• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

DC oversight panel says Trump ally Jeffrey Clark should be disbarred

HenryChinaski

DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 20, 2013
Messages
19,864
Reaction score
24,321
Location
Chi-town
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Liberal

WASHINGTON (AP) — Jeffrey Clark, the former Justice Department official who aided President Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election, should be stripped of his law license, a Washington disciplinary panel ruled on Thursday.
Clark, who is now overseeing a federal regulatory office, played a key role in Trump’s efforts to challenge his election loss to Joe Biden and clashed with Justice Department superiors who refused to back his false claims of fraud.
The D.C. Board of Professional Responsibility’s recommendation will now go to the D.C. Court of Appeals for a final decision.
As always, align yourself with Trump and bad things happen. The guy is bad news and this is indeed a foretelling of what’s in store for the current clowns in Trumps administration.
 
From your link...

OMB spokesperson Rachel Cauley said in a post on X that “this latest injustice is just another chapter in the Deep State’s ongoing assault on President Trump and those who stood beside him in defense of the truth.”​
“JEFF CLARK has been harassed, raided, doxed, and blacklisted simply for questioning a RIGGED election and serving President Trump,” she wrote.​
Clark’s attorney, Harry MacDougald, argued during disciplinary hearings last year that the letter was part of the debate that normally occurs between lawyers and that punishing Clark in those circumstances would have a “chilling effect.”​

btw, who were those "superiors" mentioned in the article? Corrupt Trump haters?
 
From your link...

OMB spokesperson Rachel Cauley said in a post on X that “this latest injustice is just another chapter in the Deep State’s ongoing assault on President Trump and those who stood beside him in defense of the truth.”​
“JEFF CLARK has been harassed, raided, doxed, and blacklisted simply for questioning a RIGGED election and serving President Trump,” she wrote.​
Clark’s attorney, Harry MacDougald, argued during disciplinary hearings last year that the letter was part of the debate that normally occurs between lawyers and that punishing Clark in those circumstances would have a “chilling effect.”​

btw, who were those "superiors" mentioned in the article? Biden pukes?
Don’t cry, they shit canned Eastman, and now Clark is next. I’ll bet a pile of cash that a large chunk of the attorneys working with Trump in this current administration will be on the chopping block at the end of dickheads reign.
We should do a headcount of all of Trump’s previous associates from his prior administration and how many of them have ended up indicted and/or convicted and sent to the poor house.

"Recent administrations with the MOST criminal indictments:

Trump (Republican) — 215

Nixon (Republican) — 76

Reagan (Republican) — 26

"Recent administrations with the LEAST criminal indictments:

Obama (Democrat) — 0

Carter (Democrat) — 1

Clinton (Democrat) — 2
 
Last edited:
From your link...

OMB spokesperson Rachel Cauley said in a post on X that “this latest injustice is just another chapter in the Deep State’s ongoing assault on President Trump and those who stood beside him in defense of the truth.”​
“JEFF CLARK has been harassed, raided, doxed, and blacklisted simply for questioning a RIGGED election and serving President Trump,” she wrote.​
Clark’s attorney, Harry MacDougald, argued during disciplinary hearings last year that the letter was part of the debate that normally occurs between lawyers and that punishing Clark in those circumstances would have a “chilling effect.”​

btw, who were those "superiors" mentioned in the article? Corrupt Trump haters?
Blowback for questioning a rigged election that was never proven as a rigged election after promising to provide evidence many times. Say it ain’t so.

The board said disciplinary counsel proved that Clark made “intentionally false statements” when he continued to push for the Justice Department to issue the letter after being told by superiors that it contained falsehoods.

Well deserved.
 
Don’t cry, they shit canned Eastman, and now Clark is next. I’ll bet a pile of cash that a large chunk of the attorneys working with Trump in this current administration will be on the chopping block at the end of dickheads reign.
We should do a headcount of all of Trump’s previous associates from his prior administration and how many of them have ended up indicted and/or convicted and sent to the poor house.

"Recent administrations with the MOST criminal indictments:

Trump (Republican) — 215

Nixon (Republican) — 76

Reagan (Republican) — 26

"Recent administrations with the LEAST criminal indictments:

Obama (Democrat) — 0

Carter (Democrat) — 1

Clinton (Democrat) — 2
LOL!!

Right. Teach those guy a lesson, eh? Don't rock the boat. Don't fight against our corruption...or we'll **** you up.
 
LOL!!

Right. Teach those guy a lesson, eh? Don't rock the boat. Don't fight against our corruption...or we'll **** you up.
What corruption? None of those bone heads could produce a shred, Now they’re all going the way of Rudy Giuliani and Mike Lindell
Hang around Trump and bad things happen, that is a fact.
 
Back
Top Bottom