and your obligation as an armed CCL carrier is to AVOID any act that INCREASES the potential to put yourself in danger and result in you using lethal force.
 

It's possible I missed it, but was there a cite in there about all the black children he had followed home in the past?
 
Doesn’t matter what you insert past opening the door. You just lost your right to stand your ground.
:doh
Wrong!
 
Do you have a JD in criminal law?

Were you going to post a cite to support your claim that Zimm followed a bunch of different black kids home?
 
Do you have a JD in criminal law?

BTW, neither does the individual whose blog you are quoting. Regardless, they are wrong.
 
Were you going to post a cite to support your claim that Zimm followed a bunch of different black kids home?

Why for once don't you do your own research?

When someone does post links, you don't read them... But you do continue to badger and troll and repeat yourself.
 
Why for once don't you do your own research?

When someone does post links, you don't read them... But you do continue to badger and troll and repeat yourself.

I actually read the compeltely irrelevant link you provided. Not one mention of all the kids Z had allegedly followed.
 
Tht is one reference.. there are others.

He followed a kid home and accused him of stealing a bike... turns out it was the wrong bike.

Good job.

so, give us the cite for his following black kids home, sharon
 
so, give us the cite for his following black kids home, sharon

I am not going thru the evidence dumps again for hours.

George also called 911 on his landlord who was trying to collect rent and on a function at the clubhouse..

I think GZ has a problem with boundaries.

9. You’re in your car going to the store one night and you see someone walking down a street in your neighborhood and for some unknown reason you decide the dude looks “suspicious”. You pull over (in front of the club house of your neighborhood) and you call 911 to report that a suspicious dude is walking down the street and that they need to come check him out. You have a CCL and you are armed. You get out of your car to follow this person and you do so while carrying your weapon….
…and then stop right there.

Doesn’t matter what you insert past opening the door. You just lost your right to stand your ground. Your ground was in the most protective environment you start at. YOUR ground is in your original position and your obligation as an armed CCL carrier is to AVOID any act that INCREASES the potential to put yourself in danger and result in you using lethal force.
 
George also called 911 on his landlord who was trying to collect rent and on a function at the clubhouse..
Was the landlord a young black child?


The non-lawyer individual's blog post that makes that supposition is incorrect. Let's look at what actual loegal experts state on teh subject of Zimm's SD claim:

 
please explain why being issued a CCL caused zimmerman to be unable to walk and stand freely without being assaulted
 
please explain why being issued a CCL caused zimmerman to be unable to walk and stand freely without being assaulted


You have a responsibility as a licensed gun owner to AVOID a situation that can lead to you using deadly force.

9. You’re in your car going to the store one night and you see someone walking down a street in your neighborhood and for some unknown reason you decide the dude looks “suspicious”. You pull over (in front of the club house of your neighborhood) and you call 911 to report that a suspicious dude is walking down the street and that they need to come check him out. You have a CCL and you are armed. You get out of your car to follow this person and you do so while carrying your weapon….
…and then stop right there.

Doesn’t matter what you insert past opening the door. You just lost your right to stand your ground. Your ground was in the most protective environment you start at. YOUR ground is in your original position and your obligation as an armed CCL carrier is to AVOID any act that INCREASES the potential to put yourself in danger and result in you using lethal force.

Why George Zimmerman’s SYG Defense Won’t Stand « The Hinky Meter

Interesting read because it explains other scenarios where you can shoot.
 

Since you went back to your non-expert blog post and ignore the first expert I quoted.. Let's try another:

Zimmerman timeline examined on 'Flashpoint' (CC) | Home - Home

at about 15:30 the legal expert indicates that Z does have a SD claim, even if he did get ut of his truck and would not be the initial agressor. However, even if he was, the defense will claim that T escalated and would still allow Z a SD claim. I realize, none of this will matter to you.
 

Did you read it carefully??????
 
zimmerman did nothing wrong according to your account
he had no obligation to remain in his vehicle
 
Did you read it carefully??????

Your link? Absolutely. The individual that made the blog post is not a legal expert, does not appear to be alawyer, and is making assumptions not supported by the law. When we look at the legal experts (and just examine the entire law), we find "Valhal"is wrong. Zimm has a SD claim even after getting out of his truck. Did you listen to the legal expert I provided a link to? He clearly says that a SD claim exists and gives the exact reasons why. Somehow, I suspect a local legal expert will have a better understanding of the law then some individual whose only qualification seems to be that he also has a CCW permit.
 
Last edited:
Do you have a JD in criminal law?
:doh
Whether I do or do not has nothing to do with it and you being wrong!
Or did you not know that?
 
Last edited:

Please stop your gibberish. Z did not violate any law by getting out of his car nor did Z violate any law looking to see which direction Z had gone and for an address

Don't forget Z CALLED NEN to report M's suspicious attitude.

Now, point blank what evidence do you have to justify M’s physical attack on Z?

I'm talking evidence....EVIDENCE. Lets hear it from you or your co hort
 

Being irresponsible =/= unlawful.

Stop with the spin bruh:lol:
 
Being irresponsible =/= unlawful.

Stop with the spin bruh:lol:

attacking another without provocation = unlawful action

rinse. repeat. no spin required
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…